OpenText InfoArchive vs Waterford Technologies Cloud Archiver comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText InfoArchive and Waterford Technologies Cloud Archiver based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Commvault, Microsoft and others in File Archiving.
To learn more, read our detailed File Archiving Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Use Waterford Technologies Cloud Archiver?
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File Archiving solutions are best for your needs.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:It has a strong XML engine for reading data and making it indexed and searchable.
Top Answer:Something can be improved with every product. They can continue to grow the solution to scale it and make it easier to configure. It requires a decent amount of XL mapping. They should also have more… more »
Top Answer:The two main use cases are for sunsetting applications and keeping data when you don't want to pay the full licensing costs for the application. For example, for archival purposes, you may need to… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
4th
out of 23 in File Archiving
Views
805
Comparisons
332
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
22nd
out of 23 in File Archiving
Views
21
Comparisons
12
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Cloud Archiver
Learn More
Overview

OpenText InfoArchive is a modern archive solution and cloud-based service for compliant archiving of both structured and unstructured information highly-accessible, scalable and economical.

Cloud Archiver provides a comprehensive solution that maximizes storage intelligence and data placement by using policies to control the movement of critical data from on premise storage to the most appropriate cloud storage transparently for the end users. End users access their data in the same manner they always have regardless of if the file has been archived or not making Cloud Archiver a complete solution for your data management needs.
Sample Customers
BMO Harris Bank, Pacific Life Insurance Company, China CITIC Bank International Limited, Techint Group, Agility, Lahey Health
Savenet Solutions
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Retailer13%
Financial Services Firm12%
Computer Software Company10%
Manufacturing Company8%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise70%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
File Archiving
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Commvault, Microsoft and others in File Archiving. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OpenText InfoArchive is ranked 4th in File Archiving with 1 review while Waterford Technologies Cloud Archiver is ranked 22nd in File Archiving. OpenText InfoArchive is rated 0.0, while Waterford Technologies Cloud Archiver is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of OpenText InfoArchive writes "A solution that helps us sunset applications and manages data". On the other hand, OpenText InfoArchive is most compared with IBM Integrated Archive Platform, whereas Waterford Technologies Cloud Archiver is most compared with .

See our list of best File Archiving vendors.

We monitor all File Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.