OpenText Identity Governance vs Transmit Security comparison

OpenText Identity Governance

Read 4 Transmit Security reviews

1,851 Views
666 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

OpenText Identity Governance and Transmit Security are competing in the identity management and security category. Transmit Security has the upper hand due to its robust feature set which many consider worth the cost.

Features: OpenText Identity Governance offers comprehensive compliance and audit capabilities, enabling efficient management of identity-related risks. Its strong governance functionalities provide vital data for regulatory compliance. Transmit Security provides advanced biometric authentication and seamless integration with existing systems, underpinned by its innovative advancements in authentication technology.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its user interface to streamline the user experience and offer more customization options. Integration with third-party applications can be improved for more fluid operation. Documentation for advanced features needs better detail. Transmit Security can benefit from refining its deployment process to be less complex. It may also enhance support documentation for quicker troubleshooting and provide more endpoint integrations for greater flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Identity Governance has a structured deployment model and offers comprehensive guides, making implementation straightforward even in complex setups. Its responsive support is a boon during deployment. Transmit Security, while excellent in integration capabilities, requires a more intricate deployment process, which is mitigated by its proactive customer service addressing challenges efficiently.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Identity Governance provides a competitive pricing model, promising a favorable return on investment through reduced governance costs. Transmit Security, despite higher initial costs, offers advanced security features that users find justify the investment, leading to substantial ROI in enhanced security capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Identity Governance vs. Transmit Security Report (Updated: June 2026).

OpenText Identity Governance vs. Transmit Security

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Identity Governance

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

27th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Transmit Security

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

24th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Access (28th), Access Management (22nd), Passwordless Authentication (5th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Identity Management (IM) category, the mindshare of OpenText Identity Governance is 1.4%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Transmit Security is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity Management (IM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Transmit Security	0.7%
OpenText Identity Governance	1.4%
Other	97.9%

Identity Management (IM)

Featured Reviews

GustavoAbaurre

IDM Consultant at GCA Consultoria de Informática Ltda

Helps to run reports and verify user access but improvement is needed in integration

You can run reports and verify the access each user has. There is a process that runs automatically for access review. It sends an email to the manager and provides a task for the manager to review the users and access. The manager can approve or reject, and then it goes to the application owner for further review. This feature is especially important in large customer environments, as manual review can be challenging. The product allows you to check if a user has two accesses that should not be granted simultaneously. There's an approval process for this scenario. Primarily, it provides information for governance data.

Read full review

reviewer2804310

Lead Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Journey orchestration has improved fraud prevention but still needs shared rules and better usability

The main improvement needed is that with the tool, you have to build rules for each and every application. There is no common place where you can write the rules and use that rule for all your applications, which is missing. This is a big feature that is missing compared to the other products in the market. Additionally, the SDKs, Journey Player, and other components are not business-friendly, so you really have to be technical to get into it and do those things. A non-technical person would find it really hard to implement and learn things inside Transmit Security. Even though it requires less coding, you still have to have some technical people in your team to really write the rules and integrate those rules into your application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Anytime an IGA solution is implemented effectively, there is a huge return on investment."

"NetIQ Identity Governance has improved the security of my company."

"NetIQ Identity Governance helps to prepare audits and to be audit ready every time."

"I really like the separation of the duties. It is the most ambitious model in the server because you have to create all the different rules, especially business rules. You have to check with the client and set different policies and rules, and then, you to have refine them. You will notice what is bad in the company and where the real problem is."

"I really like the separation of the duties."

"You can run reports and verify the access each user has. There is a process that runs automatically for access review. It sends an email to the manager and provides a task for the manager to review the users and access. The manager can approve or reject, and then it goes to the application owner for further review. This feature is especially important in large customer environments, as manual review can be challenging."

"This solution has been around for a long time. It has had lots of successful deployments and releases."

"When doing a review you can either make manual or automatic fulfillment to immediately apply the manager's decision to the system, like removing or adding new permissions to the user account."

More OpenText Identity Governance pros

"Transmit Security has impacted my organization positively because it is reassuring to know that we are building on top of a trusted tool, and we do not rely on developers that could make mistakes, and because it is an authentication platform, that could be detrimental."

"Transmit Security has positively impacted my organization by improving the development of workflows in order to help the user experience."

"Transmit Security has played a major role for our organization, especially in the authentication areas."

"Transmit interface is flexible and user-friendly, which is important for our workload. Switching from one authentication code to multiple exposure or two-factor authentication (MFA) is seamless."

Cons

"With NetIQ, you have to install two or more products. It would be better if we could install one product and have one server and one dashboard."

"The initial setup has room for improvement."

"Both products are separate with connectors between each other, which is a disadvantage as they were both developed by the same vendor."

"Technical support is horrible."

"Some out-of-the-box connectors are still missing. We need more connectors to cloud applications like AWS."

"The product could use more advanced features related to Identity Intelligence."

"The installation process can be improved. The Workflow Designer interface can be improved as well."

"They haven't really evolved the product to the cloud, so they don't have a cloud solution."

More OpenText Identity Governance cons

"The customer support varies, but overall, we are satisfied."

"The main improvement needed is that with the tool, you have to build rules for each and every application."

"The scalability of Transmit Security is a little bit tricky. It is not easy to scale and depends on the complexity of my workflows and how many users I am going to support."

"Pricing is an area where Transmit Security could improve. The pricing needs to be more competitive."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's expensive relative to the cloud solutions that are out there."

"In terms of pricing, the tool seems a bit cheaper compared to other SaaS solutions."

"I give the cost a nine out of ten."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

30%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Transmit Security?

I have heard that pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Transmit Security are a little bit expensive, but I am not in charge of the budget in my team, so I cannot answer that with complete certai...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Transmit Security?

I think Transmit Security can be improved by creating features that would allow the replacing of other companies such as Onfido. For example, if it would allow you to sign in by taking a selfie and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Transmit Security?

My main use case for Transmit Security is access management and identity journey coordination. A specific example of how I use Transmit Security for access management and identity journey coordinat...

See all answers

Comparisons

One Identity Manager vs OpenText Identity Governance

Compared 11% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs OpenText Identity Governance

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Identity Manager vs OpenText Identity Governance

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs OpenText Identity Governance

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence vs OpenText Identity Governance

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Identity Governance Competitors

Auth0 Platform vs Transmit Security

Compared 15% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs Transmit Security

Compared 13% of the time

EVOLVEUM midPoint vs Transmit Security

Compared 9% of the time

ForgeRock vs Transmit Security

Compared 8% of the time

TeamViewer vs Transmit Security

Compared 8% of the time

More Transmit Security Competitors

Product Reports

Identity Management (IM)

Download OpenText Identity Governance product report

Download Transmit Security product report

Also Known As

NetIQ Access Governance Suite, Novell Access Governance Suite

BindID, FlexID, WorkID

Overview

OpenText Identity Governance provides robust access review capabilities, risk analysis, and intuitive dashboards. Its advanced role mining and dynamic grouping ensure efficient access management, supporting compliance through separations of duties.

OpenText Identity Governance enhances access management and auditing processes through features such as role mining, access certification, and separations of duties that support efficient management protocols. Though it excels in stability, scalability, and integration with Identity Management solutions, it requires improvements in installation, Workflow Designer, and cloud application connectors. Addressing stability issues and offering enhanced Identity Intelligence features are essential for competitive edge. The governance tool leverages automated reporting and approval workflows, aiding large environments in streamlining management tasks. Its ability to integrate closely with NetIQ Identity Manager facilitates internal audits, particularly in banking and governmental sectors.

What are the key features?

Access Review: Manage permissions efficiently across applications.
Risk Analysis: Provides detailed risk assessment to support governance.
Advanced Role Mining: Enhance management with refined role assignments.
Dynamic Grouping: Enables efficient dynamic access adjustment.
Automated Reporting: Streamline compliance and reporting with automation.

What benefits should users look for?

Compliance Assurance: Identifies power imbalances, ensuring policy adherence.
Performance Integration: Offers seamless compatibility with IDM solutions.
Streamlined Governance: Automated processes support efficiency in large environments.
Stability and Scalability: Designed to sustain performance in growing infrastructures.

OpenText Identity Governance sees deployment in industries like banking and government, where auditing and access management are critical. It aids in permission management and account discovery, utilized notably in regions such as Chile and Argentina. Organizations benefit from its integration with NetIQ Identity Manager to ensure proper account activation and deactivation, ultimately facilitating sector-specific compliance and auditing tasks.

OpenText

Transmit Security's cloud-based platform provides comprehensive Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) services, streamlining identity and access solutions with innovative functionalities.

Transmit Security delivers a robust suite of CIAM services, focusing on identity orchestration for automated access control, detection and response for risk management, and identity management with features like single sign-on and verifications. Offering authentication services including multi-factor options, the platform ensures data validation, enhancing accuracy and fraud prevention with minimal technical complexity through its low-code approach.

What are the key features of Transmit Security?

FlexID: Tailored user experiences for identity management.
Multi-factor Authentication: Offers secure, passwordless logins.
AuthScript: Simplified programming for application flows.
Graphic Interface: Facilitates workflow development and customization.
Journey Orchestration: Enhances user interaction and fraud prevention with low-code solutions.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Customization: Allows intricate configurations for specific needs.
Security: Protects high-risk transactions and data accuracy.
User Experience: Simplified application workflows enhance interactions.
Technical Efficiency: Backend journey coordination reduces recompilation needs.

Transmit Security is widely implemented for seamless user application and access management across industries needing secure and efficient identity coordination. In sectors like finance, it helps manage customer identities and protect high-risk transactions such as bank transfers, leveraging technologies like biometrics and RESTful API integrations, although pricing and technical complexity can be challenging for some enterprises.

Sample Customers

Western & Southern Financial Group

Mitgate, Telepass, Metro Bank, Santander

OpenText Identity Governance vs. Transmit Security