OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs ZAPTEST comparison

OpenText and ZAPTEST are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.5, while ZAPTEST is ranked #30. OpenText holds a 1.9% mindshare in FT, compared to ZAPTEST’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of ZAPTEST users who would recommend it.

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

2,510 Views
1,933 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

ZAPTEST

Read 7 ZAPTEST reviews

1,420 Views
1,093 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

ZAPTEST

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web and ZAPTEST are competitors in the automated testing solutions space. Despite OpenText's advantage in pricing and support, ZAPTEST's broader automation capabilities and customer satisfaction make it a more attractive choice.

Features: OpenText focuses on mobile and web application testing, offers seamless transitions across platforms, and integrates well with existing systems. ZAPTEST provides versatile scriptless automation, extensive cross-platform functionalities, and supports scalable testing processes.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could expand beyond mobile and web testing and improve its automation capabilities. Its deployment process could be more flexible. ZAPTEST might enhance its initial setup simplicity, expand its platform integrations, and offer more competitive initial pricing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers straightforward deployment and integrates smoothly with existing systems, backed by extensive support channels. ZAPTEST’s setup is more complex but offers dedicated and personalized assistance, aligning support to specific business needs.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText is priced competitively with a moderate setup cost, offering a decent ROI due to its targeted features. ZAPTEST has a higher initial cost but promises higher ROI potential through flexible automation and scalability for large-scale projects.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ZAPTEST Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ZAPTEST

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (6th)

ZAPTEST

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

30th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 1.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ZAPTEST is 1.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	1.9%
ZAPTEST	1.5%
Other	96.6%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

it_user362916

System engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

We can write our codes just after the functional docs are prepared, and we can straight away start testing the application in the system testing phase itself.

* Using this tool, we can automate test cases even before the deployment of an application. This can be done by scanning objects from UI mock-ups or screenshots. * One script multi-run technology reduces scripting effort and budget by which you can run one unique script to test multiple platforms. * We can write one code and run it in multiple browsers (Chrome, IE, Firefox anything) and operating systems (Android, Windows, anything). * PDF validation, average colour validation, etc. are better and stable. * We can literally automate anything (not necessarily web applications) using ZAPTEST as it works exactly as a human eye and doesn't dig into application codes. * Partial OCR and block recognization are game changers. * JIRA and ALM integration

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"The ease of use and being able to enroll more people into developing test scripts using their AI function, which they call AI but is OCR recognition, is significant."

"The product is easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

"The pricing is great."

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

"This helped my prior organization immensely due to the ability to remotely manipulate devices, even by offshore vendors."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"Customer Service: This is where they truly shine! If we suggest a feature, a new version appears in days with that feature fully realized and working."

"Customer service is excellent."

"On average, I get two cycles per week and that only requires the attention of two people; it saves us a lot of time and gets us to production quicker."

"The biggest thing this product has done for us is allow us to automate a feature that other commercial and open source tools couldn't do for us."

"Customer service has been ZAPTEST's forte; very prompt and helpful."

"Our ROI is 100%."

"Using ZAPTEST, we can write our codes just after the functional docs are prepared, and we can straight away start testing the application in the system testing phase itself."

Cons

"Because of connection errors, we've haven't yet been able to set it up properly at my company."

"It's very new to HP. They need to go beyond the HP world."

"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."

"The product's object detection method needs to be improved since it can help testers do perfect testing."

"I think the interface is not very good and I have used other solutions that are easier to learn."

"However, in some cases we discovered some issues for HPE support regarding the latest enhancements; the delivery time for these enhancements is not as fast as we would like."

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

"Deployment was an issue. Each time we set it up and deployed, it failed and we had to relaunch it again."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"We cannot have more than one Object Repository for one test."

"The save function should be fixed so that I no longer have to add a space to a step and then follow it with a backspace to reenable the save icon."

"A few objects on the .NET platform are not getting identified precisely among similar objects."

"The documentation is not keeping up with the rapid development, and updates are very fast."

"I would say the test results features could be made more advanced with options like pie charts, graphs, etc. To be able to visualize the data would be helpful to us."

"We have used multiple data files types as inputs to our existing automation and this product is currently only supporting CSV."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"The product could be more affordable."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Non Profit

Manufacturing Company

18%

Construction Company

15%

Healthcare Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then rename...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 8% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs ZAPTEST

Compared 13% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs ZAPTEST

Compared 11% of the time

Sauce Labs vs ZAPTEST

Compared 6% of the time

Selenium HQ vs ZAPTEST

Compared 6% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs ZAPTEST

Compared 4% of the time

More ZAPTEST Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

June 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Buyer's Guide

ZAPTEST

May 2026

Download ZAPTEST product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

No data available

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

ZAPTEST is an advanced automation tool providing robust solutions for streamlining business processes across multiple platforms. Designed for efficiency, it offers users streamlined automation capabilities tailored to their needs.

ZAPTEST supports both functional and performance automation, enhancing business operations through comprehensive testing capabilities. Its cross-platform versatility allows users to automate web, desktop, and mobile apps, facilitating seamless integration into existing workflows. Using ZAPTEST, teams can optimize testing cycles, minimize manual intervention, and ensure consistent output quality, boosting team productivity while maintaining flexibility and scalability.

What are ZAPTEST's most valuable features?

Cross-Platform Automation: Enables users to conduct thorough testing on web, desktop, and mobile applications.
Script-Less Testing: Simplifies the automation process by allowing non-programmers to create automated tests easily.
Real-Time Reporting: Provides instant feedback, enabling quicker decision-making and issue resolution.
Parallel Execution: Facilitates simultaneous test execution to save time and resources.
API Testing: Allows for the efficient verification and performance assessment of application programming interfaces.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Automation leads to faster test cycles, saving time and resources.
Reduced Costs: By minimizing manual efforts, ZAPTEST lowers labor costs associated with testing.
Improved Accuracy: Consistent test execution reduces errors and improves software reliability.
Scalability: Easily adapts to changing business demands, supporting growth.

ZAPTEST seamlessly integrates into various industries, including finance, healthcare, and technology, adapting its functionality to meet industry-specific requirements. In finance, it enhances security and compliance testing; in healthcare, it ensures systems meet regulatory standards, while in technology, it supports fast-paced development and deployment cycles.

ZAPTEST

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

AT&T, Ally Financial, Inc. Standard & Poors, Comcast, Boeing Employee Credit Union, Nordstroms, Bank of New Zealand, Aviva France, Delta Airlines, First National Bank of South Africa, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, American Well, SuperValu, 24 Hour Fitness, Inc., Lexis Nexis, Cspire Wireless, GE Intelligent Systems, Accenture, Shelter Mutual Insurance, Agco

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ZAPTEST

June 2026

Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ZAPTEST

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ZAPTEST and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ZAPTEST report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.