IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

OpenText Content Suite Platform vs Saperion comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Both Open Text ECM and IBM File share are expensive."
  • More OpenText Content Suite Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    622,063 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Both OpenText ECM and IBM FileNet share are expensive.
    Top Answer:Pricing could be improved and the stability or the performance needs improvement, which is very important.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    6,398
    Comparisons
    4,749
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    493
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    341
    Comparisons
    193
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Livelink ECM, OpenText ECM, OpenText Content Suite
    Hyland Saperion, Hyland Saperion ECM, Saperion ECM
    Learn More
    Overview

    OpenText Enterprise Information Management (EIM) technologies and business solutions allow organizations to take full advantage of enterprise information and gain better business insight, create a positive business impact, increase process velocity, reduce risks related to information governance, and protect intellectual property from internal leaks and external threats. OpenText provides solutions in the core EIM categories of ECM, BPM, CEM, Information Exchange, and Discovery.

    The Saperion Enterprise Content Management platform not only provides immediate access to documents, it also allows them to be managed safely throughout their life cycle. This enables businesses to increase their efficiency and meet compliance requirements faster.

    Offer
    Learn more about OpenText Content Suite Platform
    Learn more about Saperion
    Sample Customers
    KUKA Roboter GmbH, MAN Diesel & Turbo, FMC Technologies, Alcatel-Lucent, KHS GmbH, The Black Sea Trade and Development Bank, COMM-UNITY EDV GmbH, BwFuhrparkService GmbH, Swarovski, Hydro One, Viega
    CSL Behring
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Comms Service Provider16%
    Government9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Insurance Company11%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise66%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise56%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    July 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Box, OpenText and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: July 2022.
    622,063 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText Content Suite Platform is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews while Saperion is ranked 22nd in Enterprise Content Management. OpenText Content Suite Platform is rated 9.0, while Saperion is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Content Suite Platform writes "Scalable, verifies complex solutions, and the support we receive is good". On the other hand, OpenText Content Suite Platform is most compared with OpenText Documentum, IBM FileNet, SharePoint, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco, whereas Saperion is most compared with Hyland OnBase and SharePoint.

    See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.