No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Ontraport vs Pega CRM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ontraport
Ranking in CRM
120th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Pega CRM
Ranking in CRM
38th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
CRM Customer Engagement Centers (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the CRM category, the mindshare of Ontraport is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pega CRM is 0.8%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
CRM Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Pega CRM0.8%
Ontraport0.3%
Other98.9%
CRM
 

Featured Reviews

Use Ontraport?
Leave a review
Srinivas Ganisetti - PeerSpot reviewer
AVP/Sr Analyst Apps at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Case management feature is valuable but the pricing is expensive
I would like to suggest the solution but it really depends on your specific requirements, your business use cases and future plans. There is a significant investment involved in this solution and therefore it is very crucial to reevaluate your future necessity including automation potential and modernization plans. I would suggest that you select any kind of solution and explore alternatives of similar functionalities at a lower cost. This might help you to achieve more with less. In my experience, I would rate it between seven to eight because it offers robust capabilities. But please be aware that other BPM tools are emerging with similar features at a lower cost. Pega CRM is perceived as bulk care compared to order tools, as many of its capabilities are potentially underutilized. I would rate it 7 out of 10.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CRM solutions are best for your needs.
892,487 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
19%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Construction Company
7%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise8
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Pega CRM?
The product's deployment phase was easy.
What needs improvement with Pega CRM?
The disadvantage of the tool stems from the fact that it does not allow users to make database-level modifications. In Siebel CRM, you have complete control over your database, you can do any datab...
What is your primary use case for Pega CRM?
Pega CRM uses a layer cake architecture. Basically, the tool is a convenient application to use even if you are not a technical person, like a business analyst. I use the solution for the CRM modul...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Chordiant
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Atlassian 2. Dropbox 3. HubSpot 4. Intercom 5. Salesforce 6. Shopify 7. Twilio 8. Spotify 9. Amazon 10. eBay 11. Etsy 12. Nike 13. Nordstrom 14. Target 15. Walmart 16. Marketing agencies 17. 360i 18. Blue Acorn 19. Edelman 20. Havas 21. Ogilvy 22. Wunderman Thompson 23. American Red Cross 24. Greenpeace 25. Oxfam 26. Planned Parenthood 27. The Salvation Army 28. World Wildlife Fund 29. U.S. Department of Defense 30. U.S. Department of Education 31. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 32. U.S. Department of Justice 33. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 34. The New York Times 35. The Washington Post  26. CNN 27. BBC 28. Netflix 
The State of Maine, Aegis, Aegon, AIG Japan, ING
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Zoho and others in CRM. Updated: April 2026.
892,487 professionals have used our research since 2012.