OneLogin vs Opal comparison

One Identity and Opal Security are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. One Identity is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while Opal Security is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.5. One Identity holds a 2.8% mindshare in IAMS, compared to Opal Security’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of One Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Opal Security users who would recommend it.

OneLogin

Read 93 OneLogin reviews

10,342 Views
4,033 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Opal

Read 2 Opal reviews

896 Views
681 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OneLogin

Opal

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

OneLogin and Opal are competing identity and access management solutions. Opal appears to have an advantage due to its advanced security features, whereas OneLogin is noted for its simplified integration methods, which may appeal more to cost-conscious buyers.

Features: OneLogin offers single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, and straightforward integration with various applications. Opal provides robust security controls, detailed access management, and advanced policy enforcements, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing security.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OneLogin delivers a user-friendly deployment model with quick setup and effective customer support. Opal requires more configuration but offers extensive support for custom implementations, catering to businesses needing tailored solutions.

Pricing and ROI: OneLogin presents competitive pricing options focusing on lowering entry barriers with cost-effective plans, resulting in quicker ROI. Opal's higher upfront costs are offset by long-term savings through enhanced security measures and compliance benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed OneLogin vs. Opal Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin vs. Opal

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OneLogin

Ranking in User Provisioning Software

4th

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

3rd

Ranking in Access Management

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (5th), Identity Management (IM) (4th)

Opal

Ranking in User Provisioning Software

11th

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

20th

Ranking in Access Management

19th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of OneLogin is 2.8%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Opal is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OneLogin	2.8%
Opal	1.0%
Other	96.2%

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Amit Rathod

Senior Analyst - IDAM at Toll Holdings Limited

Unified sign-in has simplified access control and has supported end-to-end identity lifecycle

The authentication process is good, but sometimes the responsiveness to requests for enhancement is very slow. I sometimes face issues with platform stability, flexibility in configuration, and limited API availability. I experience downtimes two to three times per year. OneLogin's support team is sometimes very slow to respond. There is a feature limitation with mapping, as OneLogin does not provide one-to-all mapping. For client deployment, we need to create separate mappings for each request, and we cannot use the same mapping for multiple requests. Other areas that have room for improvement are related to API limitations. If a client requires more APIs, such as 5,000 or 6,000, OneLogin charges more. The API rate limits by default or the standard limit should provide more than 5,000. Additionally, OneLogin could provide more flexibility in configuration. These are the main limitations I have identified with OneLogin.

Read full review

Pranay Jain

Senior Software Developer at hireHQ

Focused workdays have replaced doomscrolling and now reduce my daily screen time significantly

Opal can be improved in some ways. In the paid version, there are multiple features, but in the freemium version, there are fewer features. The blockage of the application can be more rigorous. Right now, if we play two to three games, then a math game or anything, we are able to remove that lock. It should be more rigorous in some manner, and for some applications, it should be more rigorous. Application-wise rigorousness should be introduced. The different modes are good, but they should be more customizable according to the person. The end goal should meet whatever the objective is, so if the person has used more than six hours, then it should remind the person frequently that this application has used this time and this is an application you should not use. It should give us a timer or some kind of notification that the person will not use it anymore.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"OneLogin's ability to provide a seamless end-user experience for signing in and authenticating to needed applications is pretty good."

"OneLogin has positively impacted my organization by helping reduce issues and save time."

"We are receiving good feedback from end-users for the seamless authentication, as they are very happy with the solution; they do not need to provide passwords multiple times for different applications, only needing to log in once to access all their provided applications, resulting in an excellent user experience."

"This product has removed barriers for users to log into multiple services, so it provides a better user experience."

"Simplicity is the most valuable part of OneLogin."

"I feel that switching to OneLogin is a good move for us in terms of centralized access and identity management, and since we have transitioned to OneLogin, it has greatly reduced our manual work and offloaded much of our IT tasks."

"OneLogin has really saved our IT team efforts and the management of the solution, and we are able to easily deploy or de-provision users or employees in our organization."

"The solution helped save money for our organization, either by optimizing time-intensive processes or by increasing productivity."

More OneLogin pros

"Opal has positively impacted my organization by reducing stress and increasing effectiveness for all our employees; it works better so all our employees have more time to sleep and they can investigate more."

"Previously, my phone usage was around nine hours and fifteen minutes or more, but it has significantly reduced to around six hours and thirty minutes to seven hours, meaning two and a half to three hours has been reduced after using Opal as my primary screen time blocker."

Cons

"Overall, OneLogin is solid, but we can implement some improvements with Active Directory connectors."

"I sometimes face issues with platform stability, flexibility in configuration, and limited API availability."

"OneLogin could be improved if there were easy configuration options."

"OneLogin could be improved with simpler user management features, though the current interface is relatively straightforward to use."

"The solution keeps going down for many hours, which impacts the entire company. You can't access any applications. OneLogin Desktop has a huge problem where it locks your computers and you need to reset the whole computer, which is pretty insane."

"OneLogin's reporting and dashboard customization could be more flexible, and troubleshooting federation or integration issues can sometimes take more effort than expected."

"OneLogin could be improved with more add-ins for integration with Entra ID and Exchange Online."

"Sometimes there is a slight delay in getting the code, but overall it is smooth and reliable."

More OneLogin cons

"Opal can be improved in some ways."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Surprisingly expensive given the price of on-premise solutions."

"It was cheap in the beginning, and then it became very expensive. We were initially charged $2 per user per month, which was fine, but by the second year, they increased it to $5 per user. That became very expensive for us because we had about 1,500 users. At $2 per user, it comes out to be $3,000 a month, which is $36,000 a year. If we move to $5 per user, it comes out to be $7,500 a month. That made its cost so high. That is why we removed the product because the cost was high."

"OneLogin's pricing, from the perspective of the education sector, seems quite reasonable for the value it delivers."

"The pricing for OneLogin seems to be okay. The pricing and licensing are affordable. If you'd consider OneLogin to be expensive, it's worth it."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable. It is much cheaper than other products."

"While I wish OneLogin's pricing was more affordable, their licensing model, which is based on per user, is acceptable."

"We were happy with the price we got when we signed up, but I don't know what will happen when the time comes to renew because it is a different company now. We haven't seen any pricing models or had that discussion yet. My renewal is a year and a half away. It's worth what we're paying for it. There's no way we could provide the level of service for cheaper or try to do the same in-house."

"The price of the licensing is fine."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	123
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	66

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with OneLogin by One Identity?

During implementation, there were not many features that I remember not using in practice. Mostly, there were certain APIs that we were experimenting with earlier but did not use, so we created cus...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OneLogin by One Identity?

My main use case for OneLogin is to enforce workforce identity, and we implemented this in Malaysia's biggest retail client, so all of their employees' applications can be securely accessed through...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering OneLogin by One Identity?

When I am working in OneLogin on a normal day or week, the first thing I typically do in the platform is handling SSO configurations, so I add applications and interact with application stakeholder...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Opal?

The paid version is a little costly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Opal?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Opal?

The main use case of Opal for me is to reduce my screen time during my work hours, during my wake-up time, and during my sleeping time to improve my focus and feasibility towards my work and my act...

See all answers

Comparisons

Okta Platform vs OneLogin

Compared 8% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs OneLogin

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs OneLogin

Compared 5% of the time

LastPass Business vs OneLogin

Compared 5% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs OneLogin

Compared 4% of the time

More OneLogin Competitors

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Opal

Compared 22% of the time

Okta Platform vs Opal

Compared 20% of the time

ConductorOne vs Opal

Compared 14% of the time

Idira IGA vs Opal

Compared 13% of the time

AWS IAM Identity Center vs Opal

Compared 13% of the time

More Opal Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin

June 2026

Download OneLogin product report

Buyer's Guide

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

June 2026

Download Opal product report

Also Known As

OneLogin Workforce Identity

No data available

Overview

OneLogin offers organizations a user-friendly platform for single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and seamless access management. It enhances security and streamlines processes, making it vital for application management.

Designed for ease of integration, OneLogin helps organizations efficiently manage access and improve cybersecurity through centralized application management. It simplifies onboarding and offboarding, enhancing remote work capabilities and offering robust user mapping. Users appreciate seamless integration and reliable logs. However, it could improve with enhanced technical support, more out-of-box connectors, and better customization options. Challenges with device management and system integrations have been noted, with legacy application support and infrastructure stability needing attention.

What are the key features of OneLogin?

Single Sign-On: Provides centralized access to applications.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security with multiple verification steps.
Self-Service Password Resets: Empowers users to manage their passwords.
Ease of Integration: Connects seamlessly with cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits can users expect?

Improved Time Management: Streamlines user access processes.
Reduced Security Incidents: Strengthens authentication measures.
Efficient Interface: Facilitates smooth user navigation.
Enhanced Remote Work: Supports flexible workforce needs.

Organizations employ OneLogin for single sign-on and identity management, connecting users to applications like CRM and Slack. It supports role-based access control and seamless cloud transition, integrating with Active Directory to enhance user management in industries demanding strong security and efficiency.

One Identity

Opal is a comprehensive platform for identity access management and compliance automation. It excels in streamlining access control, audit preparation, and compliance tracking. Key features include an intuitive interface, robust security measures, and real-time collaboration, significantly improving organizational efficiency and productivity.

Opal Security

Sample Customers

OneLogin has thousands of customers across multiple industries and from around the globe such as Uber, Airbnb, Noom, Petco, Sony, Lucky Brand, Tesco, Airbus, Japan Airlines, Aetna, Compass, Kaplan, Susan G. Komen, AAA and PennyMac.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin vs. Opal

June 2026

Free Report: OneLogin vs. Opal

Find out what your peers are saying about OneLogin vs. Opal and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OneLogin vs. Opal report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors, best User Provisioning Software vendors, and best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.