OneLogin by One Identity vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

OneLogin by One Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform

Download the complete report

Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OneLogin by One Identity

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

9th

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

8th

Ranking in Access Management

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Provisioning Software (7th), Identity Management (IM) (11th)

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

3rd

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

5th

Ranking in Access Management

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (7th), Data Governance (8th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (2nd), Directory Servers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of OneLogin by One Identity is 2.8%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 7.0%, down from 9.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Ping Identity Platform	7.0%
OneLogin by One Identity	2.8%
Other	90.2%

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

Ben Ruset

Senior Director of Infrastructure at Whip Media

Streamlines access management with top-notch support, and a user-friendly interface, making it a highly effective solution for businesses of all sizes

During my evaluation of various products, one standout feature of OneLogin that impressed me was their mobile app for authentication through push notifications. Unlike traditional methods involving rotating codes, the OneLogin app simplifies the process by sending a push notification asking if the login attempt is legitimate. If confirmed, the login proceeds seamlessly. The primary benefit is its user-friendly interface, making it particularly accessible for non-technical users. One aspect I particularly appreciate is their exceptional customer support whenever I've needed assistance. Their sales team has also been highly responsive and helpful in connecting me with necessary resources, although we haven't faced any major challenges.

Read full review

MAHESHKUMAR7

Cyber Security Engineer at TECHMINDZ DIGITAL CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED

Offers multi-factor authentication and application support side of PingFederate but application only supports specific protocols

A lot of teams work with technical support, but I work with it for user issues only. You might need support with things like application swaps, application names, and application URLs. I didn't know where to find those in Ping Identity, so I contacted technical support for those issues. The support team is very clever and active. They provide end-to-end support once an issue is created. I have worked with most of the support team. I also work with the support team because I work with the operations team. I provide 24/7 support to production and non-production environments. I coordinate with application and network teams to troubleshoot critical tickets and issues related to Ping Identity solutions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the ease with which we can manage the sign-on feature."

"One aspect I particularly appreciate is their exceptional customer support whenever I've needed assistance."

"Simplicity is the most valuable part of OneLogin."

"Ease of integration with AD."

"Documentation."

"OneLogin is efficient."

"The directory integration and SCIM provisioning are probably the best features compared to competitors."

"Once I made the OneLogin ID, it would essentially make user names and passwords for every application that we had."

More OneLogin by One Identity pros

"I find the auto-discovery feature the most valuable. It helps us automate a lot of things using a single password across applications."

"I work on the application onboarding process because we have multiple customers and get data from different sources."

"Setting up the infrastructure with Ping Identity Platform is very easy compared to other IAM products."

"The only feature we were looking for in PingID was SSO integration with our existing web app."

"PingFederate is very flexible. We can do many customizations, and it also provides an SDK to tailor it to our specific requirements. There are also numerous plugins available. I've worked with tools like ForgeRock and Okta, but I find PingFederate to be the most customizable."

"It's convenient for users to log in through Ping using the Kerberos adapter because it doesn't require them to authenticate again."

"This is a user-friendly solution."

"The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging in."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

Cons

"The tool must be made more robust."

"OneLogin needs to increase the number of connectors available out of the box to connect to the different endpoints. The number of out-of-box connectors should be increased."

"To offboard, you have to manually click on this checklist, each of the checkmarks. It would actually be really nice if, for offboarding someone, you just click "offboard" and it automatically runs a script to do that."

"We've been experiencing some pain points since the acquisition. For example, there have been some outages we didn't see previously, which are a big topic with my executive team. You have hundreds of applications relying on this service for login. If the service is unavailable, nobody can log into these applications."

"The uptime has not been great recently, with some outages lasting six, seven, or eight hours."

"having a RESTful implementation instead of RPC would have been more desirable."

"They have downtime twice a year or once in six months. During the downtime, the SSO page did not come up. When users wanted to get to their email, they were redirected to the OneLogin page, but the page did not come up, and MFA and logins failed. It completely crippled us."

"More off-hour support."

More OneLogin by One Identity cons

"PingID should put a little more effort into making a pretty self-explanatory deck about their tech features and the services they offer."

"Sometimes, there are issues with its stability."

"It requires some expertise to set up and manage."

"PingFederate's UI could be streamlined. They have recently made several improvements, but it's still too complex. It's a common complaint. The configuration should be simplified because the learning curve is too steep."

"We can choose a drop-down to search for which certificate we have to create, which is difficult."

"The solution should allow for better integration with other platforms and the UBT."

"One significant challenge was ensuring smooth user migration during system upgrades in Ping."

"In Ping Identity, we have had some issues. We've worked with logging and troubleshooting, including some firewall and security issues."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable. It is much cheaper than other products."

"It was cheap in the beginning, and then it became very expensive. We were initially charged $2 per user per month, which was fine, but by the second year, they increased it to $5 per user. That became very expensive for us because we had about 1,500 users. At $2 per user, it comes out to be $3,000 a month, which is $36,000 a year. If we move to $5 per user, it comes out to be $7,500 a month. That made its cost so high. That is why we removed the product because the cost was high."

"We were happy with the price we got when we signed up, but I don't know what will happen when the time comes to renew because it is a different company now. We haven't seen any pricing models or had that discussion yet. My renewal is a year and a half away. It's worth what we're paying for it. There's no way we could provide the level of service for cheaper or try to do the same in-house."

"Surprisingly expensive given the price of on-premise solutions."

"While I wish OneLogin's pricing was more affordable, their licensing model, which is based on per user, is acceptable."

"The price of the licensing is fine."

"OneLogin's pricing, from the perspective of the education sector, seems quite reasonable for the value it delivers."

"The pricing for OneLogin seems to be okay. The pricing and licensing are affordable. If you'd consider OneLogin to be expensive, it's worth it."

"Ping Identity Platform is not an expensive solution."

"The product is costly."

"PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."

"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"The tool is quite affordable."

"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about OneLogin by One Identity?

OneLogin is efficient.

What needs improvement with OneLogin by One Identity?

There have been some outages over the years. The uptime has not been great recently, with some outages lasting six, seven, or eight hours. Improvement in the stability of the infrastructure would b...

What is your primary use case for OneLogin by One Identity?

We use OneLogin by One Identity to provide SAML authentication and single sign-on for all of our SaaS apps.

What do you like most about PingID?

The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?

The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

What needs improvement with PingID?

The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.

Microsoft Entra ID vs OneLogin by One Identity

Comparisons

Compared 16% of the time

LastPass Business vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 14% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 11% of the time

Auth0 vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 9% of the time

Tools4ever HelloID vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 7% of the time

More OneLogin by One Identity Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 19% of the time

ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 8% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Symantec Siteminder vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 7% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Product Reports

OneLogin by One Identity

Download OneLogin by One Identity product report

Ping Identity Platform

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Also Known As

OneLogin, OneLogin Workforce Identity

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

Overview

OneLogin by One Identity is a cloud-based access management solution for the modern enterprise. It delivers secure access for every user, every app and every device to meet an organization’s Workforce and Customer and Identity and Access Management (CIAM) needs.

OneLogin provides secure single sign-on, multi-factor authentication (supporting a wide array of passwordless authentication factors), adaptive authentication, desktop-level MFA, directory integration with AD, LDAP, G Suite and other external directories, identity lifecycle management and much more. OneLogin advanced authentication capabilities provide multi-layer, context aware and risk-based protection, minimizing the most common attacks and resulting in increased security, a frictionless user experience, and compliance with regulatory requirements. Furthermore, OneLogin’s user-friendly interface and streamlined design make it easy for end users and IT administrators to navigate the platform and remain productive.

One Identity

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

Ping Identity

Sample Customers

OneLogin has thousands of customers across multiple industries and from around the globe such as Uber, Airbnb, Noom, Petco, Sony, Lucky Brand, Tesco, Airbus, Japan Airlines, Aetna, Compass, Kaplan, Susan G. Komen, AAA and PennyMac.

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

OneLogin by One Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform