No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

One Identity Cloud PAM Essentials vs Sectona Privileged Access Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

One Identity Cloud PAM Esse...
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
38th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Sectona Privileged Access M...
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
27th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of One Identity Cloud PAM Essentials is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sectona Privileged Access Management is 1.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Sectona Privileged Access Management1.0%
One Identity Cloud PAM Essentials0.9%
Other98.1%
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Use One Identity Cloud PAM Essentials?
Leave a review
Pankaj-Mishra - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior IT Security Engineer at Mahindra Group
Effective risk management, feature of recording all privileged user activities in a compressed format but limited SaaS capability
There are some areas where the GUI could be improved to make it easier to find and update privileged settings and policies. For example, when creating a PAM policy for Privileged, some of the scroll boxes are difficult to navigate. It would be easier if there were one-click options for checking and unchecking boxes rather than having to scroll down and select individual items. This would make the GUI more user-friendly for administrators and SOC teams. So, I would like to see the GUI made more user-friendly, especially for administrators and SOC teams. In future releases, I would like to be able to manage Sectona PAM by location. For example, I'm the global headquarters lead in India, and we have 200 locations around the world. I would like to be able to create sub-locations, so that when I click on support for a location, the configuration is separate. However, the monitoring should still be at the parent level.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
899,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Healthcare Company
11%
Construction Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Okta and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: May 2026.
899,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.