Octopus Deploy vs Spinnaker comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Octopus Deploy Logo
1,706 views|1,214 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Spinnaker Logo
216 views|151 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Octopus Deploy and Spinnaker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Release Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Octopus Deploy vs. Spinnaker Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The UI is very intuitive.""The rollback feature has been most valuable. We can write scripts from scratch. Octopus maintains an independent package for every deployment.""Deployment is valuable. It deploys well."

More Octopus Deploy Pros →

"There is a good community around the product that makes troubleshooting possible.""The most valuable feature of Spinnaker is the rollback."

More Spinnaker Pros →

Cons
"This solution could be improved by making it easier to divide variables in YAML file or JSON files.""You've got to jump through a few hoops to get some things configured, but if set up, you can do so many different things in it. So, there is complexity.""There could be scope for more integration with other platforms."

More Octopus Deploy Cons →

"Log-wise, we need to understand why something has failed so that we can understand and try to fix it the moment the issue is reported. The solution could use more robust monitoring.""Spinnaker's configuration setup is too complicated and should be made easy."

More Spinnaker Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I don't know the exact cost, but it's not exorbitant. It may be a couple of thousand dollars a year or something like that. I'm not sure, but it's reasonable. We get value for money out of it."
  • More Octopus Deploy Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Spinnaker is a free-to-use, open-source solution."
  • More Spinnaker Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Deployment is valuable. It deploys well.
    Top Answer:You've got to jump through a few hoops to get some things configured, but if set up, you can do so many different things in it. So, there is complexity.
    Top Answer:We're a DevOps team., and its use case is deployment. That's the only thing it does. Our version is relatively recent.
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Spinnaker is the rollback.
    Top Answer:Spinnaker is a free-to-use, open-source solution. We just need to pay for the servers where it is deployed.
    Top Answer:Spinnaker's configuration setup is too complicated and should be made easy. While configuring Spinnaker, we need to get a CLI tool called Halyard.
    Ranking
    8th
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Views
    1,706
    Comparisons
    1,214
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    402
    Rating
    8.0
    7th
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Views
    216
    Comparisons
    151
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    650
    Rating
    9.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Spinnaker
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Octopus Deploy is the most popular deployment automation tool in the world. Our software is used by teams to deploy .NET, Java, Node, and database applications, to hundreds and thousands of servers in the cloud and on-premises.

    Spinnaker provides application management and deployment to help you release software changes with high velocity and confidence. Spinnaker is an open-source, multi-cloud continuous delivery platform that combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers. If you are looking to standardize your release processes and improve quality, Spinnaker is for you.

    Sample Customers
    Microsoft, NASA, Cisco, Domain, HP, Symantec, 3M, Philips
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization33%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Computer Software Company19%
    Retailer9%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise39%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise77%
    Buyer's Guide
    Octopus Deploy vs. Spinnaker
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Octopus Deploy vs. Spinnaker and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Octopus Deploy is ranked 8th in Release Automation with 3 reviews while Spinnaker is ranked 7th in Release Automation with 2 reviews. Octopus Deploy is rated 8.0, while Spinnaker is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Octopus Deploy writes "Easy to set up with intuitive UI and good reliability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spinnaker writes "Good integrations, a helpful user community, and good reliability". Octopus Deploy is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, UrbanCode Deploy and GitLab, whereas Spinnaker is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, AWS CodeDeploy and UrbanCode Deploy. See our Octopus Deploy vs. Spinnaker report.

    See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.