Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Object First Ootbi vs StoneFly SCVM comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Pure Storage FlashBlade
Sponsored
Ranking in File and Object Storage
8th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
All-Flash Storage (15th), Software Defined Storage (SDS) (8th)
Object First Ootbi
Ranking in File and Object Storage
26th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
StoneFly SCVM
Ranking in File and Object Storage
34th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the File and Object Storage category, the mindshare of Pure Storage FlashBlade is 5.7%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Object First Ootbi is 1.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StoneFly SCVM is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
File and Object Storage Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Pure Storage FlashBlade5.7%
Object First Ootbi1.0%
StoneFly SCVM0.2%
Other93.1%
File and Object Storage
 

Featured Reviews

MikaelHellström - PeerSpot reviewer
Has handled backup storage needs reliably and supports seamless upgrades
In environments requiring high throughput and low latency, Pure Storage FlashBlade provides high throughput and normal latency, but we do not have any application that requires low latency right now, so the latency of three to five milliseconds is considered kind of high. Pure Storage FlashBlade's ability to integrate with enterprise applications is not important for us, as we only want to present an S3 bucket for our backup, which we have done, and it works very fast. We use the Purity software's data reduction techniques; we have a backup software that compresses everything before sending it to the S3 bucket, achieving a data reduction of 1.1 to one. I would recommend Pure Storage FlashBlade to other companies because it's a very fast and scalable solution for anyone who needs it. On a scale of 1-10, I rate this solution an 8.
Use Object First Ootbi?
Share your opinion
Use StoneFly SCVM?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
871,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Government
10%
Hospitality Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise21
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pure Storage FlashBlade?
The tool's most valuable feature is its fast performance, especially in handling snapshots. It helps during power out...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure Storage FlashBlade?
The pricing of Pure Storage FlashBlade is expensive compared to other products I used from other companies in the pas...
What needs improvement with Pure Storage FlashBlade?
I believe there is not much improvement needed because they have everything we need, but the interface is a little bi...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ServiceNow, Mercedes-AMG Petronas Motorsport, Dominos, Man AHL
1. ABN AMRO 2. Accenture 3. AIG 4. Airbus 5. Allianz 6. American Express 7. Aon 8. AstraZeneca 9. AT&T 10. Bank of America 11. Boeing 12. Citigroup 13. Coca-Cola 14. Comcast 15. Dell Technologies 16. Eni 17. Ericsson 18. Ford Motor Company 19. General Electric 20. Google 21. Hewlett Packard Enterprise 22. IBM 23. Intel 24. Johnson & Johnson 25. JPMorgan Chase 26. Kellogg's 27. L'Oréal 28. Merck 29. Nestlé 30. Nike 31. Oracle 32. Philip Morris International 33. Procter & Gamble 34. SAP 35. Siemens 36. Unilever
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Nutanix, Dell Technologies and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: October 2025.
871,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.