Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Nutanix and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Additionally, 50% of Nutanix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Nutanix Mine Integrated Bac...

Read 6 Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] reviews

50% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

8,800 Views
8,096 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Nutanix Mine Integrated Bac...

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

OpenText Data Protector and Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup compete in the enterprise data protection category. Based on user feedback, Data Protector seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive integration capabilities.

Features: OpenText Data Protector is often appreciated for its robust integration with platforms like Oracle, MSSQL, and VMware, which facilitate disaster recovery and daily backups. Its deduplication functionalities are also seen as valuable. Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is known for its simplicity and straightforward setup process, which appeals to users with less complex needs.

Room for Improvement: Users of OpenText Data Protector suggest improvements in support for newer operating systems and better cloud integration, alongside enhancements in its pricing model. Meanwhile, Nutanix Mine was noted to fall short in cloud readiness and scalability, which limits its effectiveness for enterprise-level deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector offers a versatile range of deployment options across on-premises, private, public, and hybrid clouds, but its customer service receives mixed reviews due to slow response times. Nutanix Mine stands out for its easy deployment, owing to its integrated nature, although its customer service experiences similar varied feedback.

Pricing and ROI: The licensing model of Data Protector, based on the number of integrations, can become complex and costly for smaller businesses, although its reliability justifies the cost for many. Nutanix Mine is considered expensive and might not be cost-effective for smaller enterprises, yet it maintains competitiveness in larger environments due to its simplified cost structure and satisfactory ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nutanix Mine Integrated Bac...

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Data Protector

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (47th)

Featured Reviews

Ingvar Ingason

Channel Sales Manager at Arrow Electronics

An affordable product that offers a reasonably good technical support

I rate the product's initial setup phase an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup phase. The product's installation phase took me around two weeks. On average, it usually takes about a week or two to deploy when everything is in place. The solution is deployed on a hybrid cloud from Azure.

Read full review

Ahmad-Hassan

Project Manager And Technical Consultant at EEMC

Provides effective backup for physical servers and needs improvements for cloud compatibility

We use OpenText Data Protector for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers. It is effective for direct backups to EMC library or storage without using a repository. However,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We find the ease of use valuable."

"Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is useful for those who run an infrastructure where there might arise a need to do some transition or want to opt for digital transformation."

"Nutanix can converge legacy-style rack mount servers, so it is highly scalable."

"Our primary use case for the solution is to back up our devices and equipment for employees and some equipment in airport software."

"Nutanix has its own backup system known as HYCU, as well as its own virtual server."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...I rate the technical support a nine out of ten."

"I like the autofill-over feature and the simplicity of the solution."

"Nutanix, in my opinion, will eventually take over."

More Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] pros

"Data Protector's GUI is the most useful feature."

"Reading the manual and following instructions will result in a working version."

"It's user-friendly and not overly complicated to configure."

"Data Protector is a very mature product that allows custom backups, scheduling, and copying in a manner that reduces the amount of time spent with backups from an administrative point of view."

"I like that Micro Focus keeps a separate catalog of our data."

"Backup of SAP/Oracle -- they are more robust than the competition."

"It is really easy to backup and restore your data across all servers, something that IBM Spectrum Protect struggles to do."

"The feature I like the most is the deduplication implementation with CAPA; it's very good."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"The solution could be cheaper and they should include more education or marketing materials for users to understand how to use the solution."

"It could be cheaper."

"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The solution's setup process should be simplified."

"I would like to see the multi-cloud improve."

"Nutanix is not secure enough, and it needs to be more resilient."

"This solution could be improved with regards to the hosts that integrate with the platform itself. Each of the hosts integrated with the storage and networking only provide one instance of a backup."

"The pricing could be improved. It's an expensive solution."

"They should design the solution so that it is much easier for deployment and make the UI easy to use."

"Technical support has not been good recently and in several cases, I have found the solution myself."

"Data Protector is great software, but after we started getting support from Micro Focus, it was taking too much time, there was too much delay."

"The interface has been the same for many years and needs to be updated."

"There have been some issues."

"Integration with the market applications must be improved, such as MS Exchange, MS Active Directory, SAP and Oracle. Other backup tools are more efficient with the integrated backups."

"It is scalable. It's not as scalable as HPE would like to think it is."

"The license structure for advanced features, such as backing up to disk or compression, can make the license pretty costly."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the pricing a five out of ten because the price is average."

"While Nutanix Mine is extremely expensive for small businesses, it is a very cost-effective product for enterprise businesses."

"Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is fairly priced."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is affordable or low, and ten is expensive or high, I rate the price as two."

"Pricing/licensing is Data Protector's single best offering. In its most basic environment, the only license required is for whatever target device is required."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor very cheap."

"Avoid using many LTO drives; when using fewer drives, the price will be extremely good."

"The pricing is around $3,000 to $5,000. The charge additionally for support and to scale."

"The pricing is acceptable for enterprise level companies, but it's not acceptable for small- and medium-sized businesses. Micro Focus Data Protector is not an enterprise level solution, and it should cover small- and medium-sized businesses with acceptable prices."

"The licensing cost was not annual. We didn't pay any license. We paid when we deployed and we didn't pay for anything after that. There were no additional fees after the initial payment."

"It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great."

"The licensing cost is too high."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

11%

Educational Organization

University

Financial Services Firm

18%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Data Protector?

We use OpenText Data Protector ( /products/opentext-data-protector-reviews ) for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security.

See all answers

Comparisons

NetApp SnapCenter vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Arcserve UDP vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

N-able Cove Data Protection vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Storage Protect vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

More Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] Competitors

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft DPM vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 7% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

October 2026

Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] report

Download Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

October 2026

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

Nutanix Mine

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is a turnkey solution that makes backup infrastructure simple and invisible by combining the Nutanix Cloud Platform technology with leading enterprise backup software for dedicated data backup and recovery.

Nutanix

OpenText Data Protector offers robust integration with systems like SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange, boasting strong backup and recovery solutions across multiple environments, despite some areas needing improvement such as user-friendliness and GUI design.

OpenText Data Protector provides comprehensive data protection for servers, Linux systems, and applications including Oracle and Microsoft, alongside centralized storage management. It supports virtual, cloud, and on-premises environments, focusing on Oracle database security, HANA, and NAS appliances via NDMP. Despite its benefits, users encounter frequent errors with virtual environment backups, especially with VMware, and find the GUI outdated. Documentation needs improvement for troubleshooting, and support services face criticism for delayed responses. The licensing structure lacks flexibility, and while it supports efficient deduplication and scheduling, reporting capabilities often lead users to rely on external tools.

What are the key features of OpenText Data Protector?

Seamless Integration: Supports SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange for smooth data management.
Centralized Management: Single interface for managing complex environments with ease.
Disaster Recovery: Offers robust recovery capabilities with automated scheduling.
Diverse OS Support: Accommodates numerous operating systems, enhancing flexibility.
Detailed Reporting: Generates reports for informed decision-making and strategy improvements.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reliable Backup: Ensures data integrity and availability across platforms.
Flexibility: Adapts to changing environments and diverse IT landscapes.
Cost Efficiency: Streamlines processes to maximize ROI despite licensing costs.
Integration Quality: Works well with existing systems, reducing transition challenges.

OpenText Data Protector finds application in sectors requiring robust data protection, such as finance and healthcare, securing data in compliance-sensitive environments. Industries rely on it for protecting Oracle databases and ensuring data retention and recovery in both short- and long-term scenarios.

OpenText

Sample Customers

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Dell Technologies and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.