Nutanix Disaster Recovery vs Quorum OnQ comparison

Nutanix and Quorum are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category. Nutanix is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.8, while Quorum is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.3. Nutanix holds a 0.5% mindshare in DRS, compared to Quorum’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Nutanix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Quorum users who would recommend it.

Nutanix Disaster Recovery

Read 7 Nutanix Disaster Recovery reviews

284 Views
241 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Quorum OnQ

Read 22 Quorum OnQ reviews

972 Views
515 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Nutanix Disaster Recovery

Quorum OnQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 15, 2024

Quorum OnQ and Nutanix Disaster Recovery are competing products in the disaster recovery space. Nutanix Disaster Recovery is considered superior due to its advanced features, detailed automation, and robust scalability, justifying its higher price.

Features: Quorum OnQ provides automated testing, one-click recovery, and seamless integration. Nutanix Disaster Recovery offers advanced automation, scalability, and robust multi-cloud capabilities, which are more comprehensive for extensive disaster recovery solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Quorum OnQ features straightforward deployment and helpful customer service, making it accessible for organizations with limited IT resources. Nutanix Disaster Recovery, although more complex in deployment and requiring a learning curve, is supported by a strong customer service network to assist with integration challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Quorum OnQ has a lower setup cost, providing a favorable ROI for small to medium-sized businesses. Nutanix Disaster Recovery demands a higher upfront investment but offers greater returns through enhanced capabilities and scalability, appealing to larger enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Nutanix Disaster Recovery vs. Quorum OnQ Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Disaster Recovery vs. Quorum OnQ

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nutanix Disaster Recovery

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Quorum OnQ

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

21st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (45th), Cloud Backup (37th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of Nutanix Disaster Recovery is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quorum OnQ is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

Featured Reviews

Narasimha Reddy Illuri

VMware Administrator at Infosys

Communication improvements enhance platform reliability while seamless recovery process supports application safety

I don't currently have knowledge of the best features of Nutanix Disaster Recovery. I don't have specific features in mind that are missing in Nutanix Disaster Recovery that I would like to see included in the future. I don't find Nutanix's pricing reasonable; my higher authority manages pricing discussions. I'm not aware of the pricing as it's usually handled by delivery managers and the architect team. I don't know of any disadvantages of Nutanix outside of the technical support issues previously mentioned, as I'm still comparing it with ongoing learning. I didn't face any challenges while starting to learn Nutanix Disaster Recovery; it has been straightforward. I would recommend Nutanix Disaster Recovery as there are no issues, and I ensure to explain everything regarding application safety and functionality to the application owners. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Nutanix Disaster Recovery an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Mohamed Iqbal

Presales Information Technology Consultant at JBA

A stable and economical solution that provides quick disaster recovery

The most valuable feature of Quorum OnQ is quick recovery. We call it a single-click recovery. If any server goes down, crashes, or experiences downtime, we can bring up the DR (Disaster Recovery) server in just two minutes. We also have a "Single Pane of Glass," wherein we work with only a single window. You don't have to use multiple windows to perform basic tasks like failover or failback.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Nutanix Disaster Recovery needs to have a feature that can automate manual tasks."

"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Disaster Recovery is the local storage solution, which significantly boosts performance, especially when transitioning from traditional architecture."

"The initial setup of Nutanix Disaster Recovery is straightforward and easy."

"Nutanix Disaster Recovery can be used for snapshots, backup, and disaster recovery."

"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Disaster Recovery is the reliability and scalability of being able to swing our workloads across the country."

"The product is very simple and very easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of Quorum OnQ is quick recovery."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its ease of use."

"The most valuable feature is spinning up a ready-to-go VM in a test or production environment that is based on a backup stored on the Quorum device."

"The biggest feature is being able to do a file recovery to the original server. That is extremely useful and has saved us a few times when we've had ransomware. In some of those cases, people's computers were locked down by viruses which spread to things they had access to, including server shares. But we were easily able to just restore to four hours prior, instead of a day or two or more ago."

"A very high level security environment for secondary data."

"One of the most valuable features was the usability, since many of the features were very straightforward. The backup and restoration process was also very fast. Although we weren't able to fully test the scenarios, one of the features was that we could have it restored on a remote site. However, since we were on-prem, we weren't able to test the remote site restoration."

"When it comes to recovering what you need from a backup, it's really easy. You just drill through the directory, find the file and the date that you want, and click to recover. You then pick the directory you want to save it in. Usually, it takes a minute or two and it's done. It's quick and easy."

"The solution is very cost effective."

More Quorum OnQ pros

Cons

"The major issue with Nutanix is its appliance-based model, which can lead to vendor lock-in."

"Nutanix Disaster Recovery needs to have a feature that can automate manual tasks."

"The solution's bandwidth utilization can be improved further."

"The solution should include a standard license for the object level and file level."

"The product must allow users to create a production domain on the main site in one hypervisor and a backup site on another."

"The dashboard could be a bit refreshed, and some configuration parts could be less confusing."

"One thing that could be done to improve it would be a single pane of glass for doing disaster recovery testing, where I could have remote consoles in one place... I still have to go to each location in a browser and then bring up the console. I'd like to see them integrate that into a single pane of glass so I don't have to go to each server."

"Better integration with cloud-based solutions like Azure and Office 365 is needed."

"The one thing they could do is some tweaking on the web solution that's supposed to monitor everything from one page, rather than having to bring each server up on its own webpage. It doesn't always accurately show what the system's state is at the time, and we have to restart that process now and then."

"The user interface needs to be improved."

"Lacks compatibility in terms of supporting other OS."

"The price is high and could be more competitive."

"The price of Quorum OnQ could be improved. We were exploring the product in terms of having a partnership with the distributor so that we could operate as a service, but for our own use, within the company, we couldn't justify the price unless the servers would become an option later on. The upfront cost of purchasing a license for the hardware is quite steep."

"There was a situation I faced in the past when I contacted the tool's support team, and it took them a while to respond."

More Quorum OnQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution’s pricing is good."

"Nutanix Disaster Recovery is a cheap solution."

"The pricing is about $1,400 a month. It's a little bit on the higher side. But it's one of those situations where time is valuable for me. So if it costs a little bit more money for me to have a solution that just works and requires less of my day-to-day management, I'm willing to pay a little bit more."

"We have never questioned whether it is worth it because it so obviously is a great value."

"I am not sure how much it costs, but I know it's expensive."

"The cost is higher than other software and services, but it is an absolute must-have."

"Quorum OnQ can be described as a medium-priced product...There are no ingress and egress charges in the product."

"When we quote the price of Quorum to customers, they find it expensive."

"The total for our current solution's licensing is about $14,000 for 12 servers for three years."

"The initial expenditure for us was a little under $40,000 for the recent renewal. For the first three years after that, other than electricity, there's no cost. After that, their support contract has to be renewed annually. We spent close to $6,000, between the two offices, for support."

More Quorum OnQ pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

25%

Real Estate/Law Firm

10%

University

10%

Mining And Metals Company

Financial Services Firm

10%

Performing Arts

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Nutanix Disaster Recovery?

Nutanix Disaster Recovery can be used for snapshots, backup, and disaster recovery.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nutanix Disaster Recovery?

I usually discuss improvements with my team who handle on-site deployments, and I plan to gather their insights. However, currently, there is nothing significant lacking in the solution as per my t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nutanix Disaster Recovery?

The primary use case of Nutanix Disaster Recovery ( /products/nutanix-disaster-recovery-reviews ) is to prevent the infrastructure from a major catastrophic failure at the primary site. If the prim...

See all answers

What do you like most about Quorum OnQ?

It is a very scalable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quorum OnQ?

It's a little expensive. That said, the cost aligns with other advocacy tools we have evaluated.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quorum OnQ?

They have radio buttons that allow multiselection, which is not intuitive. Also, the URL for our environments is the same, making it confusing for management when handling different departments wit...

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery

Compared 72% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery

Compared 28% of the time

More Nutanix Disaster Recovery Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 41% of the time

N-able Cove Data Protection vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 13% of the time

Precisely Assure MIMIX vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 13% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Manager vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 12% of the time

Rubrik vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 11% of the time

More Quorum OnQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Disaster Recovery

August 2025

Download Nutanix Disaster Recovery product report

Buyer's Guide

Quorum OnQ

August 2025

Download Quorum OnQ product report

Also Known As

No data available

OnQ

Overview

Nutanix Disaster Recovery is a natively integrated DR solution that helps organizations stay prepared in the face of a disaster while minimizing data loss and downtime.

Nutanix

Quorum onQ is the global leader in 1-click instant recovery, providing full immediate recovery of your critical systems after any storage, system or site failure. It does this by automatically maintaining up-to-date, ready-to-run virtual machine clones of your physical and virtual servers stored on a dedicated appliance – clones that will transparently take over for failed servers within minutes.

Quorum

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

LCL Bulk Transport

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Disaster Recovery vs. Quorum OnQ

July 2025

Free Report: Nutanix Disaster Recovery vs. Quorum OnQ

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix Disaster Recovery vs. Quorum OnQ and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nutanix Disaster Recovery vs. Quorum OnQ report.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.