Spring MVC vs npm comparison

"The product's most valuable feature is dependency installation."

"The most valuable feature of NPM is to trigger APMs."

"The reversal build, gendered build, migrated PCA, and CT features are excellent."

"It's an open-source setting that's very scalable and easily approachable. I like that you can plug in many features to my product."

"The solution is scalable."

"The best feature of Spring MVC is its auto-configuration capabilities."

"Spring MVC is fast and reliable."

"The most valuable feature is simplicity."

"Dependency Injection is one of the major features which makes our life easier using Spring. It is well documented and has active communities, which provide us enormous help."

"We have found Spring is easy to use and learn."

"The most valuable feature of Spring MVC is the configuration, such as WAF."

"Spring gives you the opportunity to develop architecture in the simplest way possible. It comes with everything you would want in terms of security. If you want to access the database, you have the ability to do that."

"The solution is open-source and free to use."

"I would like to see compatible versions, and what new features they will be providing. If it is a useful feature I can merge it. If it is not a usable feature, then I can ignore the newer version."

"NPM can improve the package manager. For the packages we download for our APM studio to trigger our APM driver, it would benefit if we could have the latest version of NuGet Package Manager within the package manager control. For example, Visual Studio would be good. Then it would be easy for us to get the package manager from there instead of Googling it out and matching it with the current version. It would be less time-consuming for us."

"The product should be compatible with various programming languages, including both native and upcoming languages."

"Some of the libraries that we try to use in npm have issues with security. Also, because it's an open-source solution, I think there are lots of challenges with security. So, the security layer could be improved."

"The library could be updated."

"Spring IDE​ needs some work and improvement. We have faced many issues when adding third-party Eclipse plugins."

"I have recently had problems with the changes that were made using Spring Security."

"It could provide faster performance."

"The documentation for Spring MVC could improve."

"It can be difficult for a basic user to understand the concepts in this solution, such as inversion of control."

"Adding more modules takes about 10 to 15 minutes each. It would be nice if they could reduce that part. The deployment time is a little high."

"The solution could be simplified quite a bit. It's unnecessarily complicated in some areas."

"The newer versions of Spring MVC have released a lot of features that we are not using right now because, in many cases, we are limited to running older versions. As such, it would be nice if Spring were to improve support for upgrading to newer versions, especially for legacy applications."

"NPM is an open-source solution."

"We use the open-source version, so it is free."

"The licensing cost is around one hundred and fifty dollars on a quarterly basis."

"It's an open-source solution, and there are no hidden fees."

"We are using the open-source version of the solution."

"It is an open-source solution."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no license costs involved with using it."

"Spring MVC is open source and free."

"The solution is free."