Spring Boot vs npm comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitHub Logo
174 views|41 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
VMware Logo
28,805 views|18,749 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between npm and Spring Boot based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Java Frameworks solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Spring Boot vs. npm Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product's most valuable feature is dependency installation.""The most valuable feature of NPM is to trigger APMs.""It's an open-source setting that's very scalable and easily approachable. I like that you can plug in many features to my product.""The solution is scalable.""The reversal build, gendered build, migrated PCA, and CT features are excellent."

More npm Pros →

"It is stable.""The setup is straightforward.""It gives you confidence in a readily available platform.""The simplicity is excellent.""Spring Boot's configuration is easy, and it has an out-of-the-box deployment.""Spring Boot could improve its integration with the major cloud providers. Connectivity with cloud solutions isn't easy compared to other frameworks like Django and Python.""The most valuable features of Spring Boot include being able to check all the logs and doing health checks for applications. We can also do monitoring more quickly, and use Spring Boot for production support, so when production goes up or down, we can bring up the application very quickly through Spring Boot.""The cloud version is very scalable."

More Spring Boot Pros →

Cons
"The library could be updated.""I would like to see compatible versions, and what new features they will be providing. If it is a useful feature I can merge it. If it is not a usable feature, then I can ignore the newer version.""Some of the libraries that we try to use in npm have issues with security. Also, because it's an open-source solution, I think there are lots of challenges with security. So, the security layer could be improved.""NPM can improve the package manager. For the packages we download for our APM studio to trigger our APM driver, it would benefit if we could have the latest version of NuGet Package Manager within the package manager control. For example, Visual Studio would be good. Then it would be easy for us to get the package manager from there instead of Googling it out and matching it with the current version. It would be less time-consuming for us.""The product should be compatible with various programming languages, including both native and upcoming languages."

More npm Cons →

"Spring Boot could improve the interface, error handling, and integration performance.""The solution has some vulnerabilities and fails our security audits, forcing us to keep fixing the solution.""We'd like them to develop more supporting testing.""The database connectivity could be better in terms of dealing with multi-tenant systems.""Spring Boot is okay right now, but my team is looking for some integration where you can make a call to the JMS messaging service and other types of third-party integrations. If the integration with Spring Boot is improved, that would make the tool better. What I'd like to see in the next release of Spring Boot is its integration or tie-up with messaging servers and third-party EFPs, as that would make it very good and more competitive versus other new solutions in the market.""It needs more applicable control for large-scale application development.""Building a new product in Spring Boot can take a long time since the solution uses reflection. This is one area the solution could be improved.""The cross framework compatibility has some shortcomings. With JUnit Test Runner and Spring Boot, it's really tedious to make them both work to write the test cases."

More Spring Boot Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "NPM is an open-source solution."
  • "The licensing cost is around one hundred and fifty dollars on a quarterly basis."
  • "We use the open-source version, so it is free."
  • "It's an open-source solution, and there are no hidden fees."
  • More npm Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Spring Boot is free; even the Spring Tools Suite for Eclipse is free."
  • "This is an open-source product."
  • "It's open-source software, so it's free. It's a community license."
  • "This solution is free unless you apply for support."
  • "As Spring Boot is an open-source tool, it's free."
  • "Spring Boot is an open source solution, it is free to use."
  • "If you want support there is paid enterprise version with support available."
  • "This is an open source solution."
  • More Spring Boot Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's most valuable feature is dependency installation.
    Top Answer:We use the open-source version, so it is free.
    Top Answer:The product should be compatible with various programming languages, including both native and upcoming languages. There should be an extension for C++ language as many customers prefer it for the… more »
    Top Answer:1. Open Source 2. Excellent Community Support -- Widely used across different projects -- so your search for answers would be easy and almost certain. 3. Extendable Stack with a wide array of… more »
    Top Answer:Springboot is a Java-based solution that is very popular and easy to use. You can use it to build applications quickly and confidently. Springboot has a very large, helpful learning community, which… more »
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Spring Boot or Jakarta EE application creation software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Spring Boot. Spring Boot offers… more »
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 12 in Java Frameworks
    Views
    174
    Comparisons
    41
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    290
    Rating
    8.8
    1st
    out of 12 in Java Frameworks
    Views
    28,805
    Comparisons
    18,749
    Reviews
    29
    Average Words per Review
    414
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Jakarta EE logo
    Compared 47% of the time.
    Apache Spark logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Open Liberty logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Eclipse MicroProfile logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Vert.x logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    npm is the package manager for the Node JavaScript platform. It puts modules in place so that node can find them, and manages dependency conflicts intelligently. It is extremely configurable to support a wide variety of use cases. Most commonly, it is used to publish, discover, install, and develop node programs.

    Spring Boot is a tool that makes developing web applications and microservices with the Java Spring Framework faster and easier, with minimal configuration and setup. By using Spring Boot, you avoid all the manual writing of boilerplate code, annotations, and complex XML configurations. Spring Boot integrates easily with other Spring products and can connect with multiple databases.

    How Spring Boot improves Spring Framework

    Java Spring Framework is a popular, open-source framework for creating standalone applications that run on the Java Virtual Machine.

    Although the Spring Framework is powerful, it still takes significant time and knowledge to configure, set up, and deploy Spring applications. Spring Boot is designed to get developers up and running as quickly as possible, with minimal configuration of Spring Framework with three important capabilities.

    • Autoconfiguration: Spring Boot applications are initialized with pre-set dependencies and don't have to be configured manually. Spring Boot also automatically configures both the underlying Spring Framework and any third-party packages based on your settings and on best practices, preventing future errors. Spring Boot's autoconfiguration feature enables you to start developing Spring applications quickly and efficiently. With Spring Boot, you reduce development time and increase the overall efficiency of the development process.

    • Opinionated approach: Spring Boot uses its own judgment for adding and configuring starter packages for your application, depending on the requirements of your project. (These are defined by filling out a simple web-form during the initialization process.) Spring Boot chooses which dependencies to install and which default values to use according to the form’s values.

    • Standalone applications: Spring Boot allows developers to create applications that can run on their own without relying on an external web server, by embedding a web server inside the application. Spring Boot applications can be launched on any platform simply by hitting the Run command.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Spring Boot stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its flexible integration options and its autoconfiguration feature, which allows users to start developing applications in a minimal amount of time.

    A system analyst and team lead at a tech services company writes, “Spring Boot has a very lightweight framework, and you can develop projects within a short time. It's open-source and customizable. It's easy to control, has a very interesting deployment policy, and a very interesting testing policy. It's sophisticated. For data analysis and data mining, you can use a custom API and integrate your application. That's an advanced feature. For data managing and other things, you can get that custom from a third-party API. That is also a free license.”

    Randy M., A CEO at Modal Technologies Corporation, writes, “I have found the starter solutions valuable, as well as integration with other products. Spring Security facilitates the handling of standard security measures. The Spring Boot annotations make it easy to handle routing for microservices and to access request and response objects. Other annotations included with Spring Boot enable move away from XML configuration.”

    Sample Customers
    slack, microsoft, netflix, adobe, docker, visa, splunk, zillow
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm42%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Security Firm5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Spring Boot vs. npm
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Spring Boot vs. npm and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    npm is ranked 5th in Java Frameworks with 5 reviews while Spring Boot is ranked 1st in Java Frameworks with 38 reviews. npm is rated 8.8, while Spring Boot is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of npm writes "User friendly, easy work flow, with fast deployment after compatibility check". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spring Boot writes "It's highly scalable, secure, and provides all the enhanced tools I need. ". npm is most compared with Amazon Corretto, whereas Spring Boot is most compared with Jakarta EE, Apache Spark, Open Liberty, Eclipse MicroProfile and Vert.x. See our Spring Boot vs. npm report.

    See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.

    We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.