We performed a comparison between Jakarta EE and npm based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Java Frameworks solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The feature that allows a variation of work space based on the application being used."
"Configuring, monitoring, and ensuring observability is a straightforward process."
"Jakarta EE's best features include REST services, configuration, and persistent facilities. It's also incredibly cloud friendly."
"The solution is scalable."
"The reversal build, gendered build, migrated PCA, and CT features are excellent."
"The product's most valuable feature is dependency installation."
"It's an open-source setting that's very scalable and easily approachable. I like that you can plug in many features to my product."
"The most valuable feature of NPM is to trigger APMs."
"All the customization and plugins can make the interface too slow and heavy in some situations."
"Jakarta EE's configuration could be simpler, which would make it more useful as a developer experience."
"It would be great if we could have a UI-based approach or easily include the specific dependencies we need."
"NPM can improve the package manager. For the packages we download for our APM studio to trigger our APM driver, it would benefit if we could have the latest version of NuGet Package Manager within the package manager control. For example, Visual Studio would be good. Then it would be easy for us to get the package manager from there instead of Googling it out and matching it with the current version. It would be less time-consuming for us."
"The library could be updated."
"Some of the libraries that we try to use in npm have issues with security. Also, because it's an open-source solution, I think there are lots of challenges with security. So, the security layer could be improved."
"The product should be compatible with various programming languages, including both native and upcoming languages."
"I would like to see compatible versions, and what new features they will be providing. If it is a useful feature I can merge it. If it is not a usable feature, then I can ignore the newer version."
Jakarta EE is ranked 4th in Java Frameworks with 3 reviews while npm is ranked 5th in Java Frameworks with 5 reviews. Jakarta EE is rated 7.4, while npm is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Jakarta EE writes "A robust enterprise Java capabilities with complex configuration involved, making it a powerful choice for scalable applications while requiring a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of npm writes "User friendly, easy work flow, with fast deployment after compatibility check". Jakarta EE is most compared with Spring Boot, Spring MVC, Amazon Corretto, Eclipse MicroProfile and Vert.x, whereas npm is most compared with Amazon Corretto. See our Jakarta EE vs. npm report.
See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.
We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
