We performed a comparison between Neo4j Graph Database and ScyllaDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."Creates the ability to visualize outputs."
"Enables people to understand what the business problem is and how the technology helps."
"As a graph database, I am surprised at their performance and response time."
"The performance aspects of Scylla are good, as always... A good point about Scylla is that it can be used extensively."
"It is lightweight, and it requires less infrastructure."
"So far, we have not had any issues and are happy with the product in general."
"There are concerns about performance and whether the tool can necessarily scale to provide the solution."
"Data export, along with how we can purchase the data periodically, needs to be improved so that the storage is within control. Then, we could optimize it even better."
"The documentation of Scylla is an area with shortcomings and needs to be improved."
Neo4j Graph Database is ranked 7th in NoSQL Databases with 3 reviews while ScyllaDB is ranked 6th in NoSQL Databases with 2 reviews. Neo4j Graph Database is rated 8.4, while ScyllaDB is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Neo4j Graph Database writes "Lots of training and documentation and excellent performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScyllaDB writes "A solution that offers good performance and flexibility to its users". Neo4j Graph Database is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, Accumulo, SingleStore and InfluxDB, whereas ScyllaDB is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, Couchbase, Apache HBase and DataStax.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
