Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ScyllaDB based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Redis, MongoDB Enterprise Advanced, and InfluxDB.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
ScyllaDB Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with ScyllaDB, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
ScyllaDB excels in cost-efficiency and high throughput, appealing to those handling large datasets. In comparison, Redis offers advanced capabilities, like rich data structures and in-memory processing, making it ideal for applications needing fast data access and a comprehensive feature set.
ScyllaDB offers a lower setup cost compared to Redis, allowing for a more budget-friendly initial deployment, while Redis presents a higher setup cost, reflecting its investment in more comprehensive initial support and configuration options.
ScyllaDB offers a lower setup cost compared to Redis, allowing for a more budget-friendly initial deployment, while Redis presents a higher setup cost, reflecting its investment in more comprehensive initial support and configuration options.
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced excels in scalability and flexibility for diverse data storage, benefiting applications with document storage needs. In comparison, ScyllaDB offers high-speed performance and strong consistency, suiting large-scale distributed environments. MongoDB's deployment options and community support contrast with ScyllaDB's robust enterprise services.
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced has a higher setup cost, focusing on extensive enterprise features, while ScyllaDB offers a lower setup cost, appealing to businesses seeking cost-effective solutions.
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced has a higher setup cost, focusing on extensive enterprise features, while ScyllaDB offers a lower setup cost, appealing to businesses seeking cost-effective solutions.
InfluxDB handles time-series data efficiently with low setup costs and user-friendly deployment. In comparison, ScyllaDB excels in scalability and performance for high-throughput applications, offering flexible deployment and comprehensive service options, despite its higher price, making it ideal for data-intensive environments requiring robust performance.
InfluxDB has upfront setup costs that are generally higher, whereas ScyllaDB offers a more cost-effective initial setup option, highlighting a significant difference in pricing structure between the two databases.
InfluxDB has upfront setup costs that are generally higher, whereas ScyllaDB offers a more cost-effective initial setup option, highlighting a significant difference in pricing structure between the two databases.
Cassandra is valued for its expansive community support and cost-effectiveness, ideal for organizations focused on scalability. In comparison, ScyllaDB offers high throughput and low latency, attracting tech buyers with its modern architecture and potential for efficient resource utilization and reduced ongoing costs.
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop provides comprehensive features with strong cluster management and enterprise security, ideal for large-scale environments. In comparison, ScyllaDB offers high-speed data handling and resource efficiency, appealing to those prioritizing performance and cost-effectiveness in data management solutions.
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop offers a more flexible setup cost, while ScyllaDB presents a simpler pricing model. The differences highlight Cloudera's scalable approach versus ScyllaDB's straightforward implementation.
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop offers a more flexible setup cost, while ScyllaDB presents a simpler pricing model. The differences highlight Cloudera's scalable approach versus ScyllaDB's straightforward implementation.
Couchbase Enterprise excels with horizontal scaling and integration flexibility, ideal for document tasks. In comparison, ScyllaDB offers performance and efficiency, suitable for handling high volumes. Tech buyers might choose Couchbase for versatility or ScyllaDB for speed and optimized I/O operations.
Couchbase Enterprise setup costs present a more intricate pricing model, frequently reported as higher, while ScyllaDB offers a straightforward, often lower setup fee. Users highlight the significant difference in initial expenses between the two solutions.
Couchbase Enterprise setup costs present a more intricate pricing model, frequently reported as higher, while ScyllaDB offers a straightforward, often lower setup fee. Users highlight the significant difference in initial expenses between the two solutions.
Apache HBase excels in scalability and its integration with Hadoop, making it ideal for growing data needs. In comparison, ScyllaDB focuses on low-latency performance with high throughput, offering significant ROI through efficient resource use and rapid data retrieval capabilities.
Neo4j specializes in graph-based models for complex relationship handling and social networks. In comparison, ScyllaDB offers high-speed NoSQL capabilities and massive scalability ideal for large-scale applications, suiting enterprises needing fast data retrieval and efficient customer service.
Neo4j Graph Database generally has a higher setup cost compared to ScyllaDB, which is often considered more budget-friendly for initial implementation.
Neo4j Graph Database generally has a higher setup cost compared to ScyllaDB, which is often considered more budget-friendly for initial implementation.
Aerospike is an enterprise-class, NoSQL database solution for real-time operational applications that delivers predictable performance at scale, superior uptime, and high availability at the lowest Total Cost of Ownership compared to first-generation NoSQL and relational databases.
Oracle NoSQL provides integration with Oracle's ecosystem and strong security, appealing to those prioritizing secure transactions. In comparison, ScyllaDB attracts buyers seeking high performance and low-latency, ideal for rapidly scaling data processing environments where speed is crucial.
Apache CouchDB is open source database software that focuses on ease of use and having a scalable architecture. It has a document-oriented NoSQL database architecture and is implemented in the concurrency-oriented language Erlang; it uses JSON to store data, JavaScript as its query language using MapReduce, and HTTP for an API.
DataStax Enterprise shines with robust features like built-in search, making it ideal for complex workloads. In comparison, ScyllaDB's shard-per-core architecture offers impressive speed and efficiency, appealing to those prioritizing high performance with lower costs. DataStax's extensive support contrasts with ScyllaDB's simpler deployment.
