No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Nanonets vs Readabl.ai comparison

Why PeerSpot?
Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Automation Anywhere
Sponsored
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
662
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (2nd), Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (2nd), Process Mining (1st), Agentic Automation (1st), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (2nd), AI Legal & Compliance (1st), AI Finance & Accounting (2nd), AI Procurement & Supply Chain (1st)
Nanonets
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
12th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Readabl.ai
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
34th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) category, the mindshare of Automation Anywhere is 3.4%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nanonets is 1.6%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Readabl.ai is 1.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Automation Anywhere3.4%
Nanonets1.6%
Readabl.ai1.0%
Other94.0%
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
 

Featured Reviews

Venkat Sivaprakash - PeerSpot reviewer
Management Consultant at Accenture
Has significantly improved document-driven workflows and reduced processing time across finance and HR functions
Automation Anywhere has evolved significantly and upgraded itself to provide agentic AI and AI-based automation solutions for document automation. The product has matured considerably over time. We can create workflows that can call an API. We can include prompts in particular workflows for ChatGPT-related functions, connecting to an LLM and RAG to perform tasks. For document automation, modern features are available to train documents, ensuring high accuracy and repeatability over time. The system is very easy to use. I recently completed a course in document automation, typically designed for people involved in coding and technical aspects. Though I understand coding comprehensively, I don't do actual coding. The course was very accessible. Currently, extensive coding isn't necessary due to the hybrid model incorporating GenAI aspects, low-code, no-code capabilities, APIs, and numerous pre-built objects in Automation Anywhere. The features include GenAI-driven prompting methods and workflow creation capabilities. In these workflows, we can create decision boxes and call APIs without coding. We simply pull objects, drop them, connect them, and add minimal coding when needed. The most crucial aspect isn't coding but rather sizing the automation and fleshing out the details. Automation Co-pilot takes notes and performs automated analysis. It can extract details from videos, summarize conversations, and provide detailed information. During calls, it identifies instructions and performs tasks such as preparing reports and reconciliation. Automation Anywhere can also connect with Microsoft Co-pilot. Through Co-pilot, real-time operations can be executed, allowing direct interaction between vendors and automation through this component.
reviewer2855805 - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Automated invoice conciliation has reduced manual checks and now delivers accurate OCR data
The best features Nanonets offers are OCR and integrations. These features have reduced manual efforts significantly. Currently, manual checking of data between the database and invoices is no longer necessary, as AI is now performing that work. Nanonets is an AI OCR model that I trained to deliver purposeful output. As an AI model, I can briefly describe and extract data from documents. Nanonets is primarily focused on documents, allowing me to extract data, compare it, and it is also useful for handwritten documents. It delivers output that is 99% accurate for handwritten documents as well. I consider Nanonets a good tool that I have worked with, and I have worked on its integration using Python.
it_user1657563 - PeerSpot reviewer
Test Consultant
Stable and scalable with multiple services available simultaneously
There are some features that are provided in the paid version only. They are not a part of the free version. It would be good if some of them could be added to the free version as well to increase usability. If they did that, more people would go for the free version and it will help them explore all kinds of paid services and paid features at no cost. Likely, this would drive adoption and help them acquire more users. It would be ideal if they could add support for rare services as well, to make it so that you can get a response both for SOAP and REST services.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Object cloning with an option to enter wildcard selection was very useful when working in a web application that generated dynamic HTML content."
"If we count the integrations that we have done with Appian, which is where a lot of our savings is from, we are well over a million dollars in savings."
"AA has good coverage in terms of out-of-the-box functionality for bot development and management."
"I implemented AA in different environments, the AA installation is the smoothest compared to other RPA software installs."
"It's a perfect product; it's made my life very easy and a lot of people's lives very easy, removing hectic, repetitive, boring work and giving people free time to do the work they really want to do."
"Adding Automation Anywhere is a tremendous value-add in the long-term."
"With automation, you can reduce that effort to half an hour or an hour, so it will improve your efficiency and save you a lot of time, so you can improve your time in other work."
"Automation Anywhere is a decent competitor and gives a better solution."
"The accuracy percentage of Nanonets was around 92-93%, which has had a high impact because it has reduced approximately 9.2 FTEs in manual efforts."
"Nanonets has positively impacted my organization by providing a solution that works for us as developers."
"The best features Nanonets offers include their workflow and OCR detection capabilities, which have positively impacted my organization by helping detect edge cases in OCR that require some post-processing or pre-processing and have improved efficiency and reduced errors."
"Within the cloud solution, there are multiple services that can be deployed on a particular cloud and you can interact with those servers at the same time."
"It's like a parallel application, where you can hit multiple services at the same time and you can get a response, and that's a big advantage here as it's a time-saving and cost-saving method."
 

Cons

"It is very difficult to create and automate timetables because they are modal, and it would be helpful if the bot could assist us with this."
"Also, the Master certification should be provided free of cost for partners. More practical samples and examples of bots using new features in A2019 should be available in people Documentation. A2019 presentation material for proposing A2019 as an RPA choice should be provided to partners."
"20 percent of the bots need to supervised because sometimes errors occur during the run. Most of the errors that I have encountered have been because the object cloning did not capture the buttons properly."
"I would like to see more bots available right out-of-the-box in the SAP area. For example, if you take the overall OTC in our organization, we have to contact 15 teams. Even if we provide one big bot for the OTC, it won't work. It will not be used by one person. So if there could be more specific bots out-of-the-box, that would be really helpful."
"This solution could be more stable because sometimes I see some bugs."
"I haven't gone deep in the tool, but so far it looks good."
"There is an issue with security where users can see the values in the credential vault."
"Currently, there are some vulnerabilities in security that need attention in Automation Anywhere."
"I think Nanonets can be improved as the pricing seems to be a bit high, which is one of the things they should improve."
"I have observed that while training Nanonets, we must provide a larger number of examples or documents."
"Nanonets can be improved with a larger number of samples and test scenarios."
"We do not see an ROI at this time."
"It would be ideal if they could add support for rare services as well, to make it so that you can get a response both for SOAP and REST services."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is a little bit high but the support is good."
"It costs up to $1,200 per license."
"AA comes at a more affordable price than the other tools."
"I would rate the price of Automation Anywhere a six out of ten, with ten being the most expensive."
"Pricing is affordable and I would recommend beginning with the Starter Package."
"It has good licensing costs which are average for the market."
"The solution itself is free unless we want to add the support option but we have to pay for the bots we use."
"My understanding is that the license cost of Automation Anywhere is more reasonable than UiPath and Blue Prism."
Information not available
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions are best for your needs.
913,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business161
Midsize Enterprise82
Large Enterprise558
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?
It depends on your use case. Is it simply to automate a couple of processes? Is it to augment a human team? AA is ver...
How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?
From my experience using AA tool, it depends on the applications that you want to automate, because there some applic...
How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?
It is a highly preferred RPA tool. You can check my Automation Anywhere Review to know more.
What needs improvement with Nanonets?
Nanonets can be improved with a larger number of samples and test scenarios. I would suggest training Nanonets simila...
What is your primary use case for Nanonets?
I use Nanonets for OCR purposes, specifically for invoice conciliation. For invoice conciliation, I used Nanonets to ...
What advice do you have for others considering Nanonets?
Nanonets's AI capabilities are secure. Regarding Nanonets's accuracy and reliability of output, in my use case it was...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Automation Anywhere, Testing Anywhere, Automation Anywhere Enterprise, Agentic Process Automation System (Now Certified for WorkSpaces)
No data available
No data available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Google, Linkedin, Cisco, Juniper Networks, DellEMC, Comcast, Mastercard, Quest Diagnostics
Information Not Available
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Automation Anywhere, UiPath, ABBYY and others in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP). Updated: August 2026.
913,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.