Morphisec vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection comparison

Morphisec and Veritas are both solutions in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category. Morphisec is ranked #35, while Veritas is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.0. Morphisec holds a 1.0% mindshare in ATP, compared to Veritas’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Morphisec users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Veritas users who would recommend it.

Morphisec

Read 21 Morphisec reviews

146 Views
22 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Read 14 Veritas Alta SaaS Protection reviews

50 Views
27 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Morphisec

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection and Morphisec compete in the IT security arena. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection tends to have the upper hand in data management capabilities and support, while Morphisec distinguishes itself with advanced threat prevention features.

Features: Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is known for comprehensive data protection, easy integration, and robust compliance tools. Morphisec offers innovative endpoint protection, a lightweight design, and powerful threat prevention mechanisms.

Room for Improvement: Veritas Alta SaaS Protection could enhance compatibility with more cloud environments and refine minor bug issues. It might also benefit from broader feature accessibility without needing high-level manufacturer relationships. Morphisec could improve its customer service, offer better integrations with non-Microsoft environments, and address the complexity in its zero-day threat detection setup.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Veritas Alta SaaS Protection features seamless deployment with extensive documentation and support. Morphisec's deployment simplicity and minimal resource usage are strengths, though its customer service is less acclaimed than Veritas.

Pricing and ROI: Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is competitive with reasonable setup costs and a focus on delivering good ROI through robust data protection. Morphisec demands a higher initial investment, justified by its superior threat prevention features in security-heavy settings.

To learn more, read our detailed Morphisec vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Morphisec vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Morphisec

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

35th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (65th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (55th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (62nd), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (33rd), Threat Deception Platforms (16th)

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SaaS Backup (13th), SaaS Management Platforms (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Morphisec is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

Rick Schibler

VP of Information Technology at Kentucky Trailer

Offers in-memory protection at a lower price than competitors

Morphisec's in-memory protection is probably the most valuable feature because it stops malicious activity from occurring. If something tries to install or act as a sleeper agent, Morphisec will detect and stop it. Morphisec's Moving Target Defense is critical to hardening our attack surface. If it detects something, it indicates whether it's valid. That means you've got a breach requiring investigation. It detects anomalies but doesn't necessarily point to what caused them. You still need to do that work. The solution is reasonably easy to administer. They made some changes last year, adding a cloud-based monitoring solution that makes deploying and monitoring our endpoints easy.

Read full review

Daniel Ogola

Cloud Architect at Technology Associates Limited

The appliance is ready to integrate with the cloud in cases where the customers have a hybrid or cloud environment.

The go-between is a Veritas partner, so the customer support was not that good. The solution is fine except when there is a purchasing crisis where you have to remake the ecosystem. It causes a lot of issues. The support was a problem, but we're okay with it as long as we have someone to communicate with.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Morphisec's in-memory protection is probably the most valuable feature because it stops malicious activity from occurring. If something tries to install or act as a sleeper agent, Morphisec will detect and stop it."

"All the alerts are on the dashboard, which is quite simple and useful for us. You can easily check all the alerts that are being blocked or allowed, or whatever the action is. You can easily see that and you can take the necessary actions. You can add a PowerShell extension or any activities for blocking at your network level or for endpoints."

"Morphisec stops attacks without needing to know what type of threat it is, just that it is foreign. It is based on injections, so it would know when a software launches. If a software launches and something else also launches, then it would count that as anomalous and block it. Because the software looks at the code, and if it executes something else that is not related, then Morphisec would block it. That is how it works."

"It also provides full visibility into security events from Microsoft Defender and Morphisec in one dashboard. We've always had that capability with Morphisec. The more recent version appears to do that even a little bit more natively and it's given us visibility that we didn't have otherwise."

"The biggest feature is that it hides everything from your operating system that's running in-memory from anything to try to run against it. That's the most unique thing that's on the market. There's nothing else out there that's quite like that. That's a big selling point and why we went with it. It does exactly what the design does. If you can't find it, you can't execute against it."

"Morphisec has absolutely helped save money on our security stack. The ransomware at the end of the day can cost organizations millions upon millions of dollars. Investing in tools like Morphisec is a great reduction in that cost. If I can spend $10,000 in a year to protect assets that could be ransomed for $20,000,000, that's definitely a bet that one should pursue. Morphisec absolutely it's worth the investment."

"Morphisec makes use of deterministic attack prevention that doesn’t require investigation of security alerts. It changes the memory locations of where certain applications run. If you think of Excel, opening a PDF, running an Excel macro, or opening a webpage and clicking on a link, all of those actions run in a certain area of memory. Morphisec changes the memory locations of where those run."

"What's valuable is really the whole kit and caboodle of the Morphisec agent. What it does is genius, in a way, until the bad guys get wise to it. You set it up and then you watch the dashboard. There isn't really much tinkering."

More Morphisec pros

"What I like most about Veritas SaaS Backup is that it is easy to work on."

"It's a good solution. It's pretty stable."

"The most valuable features are the ease of administration and the ease of configuration."

"The duplication is the solution's most valuable feature."

"The solution is stable; I haven't experienced any bugs or glitches on it."

"It's very comprehensive. It's one of the first brands to appear in its field."

"The most valuable feature is that it is simple to use."

"I think the most important feature is the ability of SaaS Backup to cover all modules proposed by Office 365, because competing solutions don't cover the total scope."

More Veritas Alta SaaS Protection pros

Cons

"Those are some of the features that I was looking for on my on-prem platform that they've already instituted in the cloud and that I'm sure will be instituting on their on-prem platform as well. Having to have an on-prem server required a lot of administration. Being able to push that to the cloud and have it managed up there for us is a real nice addition."

"It would be useful for them if they had some kind of network discovery. That kind of functionality I think would give IT administrators a little bit more confidence that they have 100 percent coverage, and it gives them something to audit against. Network discovery would be one area I would definitely suggest that they put some effort into."

"It might be a bit much to ask, but we are now beginning to use Morphisec Scout, which provides vulnerability information. At this time, it's recognizing vulnerabilities and reporting them to us, but it's not necessarily resolving them. There's still a separate manual process to resolve those vulnerabilities, primarily through upgrades. We have to do that outside of Morphisec. If Morphisec could somehow have that capability built into it, that would be very effective."

"Some of the filters for the console need improvement. There are alerts that show up and just being able to acknowledge that we've seen those and not turn them off, but dismiss them, would be a huge benefit."

"We started in the Linux platform and we deployed to Linux. The licensing of that has been kind of confusing between Linux licensing and Windows licensing. The overall simplicity of licensing or offering an enterprise license to just cover everything and then we don't have to count needs improvement."

"From a company standpoint, a little more interaction with the customers throughout the year might be beneficial. I would like check-ins from the Morphisec account executives about any type of Morphisec news as well as a bit more interaction with customers throughout the year to know if anything new is coming out with Morphisec, e.g., what they are working on in regards to their development roadmap. We tend not to get that up until the time that we go for a yearly renewal. So, we end up talking to people from Morphisec once a year, but it is usually at renewal time."

"The dashboard is the area that requires the most improvement. We have about, I would say 5,500 computers currently, and searching through all of those takes some time to filter. So as soon as you apply the filter, it takes a few seconds. It crunches, it thinks, and then it brings up the clients that match."

"The weakest point of this product is how difficult it is to understand the reasons for an alert. This is a problem because it is hard to determine whether an attack is real or not."

More Morphisec cons

"The go-between is a Veritas partner, so the customer support was not that good. The solution is fine except when there is a purchasing crisis where you have to remake the ecosystem. It causes a lot of issues. The support was a problem, but we're okay with it as long as we have someone to communicate with."

"An area for improvement is the product's performance, especially how long it takes to do a job."

"The tool can be improved in terms of maintainability and flexibility, especially as companies grow larger. In these aspects, I feel Veeam is better for cloud and operational purposes."

"Technical support can be improved."

"Currently, it isn't possible to use anything other than Veritas cloud to back up to. I think today it's important to cover the three major cloud provider: GCP, Azure and AWS."

"The implementation could be improved. The server setup is very easy, but some specific client implementation, for example, Oracle or SQL servers, are a little bit complicated. they should offer a bit more assistance with the setup for these particular items."

"Licensing has been a struggle. It went from bronze, silver to gold. Licensing needs more sophistication. It has features that are sold as separate add-ons."

"When you finish a project, the client should have the opportunity to browse the files rather than simply ending the contract. Also, it's not possible to recover earlier versions. It should be possible to have a database for recovering files after you finish a contract. There's no solution for this from Veritas."

More Veritas Alta SaaS Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is definitely fair for what it does."

"It is priced correctly for what it does. They end up doing a good deal of discounting, but I think it is priced appropriately."

"Compared to their competitors, the price of Morphisec is not that high. You can easily deploy it on a large-scale or small-scale network."

"It does not have multi-tenants. If South Africa wants to show only the machines that they have, they need their own cloud incidence. It is not possible to have that in a single cloud incidence with multiple tenants in it, instead you need to have multiple cloud incidences. Then, if you have that, it will be more expensive. However, they are going to change that, which is good."

"It is a little bit more expensive than other security products that we use, but it does provide us good protection. So, it is a trade-off."

"Morphisec is reasonably priced because our parent company's other subsidiaries use different products like CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike is four or five times more expensive than Morphisec. The competitive pricing saves us money in our overall security stack."

"Price-wise, it's on the higher side. A traditional antivirus solution is cheaper, but in terms of security and manageability, its ROI is better than a traditional antivirus. I would recommend it to anybody evaluating or considering an antivirus solution. If your system gets compromised, the cost of ransom would be a lot more. This way, it saves a lot of cost."

"We are still using a separate tool. I know for our 600 or I think we're actually licensed for up to 700 users, it runs me 23 or $24,000 a year. When you're talking to that many users plus servers being protected, that's well worth the investment for that dollar amount."

More Morphisec pricing and cost advice

"The tool is expensive compared to Veeam."

"The program is quite expensive."

"I would rate this solution's pricing as five out of five."

"This solution is not cheap and not expensive but priced in the mid-range."

"SaaS Backup isn't the most expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veritas Alto SaaS Protection?

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is slightly expensive, but they can do more on it. The exact figure for Veritas Alta SaaS Protection depends on the size of data being stored, the region, and the type ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Veritas Alto SaaS Protection?

For Veritas Alta SaaS Protection, the only challenge is downtime and the impact of time synchronization whereby different customers are on different time zones, and Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Veritas Alto SaaS Protection?

For the customers that I'm dealing with, they are using Veritas Alta SaaS Protection for long-term retention and offline backups. This means they don't have to constrain their on-premise resources....

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Morphisec

Compared 30% of the time

Halcyon vs Morphisec

Compared 15% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Morphisec

Compared 12% of the time

Hyver vs Morphisec

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs Morphisec

Compared 6% of the time

More Morphisec Competitors

Veritas NetBackup vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Compared 25% of the time

Cohesity DataProtect vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Compared 18% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Compared 17% of the time

Keepit vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Compared 11% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Compared 10% of the time

More Veritas Alta SaaS Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Morphisec

June 2025

Download Morphisec product report

Buyer's Guide

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

May 2025

Download Veritas Alta SaaS Protection product report

Also Known As

Morphisec, Morphisec Moving Target Defense

SaaS Backup

Overview

Morphisec integrates seamlessly with platforms like Microsoft Defender, offering signatureless protection against zero-day threats and ransomware. It enhances existing endpoint solutions with minimal maintenance through its set-and-forget deployment, providing heightened security and reduced false positives.

Morphisec strengthens defense strategies by merging memory morphing and signatureless protection to effectively block zero-day attacks and ransomware. It operates efficiently within existing infrastructure, reducing system impact and maintenance needs. Users find its full visibility dashboard invaluable. Despite its strengths, cloud deployment and reporting features can be improved. Stability, alerts, and integration with other systems pose challenges for users, impacting usability and support quality.

What are Morphisec's key features?

Seamless Integration: Works with Microsoft Defender for comprehensive dashboard visibility
Memory Morphing: Hides processes to reduce attack surfaces
Signatureless Protection: Prevents threats without impacting performance
Automatic Threat Blocking: Uses inbuilt intelligence to detect risks
Set-and-Forget Deployment: Simplifies management and reduces maintenance

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Quick Deployment: Fast setup without disrupting operations
Enhanced Protection: Provides an additional defense layer against advanced threats
Cost-Effectiveness: Works with existing licenses, minimizing extra investments
Improved Compatibility: Integrates smoothly with current antivirus systems
Minimal System Impact: Operates efficiently without overloading resources

In security-focused industries, Morphisec is crucial for protecting workstations and servers against sophisticated attacks like ransomware. Its signatureless technology offers early threat detection, while compatibility with existing systems ensures seamless integration, providing advanced protection without additional licensing costs.

Morphisec

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is a comprehensive cloud-to-cloud backup and recovery solution designed to protect critical data and applications in Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) environments. With the increasing adoption of SaaS applications like Microsoft Office 365 and Salesforce, organizations need a reliable and efficient way to safeguard their data from accidental deletion, malicious attacks, and other data loss scenarios.

This product overview will highlight the key features and benefits of Veritas Alta SaaS Protection. Firstly, it offers automated and continuous backup of SaaS data, ensuring that organizations can easily recover lost or corrupted data with minimal downtime. The solution supports a wide range of SaaS applications, including email, calendars, contacts, files, and collaboration platforms.

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection provides granular recovery options, allowing users to restore individual items, folders, or entire applications as needed. This flexibility ensures that organizations can quickly recover specific data without the need for a full system restore. Additionally, the solution offers point-in-time recovery, enabling users to restore data from a specific date and time, further enhancing data protection and compliance requirements.

Another key feature of Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is its advanced security capabilities. The solution encrypts data both in transit and at rest, ensuring that sensitive information remains secure throughout the backup and recovery process. It also provides multi-factor authentication and role-based access controls, allowing organizations to enforce strict access policies and prevent unauthorized access to their SaaS data.

Furthermore, Veritas Alta SaaS Protection offers a user-friendly interface and intuitive management console, making it easy for organizations to configure and monitor their backup and recovery processes. The solution provides comprehensive reporting and auditing capabilities, allowing administrators to track backup status, monitor storage usage, and generate compliance reports.

Veritas

Sample Customers

Lenovo/Motorola, TruGreen, Covenant Health, Citizens Medical Center

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Morphisec vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

June 2025

Free Report: Morphisec vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Morphisec vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Morphisec vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection report.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.