We performed a comparison between Mirantis Container Cloud and SUSE NeuVector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is scalable and we have plans to increase usage in the future."
"Main products are portable."
"I think the volume binding is a really interesting feature."
"It is a stable solution. It is nearly perfect. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable aspect is the excellent support. In addition, the billing system is really easy to understand."
"The most valuable feature is its ease of use."
"The product's initial setup phase is simple."
"The solution containerizes software."
"The UI has a lot of features."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."
"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."
"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."
"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."
"When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."
"The solution's stability could be improved."
"It will be better if the product provides dynamic load-balancing capabilities."
"More integrations with other platforms would be beneficial."
"With the Mirantis runtime being removed from Kubernetes, which is the industry-wide standard for orchestration of containers, I think it's going in a direction that is not super scalable."
"When it comes to the integration part, it's the basic functionality, but for any product, at the end of the day, security is extremely relevant. I personally feel like you have to constantly strive towards being more secure. You can never be 100% secure, and you have to work more toward security. It's as simple as that."
"There are a couple of things. Firstly, the vaultStore database within Container isn't as efficient as a standalone Container vault. This needs improvement."
"The solution would benefit in improvements made to the storage, cleaning up information from the disk, and reading logs."
"Integration with Windows is something that can be improved."
"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."
"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."
"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."
"The documentation needs to improve a bit."
"SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful."
"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."
"The image-scanning features need improvement."
Mirantis Container Cloud is ranked 14th in Container Security with 29 reviews while SUSE NeuVector is ranked 19th in Container Security with 7 reviews. Mirantis Container Cloud is rated 8.8, while SUSE NeuVector is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Mirantis Container Cloud writes "An easy-to-manage solution that helps to manage web pages ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SUSE NeuVector writes "Good value for money; great for policy management". Mirantis Container Cloud is most compared with SUSE Rancher, whereas SUSE NeuVector is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Sysdig Falco, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Aqua Cloud Security Platform and Sysdig Secure. See our Mirantis Container Cloud vs. SUSE NeuVector report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.