Numecent Cloudpager vs Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) comparison

Numecent and Parallels are both solutions in the Application Virtualization category. Numecent is ranked #5, while Parallels is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. Numecent holds a 13.3% mindshare in AV, compared to Parallels’s 16.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Numecent users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Parallels users who would recommend it.

Numecent Cloudpager

Read 1 Numecent Cloudpager review

744 Views
352 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Parallels Remote Applicatio...

Read 25 Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) reviews

646 Views
433 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Numecent Cloudpager

Parallels Remote Applicatio...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 31, 2025

Parallels Remote Application Server RAS and Numecent Cloudpager compete in the application virtualization field, offering virtual desktop infrastructure solutions. Parallels RAS has the advantage with its competitive pricing and strong support, while Numecent Cloudpager attracts those seeking advanced features and flexibility.

Features: Parallels RAS offers reliable application delivery, enhanced security, and seamless integration, focusing on affordability and easy management. Numecent Cloudpager provides dynamic deployment, rapid scaling, and cutting-edge technology suitable for complex environments. Cloudpager’s innovative approach justifies its premium for businesses desiring advanced functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parallels RAS's simplified setup and responsive support facilitate quick deployment across various infrastructures. Numecent Cloudpager offers extensive deployment flexibility with a steeper learning curve. Parallels ensures accessible, consistent assistance, while Cloudpager requires more technical interaction, appealing to knowledgeable teams.

Pricing and ROI: Parallels RAS has an appealing pricing structure with lower initial costs and quicker ROI, suitable for budget-conscious organizations. Numecent Cloudpager, though more expensive initially, offers long-term value with innovative solutions, attracting enterprises focused on advanced technologies. Parallels RAS is more budget-friendly, whereas Cloudpager aligns with its sophisticated offerings for strategic growth.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Virtualization Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Application Virtualization

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,042 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Numecent Cloudpager

Ranking in Application Virtualization

5th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Parallels Remote Applicatio...

Ranking in Application Virtualization

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Virtualization category, the mindshare of Numecent Cloudpager is 13.3%, up from 11.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) is 16.4%, up from 14.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Virtualization

Featured Reviews

it_user749919

Application Packager at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

Being able to deploy applications which use drivers has allowed us to virtualise more applications than with other solutions

Isolation layering Driver virtualisation Licence management Usage tracking Plugin integration Being able to deploy applications which use drivers has allowed us to virtualise more applications than with other solutions. Self-service Portal. More than eight years. No. No. No, it scales very…

Read full review

JohanSkibdahl

CEO at Etcetera Networks

Secure access across devices with cost-effective seamless integration

One valuable feature is the ability to securely use a wide range of devices to access the company's infrastructure. The inclusion of all necessary components, such as load balancer and gateways, in a monthly fee is also beneficial. In terms of Parallels Desktop, the coherence mode that allows Mac and Windows applications to run seamlessly side by side is highly regarded.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Driver virtualisation"

"Thin client management (Windows 10 client) provides an easy way to lock down client connection to the remote infrastructure. Policies are very helpful for preconfiguring client behavior. Finally, client management is easy."

"We use Cloudpaging to package and deploy the vast majority of our applications to our standard Windows 10 desktops. With the use of Parallels integration into Software2 AppsAnywhere hub, this means we can use the same packages to deliver Windows applications to almost any device - Windows, mac OS, iOS, Android, Linux, Xbox One, PS4 - just by ticking a box."

"Allows us to publish applications accessible by current-generation HTML5 browser or OS-specific client (Windows, Android, iOS), and it supports popular single sign-on and multi-factor authentication protocols."

"The most valuable feature is the ease with which you can publish applications to different groups of users, by integrating with Windows Active Directory."

"Simplicity of the interface is a valuable feature."

"It provides flexible access to Windows applications from many types of devices."

"Valuable features include the ability to set up security groups for accessing certain apps, and the ability to add apps easily and centrally without touching the servers they’re hosted on."

"The stability is ok - once I finished the setup, the system was quite stable."

More Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) pros

Cons

"Self-service Portal."

"The main issue we have with all of our users is printing. Randomly, a printer will disconnect or someone won't connect to it and I will have to reset the print service and then nobody can print. That's the big headache we've had over the course of the five years."

"If the solution crashes, then all the customers connected through that agent, lose their session."

"Since I've been here less than a year, I have had to upgrade the system three times. The first time was the major upgrade but they have upgraded twice since, and I think that's too many times in that time span."

"From a seller's point of view, there are a lot of things that they could do better in the sales cycle."

"It would be great if there were more sophisticated GPO templates/options."

"The product does not utilize SQL for reporting purposes. Also, it does not support some hypervisors similar to Citrix. These particular areas need improvement."

"Sometimes you need to understand how to use load balancing and the gateway in order to scale, which means the team may need some additional technical knowledge."

"The customization of the web interface could possibly use some improvement. Little things, like being able to place a background image instead of just choosing from a palette of colors, would be nice."

More Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Work with the vendor, as this is a fairly new product and they want use cases. Deals can be made."

"Parallels is a cost effective alternative to Citrix."

"I don't like the subscription model because it feels like I have to pay every month. If Parallels could go back to the professional license, it would be much better."

"The product is not expensive. I rate its pricing a three or four out of ten."

"I recommend testing Parallels and comparing it to your needs. Compare the prices against what you are able to do with the product and its alternatives. Parallels is not a cheap product."

"It is inexpensive compared to one of its competitors."

"The pricing has always been competitive, and the new SPLA licensing model works great for our business and clients."

"It justifies the price. In terms of licensing, initially when we got the product it was an unlimited licensing strategy. We knew would grow in the coming years. So initially, we took a plan which had no limit. After a year or so the strategy changed and we were being limited to 105 licenses, that was the minimum... If there was flexibility for increasing the number of licenses that would be great because you never know how much you are going to grow in the next year."

More Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,042 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

30%

Energy/Utilities Company

14%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

13%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS)?

The solution is powerful, and it has good speed and performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS)?

The pricing for Parallels RAS is straightforward with a monthly fee for a minimum of 15 licenses. For Parallels Desktop, it is a yearly cost of a couple of hundred euros. No additional fees for mai...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS)?

A potential improvement could be reducing the dependency on Microsoft solutions for Parallels RAS. As for Parallels Desktop, there is nothing specific that needs improvement.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft App-V vs Numecent Cloudpager

Compared 100% of the time

More Numecent Cloudpager Competitors

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS)

Compared 34% of the time

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS)

Compared 25% of the time

Horizon 8 vs Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS)

Compared 11% of the time

Parallels Desktop vs Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS)

Compared 8% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS)

Compared 6% of the time

More Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Virtualization

April 2025

Download Numecent Cloudpager product report

Buyer's Guide

Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS)

April 2025

Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) report

Download Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) product report

Also Known As

No data available

Parallels RAS

Overview

Numecent Cloudpager offers a comprehensive cloud management experience tailored for seamless application delivery, improving operational efficiency and resource utilization.

Numecent Cloudpager streamlines application management, reducing deployment time and enhancing security. It integrates seamlessly, making it a preferred choice for businesses aiming to optimize their cloud strategies. It supports rapid deployment across platforms, ensuring flexibility and scalability while maintaining data integrity and compliance. Its architecture caters to dynamic workloads and varying enterprise requirements, standing out for its adaptability and reliability.

What are the key features of Numecent Cloudpager?

Seamless Application Delivery: Facilitates efficient application provisioning without traditional installation barriers.
Robust Security: Incorporates enterprise-grade security protocols to safeguard data.
Scalability: Supports expanding business needs with elastic resource allocation.
Multi-Platform Compatibility: Ensures wide-ranging compatibility across different operating systems.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Cost-Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary overheads by optimizing resource allocation.
Time Savings: Streamlines operations, allowing quick implementation and minimizing downtime.
Enhanced Productivity: Frees up IT resources for strategic tasks by automating repetitive processes.
Improved Compliance: Assists in adhering to industry regulations with secure and traceable operations.

In the financial sector, Numecent Cloudpager simplifies complex data handling and ensures rapid deployment, crucial for timely transactions and reporting. In healthcare, it supports secure patient data applications, maintaining compliance with healthcare regulations. Retailers benefit from agile deployment, enhancing customer experiences with fast-paced initiatives.

Numecent

ApplicationServer delivers applications, data and virtual desktops from a central location, providing continuous availability, resource-based load-balancing and complete network transparency.

Parallels

Sample Customers

Kingston University London, Construction Executive, Ascentech K.K, Fast Company, Geekout365

Arsari Group _ PT Netmarks Indonesia, Izhevsk Elektromekhanicheskiy Zavod (IEMZ) _ Kupol, Abilene Diagnostic Clinic, Fylde Borough Council, YARSTROYREZE LLC, VSK Insurance House, Melenkovsky District of Vladimirskaya Oblast, Sofrigam SA, Antenna International, KingsGate Community Church, Norwegian American Hospital, Island Hotels Group, Medway Council, Medway Council, Voices of September 11th, MacDonald Training Center, Kansas Childrenês Service League, Scope,Next Generation Clubs, WTC Communications, Opera Australia, HSE Integrated, Danier, Bridgwater College, Kern County Mental Health, Tony Tiendas, Spears Manufacturing, Managed Insurance Services Inc., Intuitive Medical Software, M.J. Soffe, Mazda Motors, Israel Military Industries (IMI), Telfair, Upic Solutions, Teleflora, Fisher & Company

Buyer's Guide

Application Virtualization

April 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, Parallels and others in Application Virtualization. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,042 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Virtualization vendors.

We monitor all Application Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.