Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Teams vs Zoom comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.2
Microsoft Teams enhances collaboration and efficiency, saving time, reducing costs, and proving valuable during remote work.
Sentiment score
7.8
Zoom boosts productivity and ROI by enabling efficient remote meetings, eliminating travel costs, and integrating seamlessly with businesses.
Zoom definitely saves time and makes my work more efficient.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.6
Many prefer internal support as Microsoft's assistance varies in responsiveness and effectiveness, influenced by support tier and call volume.
Sentiment score
6.0
Zoom's ease of use reduces support needs, with mixed user satisfaction in response quality and availability of training resources.
Microsoft support is excellent, offering instantaneous assistance through either robo support or live personnel.
I have logged tickets for Office 365 and received responses within 24 hours, depending on the severity.
If there's an issue, I reach out to their support, and they respond quickly without major problems.
There is a wealth of information available on the internet because many users have asked for support and the solutions are published online.
On the rare occasions when I had issues, they were resolved in a few hours, indicating a good overall experience.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Microsoft Teams scales efficiently for varied user sizes, with seamless integration and some potential file storage challenges.
Sentiment score
7.4
Zoom efficiently handles diverse user capacities, from small meetings to large events, ensuring seamless performance and scalability.
Microsoft Teams is scalable, and I have successfully conducted sessions with close to forty people without significant issues.
Scalability is good.
Microsoft Teams automatically removes noise.
It would be ideal if there was an automatic scaling option where you could pay for increased capacity as needed.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Microsoft Teams is stable with minor network-related issues, receiving high ratings for reliability and robust cross-device functionality.
Sentiment score
7.9
Zoom offers stable performance with minimal glitches; connectivity issues are rare, and users rate it highly for reliability.
Microsoft Teams is stable once the setup is completed properly.
I didn't have any problem with Zoom, and overall with Zoom, there are no connection issues, stability, or performance problems.
It does take up a lot of computer bandwidth, which can slow down performance, especially when I'm sharing screens.
Zoom is very stable.
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Teams requires enhanced integration, improved performance, better UI, security, and new AI features for optimal user experience.
Zoom needs better security, stability, and integrations, along with improved UI, audio/video quality, and chat functions.
AI capabilities should be integrated into Microsoft Teams to provide better transcript services and offer multiple language support.
The biggest issue with Microsoft Teams is switching identities, especially when communicating with external organizations.
Microsoft Teams could be improved through more synchronization with other platforms like Calendly and Gmail.
For students, it would be beneficial to have access through the university for longer meetings.
Sometimes there's an issue with changing links to meetings if someone is the organizer and then they're not anymore.
There is potential for Zoom to integrate functionalities like Gong, offering sales insights and follow-up suggestions.
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Teams is cost-effective, often bundled with Office 365, offering flexible, affordable pricing with some geographical and feature-based variations.
Zoom offers a free version; paid plans vary in cost, with pricing based on features and user needs.
Microsoft Teams is economical when purchased as part of an Office 365 bundle.
Microsoft Teams comes with Office 365 licenses like E3, but there are options for those who prefer not to pay for Teams by using alternative products like Slack.
For education use, having more affordable access through institutions would be beneficial.
Zoom could make its pricing more reasonable for individual users.
Zoom is free for individual users, which is a significant benefit compared to Microsoft Teams, which is a paid service.
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Teams excels in communication and collaboration with robust features, Office 365 integration, and flexible, user-friendly access.
Zoom's user-friendly interface, high-quality features, and efficient connectivity make it ideal for businesses, educators, and remote work.
Teams offers the ability to record sessions and store them in OneDrive, which provides 1 terabyte of space.
The platform is user-friendly and has positively impacted our communication, allowing us to communicate with people from different countries and cities in real time.
It serves everything in one place and improves communication within organizations.
I find screen sharing, video options, providing remote access, chatting, raising hands, and interactive features during meetings to be extremely valuable.
the ability to share your screen
Zoom is user-friendly, straightforward, and easy to connect with.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Teams
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
166
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Social Software (1st)
Zoom
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
225
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of Microsoft Teams is 3.0%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zoom is 11.2%, down from 13.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Virtual Meetings
 

Featured Reviews

Arun Srivastav - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamless presentation and collaboration enhance organizational productivity
There are three main areas for improvement: Firstly, AI capabilities should be integrated into Microsoft Teams to provide better transcript services and offer multiple language support. Secondly, it should allow participants to remain visible during presentations, enhancing interaction. Lastly, it needs broader integration capabilities with other products, like Salesforce ( /vendors/salesforce ), which is currently limited.
Luiz Kazan - PeerSpot reviewer
Utilizing versatile features for efficient personal and work meetings
Zoom offers a number of interesting and valuable features. One of the most interesting is the ability to share only audio and provide ambient music without sharing a screen. The breakout room feature is much more developed than other solutions, allowing users to stay in the same meeting and move to different rooms and back to the main room. The sharing features are great for projecting people who should be in focus. Another valuable feature is the virtual entrance, which uses a username and password recognized by the Zoom system, showing the person's full name and ID. Additionally, the use of video and a good fixed background improves visibility compared to other applications. These features differentiate Zoom from others.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
44%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
5%
Educational Organization
86%
University
2%
Financial Services Firm
2%
Computer Software Company
2%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Teams?
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
Microsoft Teams comes with Office 365 ( /products/office-365-reviews ) licenses like E3, but there are options for those who prefer not to pay for Teams by using alternative products like Slack ( /...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
The biggest issue with Microsoft Teams is switching identities, especially when communicating with external organizations. Users often don't know they have messages from another company unless they...
LucidChart vs LucidSpark for brainstorming sessions over Zoom
Hi @Krista Thompson ​ - Yes, LucidSpark is a much more nimble and, in some ways, user-friendly tool than LucidChart. LucidSpark is designed to do a better job managing multiple users participating ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zoom?
Zoom offers a free version for up to forty minutes.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

MS Teams
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
Fortinet, Veeva, Proofpoint, Box, Ticketmaster, Trend Micro, Caesars Entertainment, Santa Clara University, Pandora, Stanford Continuing Studies
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Teams vs. Zoom and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.