We performed a comparison between Microsoft Project Server and Project Objects based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Asana and others in Project Management Software."The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to understand and navigate."
"The key things are managing interactions, resource allocation, resource-leveling (enterprise) and as a collaborative tool, because we use it across multiple projects at a time."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the tool's reporting is very good."
"The technical support for Microsoft Project Server and the support is very good. Microsoft support is working very well."
"Microsoft Project Server is easy to use compared to other similar solutions, such as Primavera. It functions similar to Excel or others Microsoft solutions which makes it simple for most people to be able to use right away."
"Resource allocation is the most valuable feature of Microsoft Project Server."
"The most valuable features are the gantt charts. It's easy to use for me."
"The solution scales well."
"Configuring the platform does not require the writing of any code."
"This is a good product but we have struggled with stability from time to time. The service has stopped intermittently and it has been difficult to find a reason why."
"The product is difficult to use for complex projects."
"Stability of the solution is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"Work needs to be done on collaboration with SharePoint."
"The reporting aspects can be improved, which is one of the reasons why I'm using Qlik Sense. In the older on-prem versions, reporting was lackluster, to say the least. Project Online has a better handle on that. However, we will still be using Qlik Sense. We're also looking at an add-on app from a company called OnePlan that adds some additional functionality where Microsoft is not as clean in its approach for things such as portfolio management and some of the trends analysis."
"When a lot of users logged onto the site, it took a big toll on the service. Therefore, there is a scalability issue."
"The solution must provide Agile and AI features."
"The solution could have more compact dashboards, such as one finds with Planview."
"A lot of companies are investing heavily in artificial intelligence, so more such features would benefit this product."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Project Server is ranked 6th in Project Portfolio Management with 55 reviews while Project Objects is ranked 71st in Project Management Software. Microsoft Project Server is rated 7.8, while Project Objects is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "Provides holistic reporting and allows us to keep track of what's going on with projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Project Objects writes "Responsive support, good third-party integration, and offers hybrid-mode project management". Microsoft Project Server is most compared with Microsoft Project, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Planisware, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management and JIRA Portfolio, whereas Project Objects is most compared with .
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
