Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse comparison

Microsoft and SAP are both solutions in the Data Warehouse category. Microsoft is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.3, while SAP is ranked #21. Microsoft holds a 2.9% mindshare in Data Warehouse, compared to SAP’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Parallel Data War...

Read 40 Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse reviews

1,570 Views
1,178 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

SAP NetWeaver Business Ware...

Read 9 SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse reviews

857 Views
617 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Microsoft Parallel Data War...

SAP NetWeaver Business Ware...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse and SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse compete in the realm of enterprise data warehousing. Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse appears to have the upper hand in terms of cost efficiency and integration within its ecosystem, whereas SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse excels in data modeling within the SAP universe.

Features: Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is known for its performance boost, offering 10-100X faster data loading operations, ease of integration with Microsoft products like Power BI, and its ability to store and process data efficiently. SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse features extensive data modeling capabilities, strong ETL functionalities, and integrated business intelligence tools, providing convenient data management and reporting capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse could enhance its non-Microsoft ecosystem integration, simplify setup processes, and improve data management flexibility. SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse may benefit from simplifying its data modeling approaches, enhancing scalability of its performance, and streamlining user interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse supports varied deployment models, including public, private, on-premises, and hybrid clouds, providing extensive flexibility for different IT environments. SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse primarily focuses on on-premises and private cloud deployments, which might limit some options. Both offer competent customer service, though there are calls for improved responsiveness and support quality.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse provides flexible pricing models fitting organizational needs, especially when paired with Azure, making it cost-effective for large-scale operations. SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse generally incurs higher costs due to licensing, particularly additional user licenses. Despite this, both solutions deliver significant returns on investment by meeting performance expectations consistently.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 890,124 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Parallel Data War...

Ranking in Data Warehouse

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP NetWeaver Business Ware...

Ranking in Data Warehouse

21st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is 2.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse is 2.1%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Warehouse Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse	2.9%
SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse	2.1%
Other	95.0%

Data Warehouse

Featured Reviews

HassanFatemi

CEO at Smart Data-Driven Solutions

Has handled large volumes of data effectively but still needs cost flexibility

There could be improvements on the cost side of Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse because it is still considered to be quite expensive by a lot of users, and many companies are not interested in solutions with parallel data warehousing due to this expense. Addressing the cost would be the number one area for improvement. Additionally, I have not worked recently with it, so I don't know if this feature already exists, but if it doesn't, having an elastic feature that adjusts the service's power dynamically based on the workload would be beneficial instead of fixing the power at a specific level.

Read full review

AnilKumar38

Project Manager - Analytics at Mindsprint

Can transform data per clients' needs and can easily distribute reports to end users

I would recommend looking at all of the solutions currently available and then decide. I would not immediately suggest going for SAP NetWeaver. Being able to transform the data according to my requirements is a crucial feature; the phasing layers are helpful to distinguish data with respect to a specific project; analytics and reporting are very feasible; and the distribution of reports to the end users is also very easy. However, connectors need to be simplified, and technical support needs to be improved. Thus, on a scale from one to ten, I would rate SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse at eight.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The biggest advantage of Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is the possibility to stop or pause the service because it can be very expensive, and the ability to pause the service when I don't use it is probably the main feature, along with the possibility to handle huge amounts of data, which is quite an interesting capability of the service."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The most valuable feature for me is querying."

"Everything about the solution is great."

"Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse provides good firewall processing in terms of response time."

"Its scalability is impressive as it scales up and down really well, we go from a couple of users to tons of users all the time, and it scales and handles things really well."

"The most valuable feature is that we can deploy directly to the production environment, rather than having to go through a development environment first."

More Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse pros

"With SAP BW, the organization can start to deploy a data warehouse and deliver data to business people."

"It is a robust system."

"We are an airline and use the system for data modeling and data warehousing, and we implement it for time performance and feedback analysis."

"It's an excellent over-all tool for managers to analyze their business."

"The security and audit procedures are the most valuable features."

"This is a very robust and efficient product, and it's very powerful, in particular when it comes to data management in the SAP system."

"Data cleansed and harmonization. It provides us with proof of data, we can centralize all of the information, check it, and then provide the information to our users."

"A robust and efficient product."

More SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse pros

Cons

"The patch releases are a concern. For a customer with tons of servers, frequent patches lead to required reboots, which interrupts business."

"The only issue with the product is that the process is very slow when we have a huge amount of data."

"This solution would be improved with an option for in-memory data analysis."

"When there are many users or many expensive queries, it can be very slow."

"Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is excellent but very expensive. Working on the pricing could make it a better solution."

"I think that the error messages need to be made more specific."

"I would like to see better visualization features."

"It needs more compatibility with common BI tools."

More Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse cons

"There are performance issues in terms of scalability and availability."

"I think more integration with other applications would be perfect."

"The solution could be improved by simplifying the modeling and the design. We're faced with too many options and too many object types."

"The program is difficult to learn to use"

"The product could provide more features."

"The setup needs skilled resources in SAP BW. A lack of trained resources can create serious problems."

"I think more integration with other applications would be perfect."

"Connectors are complex, and it is difficult to understand or know which connector should be used. For instance, if I want to connect APIs, I will not be able to do it directly. I would have to go to the portal integration to get the data. Therefore, having simplified connectors will make things much easier."

More SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Technical support is an additional fee and is expensive."

"Microsoft has an agreement with the government in our country, so our customers get their licensing costs from the Ministry. Whenever we work with any government, company, or government institute, which is mainly what we are doing, that license comes directly from the Ministry of Technology and Information."

"The solution is cost-effective."

"The tool could be expensive if we need to manage a lot of data."

"They offer an annual subscription. The pricing depends on the size of the environments."

"The solution's pricing is fairly decent for organizations with huge data sizes."

"I think the program is well-priced compared to the other offerings that are out in the market."

"All the features that we use do not require any additional subscription or yearly fees."

"All SAP products are expensive."

"The licensing cost is high for SAP NetWeaver compared to that for other products."

"Pricing is based on the number of user IDs and tyhe user ID works across a suite of products."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

890,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Marketing Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	22

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse?

Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is very expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse?

The pricing could be better; I think it actually just went up.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse?

The basic use case for us is virtual machines. In real estate, we use it for our operations. They handle large data sets well, and the performance is good during those times.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Oracle Exadata vs Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse

Compared 10% of the time

Teradata vs Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) vs Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse

Compared 6% of the time

biGENIUS vs Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse

Compared 5% of the time

Actian Ingres vs Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse Competitors

Teradata vs SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse

Compared 14% of the time

SAP BW4HANA vs SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse

Compared 10% of the time

Actian Ingres vs SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Database Appliance vs SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse

Compared 6% of the time

SAP Business Warehouse vs SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse

Compared 6% of the time

More SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse

April 2026

Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse report

Download Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse

April 2026

Download SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse product report

Also Known As

Microsoft PDW, SQL Server Data Warehouse, Microsoft SQL Server Parallel Data Warehouse, MS Parallel Data Warehouse

NetWeaver Business Warehouse, NetWeaver BusinessObjects Warehouse

Overview

Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse offers high performance and usability with seamless SQL Server integration, handling large data efficiently with a user-friendly interface. Known for its cost-effectiveness and robust security, it excels in integrating data across Microsoft ecosystem.

Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse efficiently manages large datasets from diverse sources, supporting a unified data approach. Its integration with SQL Server and compatibility with tools like Qlik enhances data management and decision-making capabilities. With impressive scalability and security features, it is widely used in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and logistics for analytics and reporting. However, users seek improvements in integration with non-Microsoft layers, memory usage, SQL configuration, and scalability.

What are the key features of Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse?

Clustered Columnstore Index: Boosts performance for complex queries.
SQL Server Integration: Seamless connectivity with Microsoft's database solutions.
Data Volume Handling: Efficient management of large datasets.
Cost Management: Ability to pause operations for cost savings.
Security Measures: Ensures robust data protection.

What benefits do users expect when evaluating Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse?

Performance Efficiency: High-speed data processing capabilities.
Cost-Effectiveness: Suitable pricing model in specific scenarios.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Integration Capabilities: Compatibility with Microsoft products and SQL Server.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and logistics, Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse supports analytics, reporting, and decision-making processes. Organizations utilize it to maintain historical data, develop business intelligence models, and create actionable dashboards, benefiting from its integration with key tools and efficient data management.

Microsoft

SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse is a comprehensive data warehousing solution offering extensive data modeling and integrated BI tools. It provides SAP ERP connectors, ETL features, and tools for robust reporting. Users appreciate its security, data harmonization, and centralization of information.

SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse features predefined content for easy setup and extensive BI tools for powerful reporting. It facilitates data cleansings and harmonization. Users find the platform's automation of data loads and cell calculations efficient, supporting time-changing dimensions and complex logic in MIS report generation. While it excels in data analysis and reporting across industries, the complexity in deployment and user interface suggests room for improvement in user-friendliness and integration capabilities across applications, including mobile devices. Multilingual support can enhance user experience, while connectors and reporting tools can be simplified for better usability.

What are the key features of SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse?

Predefined Content: Facilitates easy initiation as a data warehouse
SAP ERP Connectors: Standard connectors for seamless integration
Integrated BI Tools: Powerful tools for robust reporting and analysis
Data Modeling & ETL: Extensive features for data structuring and transformation
Automation: Efficient data loads and cell calculation processes

What benefits should you consider in reviews?

Data Security: Robust procedures ensuring data protection
Centralized Information: Harmonized data centralization for ease of access
Comprehensive Reporting: Advanced tools to generate complex reports
Efficient Performance: Automation and transformation capabilities improving productivity

In the automotive industry, dealers apply SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse for MIS report generation, while FMCG firms use it for data modeling. Business intelligence teams across HR, finance, and service sectors leverage its analytical capabilities. Airline companies utilize its tools for performance metrics and customer analytics, enabling enhanced data visualization across regions.

SAP

Sample Customers

Auckland Transport, Erste Bank Group, Urban Software Institute, NJVC, Sheraton Hotels and Resorts, Tata Steel Europe

EMC Corporation, Takisada-Osaka Co. Ltd., Eldorado, Mozzart, The VELUX Group, AOK Bundesverband, Hilti Group, Nissha Printing Company Ltd., Asian Paints, Aareal Bank Group, Magazine zum Globus (Migros Group)

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse

April 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

890,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse report.

See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors.

We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.