Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance comparison

Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] and Microsoft Purview Data Governance are both solutions in the Microsoft Security Suite category. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of Microsoft Purview Data Governance users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Purview Data Gove...
Read 58 Microsoft Purview Data Governance reviews
  • 18,784 Views
  • 3,569 Comparison Views
84% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] and Microsoft Purview Data Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Microsoft Security Suite solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 866,218 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Entra Permissions...
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) (7th)
Microsoft Purview Data Gove...
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
58
Ranking in other categories
Data Governance (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (8th)
 

Featured Reviews

Sameer Bhat - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides resource-based access and security, but time-bound access can be a problem
Entra ID is the core of the identity management that we have. This is the key product that we are using. I am currently also looking into Entra Private Access because we are planning to deploy about 50,000 desktops into Azure and use Azure Virtual Desktop. We would like to give access to the users from the desktop to on-premises applications. I learned that Entra Private Access is a good solution. That is not yet GA, but that is what we are looking for. Entra provides a single pane of glass for managing user access, but because our company also integrates with Nebula API, only administrators use Entra's pane. A normal person who wants to get onboarded can do self-service using Nebula. The features for whitelisting and other things are definitely there. That is what we use specifically. Application IDs, enterprise applications, and all those things are already there, so we have more efficiency. There is also security because we usually do not allow user identities to get direct access to Azure resources. Usually, we use the service principles from Entra ID, so this way, it increases security. Entra has helped to save time for our IT administrators. We tend to automate a lot of things. We can do automation using Graph APIs and save time. It is hard to quantify the time savings, but there has been a medium amount of time savings. Entra has helped to save our organization money. We care about security and risk more than money, but it also saves money. We are premium customers, and because we have a commit-to-consume contract with Microsoft of multi-million dollars, the money does not come into it because we have to consume those resources.
Read full review
AmrNaeem - PeerSpot reviewer
It helps us by reporting on and auditing leaks and breaches
One important feature is data security, which both end users and the organization seek. Microsoft Purview offers data protection across a multi-cloud and multi-platform environment. It's critical that Purview connects to iOS, Mac, and Android. We could only secure some of our data if it only covered Windows. It provides a comprehensive view of the entire ecosystem's threats and compliance in real time. It's very easy to use. Purview's compliance features are crucial. We have to match some cases in other countries to our own to comply with the policies, procedures, and regulatory frameworks here.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Multifactor authentication is valuable."
"The solution integrates well with our infrastructure and other systems without any issues."
"It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies."
"We can prevent, block, or audit however we like."
"It is critical that Purview delivers data protection across multi-cloud and multi-platform environments. That is the number one reason that people are adopting hybrid and best-of-the-breed approaches. Especially in banking, it is critical because people want to protect, govern, and secure their data. This is one of the first conversations that happens with security and the architecture group on the client side."
"Microsoft Purview's primary benefit lies in safeguarding sensitive and confidential data, thereby mitigating the risk of internal data exfiltration."
"Has a good interface and is reasonably priced."
"Microsoft Purview offers data protection across a multi-cloud and multi-platform environment."
"Their data labeling or data classification is particularly valuable because we want to categorize all of our data into confidential, public, or internal."
"The sensitivity labeling is the most valuable feature because it is the foundation for automating the encryption process and ensuring proper data handling across the organization."
More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pros
 

Cons

"We use a third-party API called Nebula API to integrate the account for authorization. The time-bound access area in Entra can be a problem. It can be improved in terms of the granularity of the permissions."
"The solution's pricing and support services need improvement."
"I lose a little bit of that control when we're talking about third-party connectors. Compliance-wise, I would like to see more ability to audit from a user perspective, where I could extrapolate what the user was thinking or trying to do."
"Enhancing the tool's capability to connect to multiple sources would be valuable."
"We've had a few issues with the scanner. It runs perfectly one day, and on another day, it will run the whole night. It's probably related to the rules. If I set some compliance rules and apply the rules to any column, I can't delete it. I have to disable it and reactivate it."
"If we could have a view something like we have in CrowdStrike—which is, I believe, the biggest competitor to Microsoft when it comes to security—a node nodal view, which we also have in Defender, that would make it a more complete, one-stop solution. That would save a lot of time for the admins and the engineers."
"It supports only a limited number of tools and technologies that pertain to Microsoft products. If you want to leverage other solutions such as Workday or Oracle Fusion, features will be coming up, but as of now, it is for the Microsoft suite."
"Overcoming certain control issues would significantly enhance our overall satisfaction."
"There are some limitations with regard to the lineage of data from different parts of the system."
"One of the challenges is that Microsoft changes things so quickly that sometimes you're just playing catch-up, and sometimes these changes aren't communicated effectively."
More Microsoft Purview Data Governance cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product cost is in the mid to high range."
"We are a Fortune 500 company, so we always negotiate with Microsoft."
"The price is reasonable because most of our clients already have an E3 license, which makes implementation easy."
"People often and unjustly say that Microsoft product pricing is not in the scope of reality, that it's just too expensive at times. I do not feel that is the case at all... If I'm able to let go of 30 to 70 percent of my IT administration staff, that makes up for a lot of money."
"The pricing depends on the client's requirements and the number of applications."
"I consider it cost-efficient because of the metrics it provides."
"The interesting part is how they are bundling the version into the E5 stack. If it was not for that inclusion, this would have been a difficult conversation for us, so kudos to Microsoft on that. Separating it out may become a problem for customer retention. It is definitely a good move on Microsoft's part to include it as part of any existing or any system upgrades for customers that were on E3."
"The price is reasonable considering its value."
"While Purview's standard pricing might not be accessible to most small businesses, we were fortunate to benefit from the educational pricing which made it a financially viable option for our needs."
"The categorization within the licensing could be improved. There are a lot of solutions within Microsoft Purview. If the licensing could be a bit clearer and the solutions could be better categorized according to function and across multiple environments, that would be excellent. The licensing is very confusing."
More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Microsoft Security Suite solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
866,218 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise30
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Entra Permissions Management?
Multifactor authentication is valuable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Entra Permissions Management?
The product cost is in the mid to high range. You need to have a good budget to implement it, so it is considered fairly expensive for our market. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Entra Permissions Management?
The solution's pricing and support services need improvement.
See all answers
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Purview?
It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Purview?
Microsoft Purview Data Governance is quite affordable compared to other market solutions, which have high initial costs. It allows for a cost-effective start with negligible initial cost. However, ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Purview?
There should be more clarity about the costing, particularly how the cost is calculated, especially when utilizing health reports and quality features. Additionally, adding more tools around data q...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Logo
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
Compared 27% of the time
Saviynt vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Logo
Saviynt vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
Compared 21% of the time
Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
Compared 18% of the time
VMware Aria Automation vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Logo
VMware Aria Automation vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
Compared 18% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
Compared 16% of the time
More Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Competitors
Collibra Governance vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance Logo
Collibra Governance vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance
Compared 16% of the time
Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance Logo
Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance
Compared 15% of the time
Alation Data Catalog vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance Logo
Alation Data Catalog vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance
Compared 9% of the time
Collibra Lineage vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance Logo
Collibra Lineage vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance
Compared 7% of the time
Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance Logo
Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance
Compared 5% of the time
More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM)
August 2025
Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] reportDownload Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Purview Data Governance
August 2025
Microsoft Purview Data Governance reportDownload Microsoft Purview Data Governance product report
 

Also Known As

CloudKnox Permissions Management
Microsoft Purview, MS Azure Purview
 

Overview

Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] provides robust access control and identity management, enhancing security by optimizing permissions and reducing risk.

This advanced platform offers comprehensive capabilities designed to streamline identity management. It empowers organizations to manage permissions efficiently, enhancing security frameworks while addressing compliance needs. By focusing on visibility and control, it optimizes access to ensure the right resources are available to the right users, reducing excessive permission grants and potential security vulnerabilities.

What are the main features of Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]?
  • Advanced Visibility: Gain insights into permissions to identify and address security risks.
  • Access Optimization: Align permissions with actual usage to prevent over-privileged access.
  • Compliance Integration: Streamline compliance processes with built-in reporting tools.
What benefits should you consider when evaluating Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]?
  • Improved Security Posture: Reduces risk by eliminating excessive permissions.
  • Enhanced Compliance: Eases regulatory compliance with robust auditing features.
  • Operational Efficiency: Saves time and resources by automating permission management.

In specific industries like finance and healthcare, Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] plays a crucial role in maintaining data integrity and regulatory compliance. Its implementation allows organizations to seamlessly integrate permission management into existing security infrastructures, providing tailored solutions that address sector-specific requirements and challenges.

Microsoft

The new Microsoft Purview portal offers an enhanced governance experience, serving as a unified platform for managing and governing data across various sources, including Azure, Microsoft 365, on-premises, and multicloud environments. Designed to streamline governance, compliance, risk, and security efforts, the new portal provides a user-friendly interface and unlocks advanced features like live view and preset scans. Existing users of Microsoft Purview can upgrade to this enhanced experience, gaining access to improved user interface, enhanced capabilities, and consolidated management of data assets. Additionally, the upgrade sets the stage for future developments, including account consolidation and fine-grained access control.

Microsoft
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance
July 2025
Free Report: Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
866,218 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance report.
See our list of best Microsoft Security Suite vendors.

We monitor all Microsoft Security Suite reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.