Microsoft Entra ID vs NetIQ Access Manager comparison

Microsoft and OpenText are both solutions in the Access Management category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7, while OpenText is ranked #21. Microsoft holds a 28.0% mindshare in AM, compared to OpenText’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Entra ID

Read 234 Microsoft Entra ID reviews

8,069 Views
6,157 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

NetIQ Access Manager

Read 5 NetIQ Access Manager reviews

396 Views
260 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID

NetIQ Access Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

NetIQ Access Manager and Microsoft Entra ID are both widely used in identity and access management. Microsoft Entra ID seems to have the upper hand due to its superior features, making users feel it is worth the price.

Features: NetIQ Access Manager users value its adaptability with different systems, robust security measures, and competitive pricing. Microsoft Entra ID is noted for its comprehensive cloud integration, advanced authentication mechanisms, and extensive features.

Room For Improvement: NetIQ Access Manager users suggest enhancing its reporting tools, streamlining updates, and improving offline functionality. Microsoft Entra ID users desire better offline functionality, more intuitive setup processes, and enhanced support for hybrid environments.

Ease Of Deployment and Customer Service: NetIQ Access Manager is appreciated for its straightforward installation and reliable customer support. Microsoft Entra ID’s deployment is perceived as more challenging, but its customer service is highly responsive.

Pricing and ROI: NetIQ Access Manager is favored for its lower setup costs, leading to quicker ROI. Microsoft Entra ID, though perceived as more expensive, is considered worth the investment due to its extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Entra ID vs. NetIQ Access Manager Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. NetIQ Access Manager

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,491 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Entra ID

Ranking in Access Management

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

234

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (1st), Authentication Systems (1st), Identity Management (IM) (1st), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (2nd)

NetIQ Access Manager

Ranking in Access Management

21st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Access Management (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Access Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 28.0%, up from 23.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetIQ Access Manager is 1.0%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Access Management

Featured Reviews

Bahram Piri

Chief Executive Officer & Founder at IDmelon Technologies

Security focus and seamless implementation increase platform productivity

Microsoft Entra ID can be improved in many ways, and there's a big wish list.If we're focusing on security, something that I definitely expect is improvement in the UI and UX for frontline workers. This is important, especially for non-tech savvy individuals. It is something Microsoft Entra ID could do to improve for a wider audience. It's important to focus on the frontline workers since they are non-tech savvy individuals. They are not like those back-office engineering C-level employees who are constantly dealing with computers, and we need to build a specific user experience and user interface for them to handle this stuff. That's something I expect Microsoft to focus on more for Microsoft Entra ID.

Read full review

Cassio-Silva

Technology director at Asyg

Multi-Factor Authentication, stable, and extremely scalable

I use NetIQ Access Manager to protect one single application with Multi-Factor Authentication. The solution is deployed on both cloud and on-prem The Multi-Factor Authentication of NetIQ Access Manager has helped protect our organization. The most valuable features of NetIQ Access Manager are…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most important things of Azure Active Directory are the security and the facility to manage all the services and users. It is very easy to manage users and assign roles, permissions, and access. At the same time, it is a very secure environment. Microsoft takes security very seriously. They take care of all the security and all the factors to prevent any kind of data or information compromise."

"This solution serves as the basis to understand the MS SSO and MFA capabilities."

"It is a central point where we provide the cloud lock-in for our company. We focus the multi-factor authentication within Azure AD before jumping to other clouds or software as a service offerings. So, it is the central point when you need to access something for our company within the cloud. You go to Azure AD and can authenticate there, then you move from there to the target destination or the single sign-on."

"Azure AD allowed us to get rid of servers and other hardware running at our offices. We moved everything to the cloud. Once we set up roles and permissions, it's only a matter of adding people and removing people from different groups and letting permissions flow through."

"The ability to see and control PCs and mobile devices is the most valuable. I can see where they are and how many we have. I can also see the age and retention of PCs."

"A use case that we did for an end user in a manufacturing organization: We used WVD with biometric authentication because 1,500 processes need to happen in a process. The user didn't want to use a login using their credentials. They wanted to use fingerprinting or tap their ID. That is where we integrated with the authentication. Now, they can process in a couple of hours, and they run those 1,500 processes every day. This changed their login process, which improved the manufacturing process. This helped a lot for their high deployment."

"The visibility and control for permission management are excellent."

"Microsoft Entra ID has streamlined and centralized our device management and threat response processes."

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

"The single sign-on feature is excellent."

"It's very easy to integrate with applications."

"The most valuable features of NetIQ Access Manager are SSO and Multi-Factor Authentication."

"There are lots of options to customize the solution to your needs."

"The features that we have found most valuable with NetIQ Access Manager are its single sign-on and two factor two second factor database."

Cons

"It could be better if a simple member could understand more easily the prices of the products and packages offered by Microsoft."

"Microsoft Entra ID's impact on access and identity management is relatively limited."

"Microsoft's biggest challenge is the documentation. The challenge lies in keeping documentation up-to-date due to rapid changes. Troubleshooting requires workarounds and research."

"Active Directory could always be more secure. Right now, we've got two-factor authentications. All services based on Active Directory have a username and password. If somebody hacked our username, they could easily get all the data from our side. So I want two-factor authentication and a stronger password policy from Active Directory. The domain controllers should be more secure as well."

"Private access and internet access should be available in a less expensive licensing model."

"Microsoft Entra ID can be improved by having more resources for learning how to best use the tool and understanding best use case scenarios."

"Microsoft plans to move away from SMS authentication for Multi-Factor Authentication and only implement application-based authenticator, which will be challenging for retail outlets reliant on Microsoft Active Directory."

"I think there is room for improvement with actually discussing, and advertising Microsoft as a an authenticator. Many people just get confused and use Google, and I think if Microsoft would make more of an effort to penetrate the market, that would be key."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

"Having the ability to easily extract and view and compare and version control configurations would be ideal."

"In terms of what could be improved, I would say the security of the infrastructure and the server and the working networking device."

"I would love to see the upgrade procedure handled more effectively. I would prefer to have OVS installation possibilities, although the upgrade procedures should include the OS as well. You should be able to use the whole application as an appliance."

"The application portal could be improved with more options and easier customization."

"Classification of junctions and new versions of applications, such as APIs, can be added to enable the use of more devices that utilize biometrics for Multi-Factor Authentication to improve the solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Most features of Entra ID are part of Microsoft's ecosystem and included in Microsoft 365 bundles, which means there are no additional costs associated with pricing and licensing."

"From a pricing standpoint, with all the services that we get, we are okay. I do not see a problem with the pricing structure. We are getting our money's worth."

"Microsoft is so expensive. You know it is expensive when a Fortune 100 company like ours is complaining about the cost. That has been a big thing for me. When I really want to use an Azure service, it is very hard for me to justify the cost, especially with Microsoft support."

"The pricing for Azure Active Directory is affordable; I would rate the cost a six out of ten."

"Make sure that you get the most out of your Office 365 licenses for Azure AD. If you have additional concerns for users who don't have an Office 365 license, consider Azure AD Premium P1 and P2. Be aware that you have to evaluate your license usage beforehand."

"If you are dealing with one supplier with an out-of-the-box solution, which provides you end-to-end capabilities, then it is naturally cheaper and less of a headache to manage and operate."

"I don't pay for it. Going by how I feel, I see the prices for any MFA solution going down because the more different alternatives there are, the cheaper things should be. Microsoft Authenticator app would be the preferred application, but there are too many ways to implement MFA. I don't know how much it cost, but the price should go down."

"The solution costs us 60,000 Rupees annually, just over $700, and there are no additional costs."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

"The price of the solution is average."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,491 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

29%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Government

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Active Directory?

It is very simple. The Active Directory functions are very easy for us. Its integration with anything is very easy. We can easily do third-party multifactor authentication.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

Regarding pricing, for the services we receive, it seems within the market range and about average.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 10% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 8% of the time

Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon Cognito vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

Okta Workforce Identity vs NetIQ Access Manager

Compared 44% of the time

More NetIQ Access Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

May 2025

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Buyer's Guide

NetIQ Access Manager vs. Symantec Siteminder

May 2025

Download NetIQ Access Manager product report

Also Known As

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

No data available

Interactive Demo

Microsoft

Demo not available

OpenText

Overview

Microsoft Entra ID is used for extending on-premises Active Directory to the cloud, managing application access, enabling multi-factor authentication, and single sign-on. It facilitates policy enforcement and secure access, ensuring centralized identity management across cloud and on-premises resources.

Organizations utilize Microsoft Entra ID for robust user and group management, identity synchronization, and conditional access. Its seamless integration with third-party apps, scalability, and support for remote work make it a preferred choice. The admin center streamlines identity and access tasks, enhancing efficiency and security with features like privileged identity management and audit logs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Single Sign-On: Simplifies user access to multiple applications with one login.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security by requiring additional verification.
Conditional Access: Establishes policies that determine how users' access cloud apps.
Integration: Easily integrates with various third-party applications.
User Identity Protection: Safeguards user identities from threats.
Privileged Identity Management: Manages elevated access to sensitive resources.
Audit Logs: Provides thorough activity logs for oversight and compliance.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Entra ID reviews?

Enhanced Security: Offers strong multifactor authentication and identity protection.
Administrative Efficiency: Simplifies identity and access management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growing user bases and remote work environments.
Integration Capabilities: Compatible with numerous third-party applications.
User-Friendly Interface: Makes managing user identities straightforward.

Microsoft Entra ID implementation varies across industries. Tech firms leverage it for secure, scalable access management, while healthcare organizations utilize its identity protection features to safeguard patient data. Educational institutions adopt Entra ID for streamlined user management and policy enforcement, ensuring secure access for students and staff across on-premises and cloud resources.

Microsoft

Access Manager provides a simple yet secure and scalable solution that can handle all your web access needs both internal as well as in the cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

Bancomext, Bouwend Nederland, Camera dei Deputati, CGT, Coopservice Group, Court of Appeals of Georgia, Etnic, European Automotive Manufacturer, FDM Document Dynamics, Hainan Province Information Center, Highland Community College, Huntington Bank, Johnsonville Sausage, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Mazars, Mexico's Tax Administration Service, Owens Community College, Pasco Risk, RDC, School District of Hartford, Senckenberg Nature Research Society, Sheetz, Spanish Public Employment Service, SUNY Orange County Community College, Swisscard, The Municipality of Siena, The University of Westminster, UMB Financial Corporation Invests in Identity Management, University of Dayton, University of Groningen, Vodacom, World Wide Technology

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. NetIQ Access Manager

April 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Entra ID vs. NetIQ Access Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Entra ID vs. NetIQ Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,491 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Entra ID vs. NetIQ Access Manager report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.