We compared Microsoft Configuration Manager and Microsoft Intune based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Microsoft Configuration Manager is praised for its efficient system management and robust security controls, while Microsoft Intune is highly valued for its device management capabilities and integration with broader enterprise systems. Users appreciate the flexibility in managing policies with Intune, while Configuration Manager users highlight its customizable reporting and remote access. Both products received positive feedback on customer service and support, with Configuration Manager offering competitive pricing and Intune demonstrating cost-effectiveness. Areas for improvement include enhancing user interfaces and improving software performance for both products.
Features: Microsoft Configuration Manager offers efficient system management, seamless software deployment, comprehensive inventory tracking, customizable reporting, robust security controls, and convenient remote access capabilities. Microsoft Intune provides the ability to wipe data and reset devices, excellent visibility into connected devices, integration with broader enterprise systems, control over user access to websites, and easy-to-use interfaces. Both products have their own strengths and valuable features.
Pricing and ROI: According to user feedback, both Microsoft Configuration Manager and Microsoft Intune offer reasonable pricing and flexible licensing options. Users find the setup process of Intune to be straightforward, while Configuration Manager is praised for its pricing structure and licensing terms., The ROI from Microsoft Configuration Manager was perceived as favorable based on user feedback. However, Microsoft Intune demonstrated positive ROI with effective cost management, increased productivity, secure device management, streamlined workflows, and seamless integration with existing systems. Users highlighted significant time savings, enhanced user experience, and improved security measures, making Microsoft Intune a valuable investment.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Configuration Manager could benefit from enhancing its user interface, navigation, and layout to streamline tasks. It should also improve reporting, alerting, integration with third-party apps, and device compatibility. On the other hand, users suggest that Microsoft Intune should focus on improving its user interface, speed, performance, customization options, and troubleshooting features.
Deployment and customer support: Based on user feedback, the duration required to establish a new tech solution with Microsoft Configuration Manager can vary widely. Some users spent three months on deployment, while others spent a week on setup. However, for Microsoft Intune, some users spent three months on deployment and an additional week on setup, while others spent a week in total for both phases., Microsoft Configuration Manager's customer service is highly praised for its helpfulness and responsiveness, while Microsoft Intune's support is commended for prompt assistance and knowledgeable staff. Both offer reliable and dependable support.
The summary above is based on 127 interviews we conducted recently with Microsoft Configuration Manager and Microsoft Intune users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"I like a lot of the reporting capabilities and baseline configurations."
"Microsoft Configuration Manager is integrated with other Microsoft products."
"I like Mircosoft's technical support. Microsoft has a few updates, like some of the critical KBs. They are published within the interval time, and in case of an escalation on the client missions, we will raise a ticket with the Microsoft team. They will create a hotfix or a critical update. They will chat with us, and that is one thing I like about Microsoft. Whenever any issues occur at my organization, they will help you out soon as possible within the SLA."
"The initial setup is fairly straightforward."
"Patching is the main feature because SCCM is made to control the entire environment without manually interpreting. So it is good to use for patching."
"Microsoft is being very competitive right now, and they are really investing in a lot of new features to be more competitive in the marketplace."
"SCCM is a stable solution."
"There is a faster time to rollout. If we get a new PC, it can be ready for productivity right away."
"I like that we can implement conditional access."
"The most valuable features are the ones that make sure that the deployment is of a standard operating system and the Zero Touch deployment, which is very useful. This allows users to have an out of box experience."
"The dashboards, the security, and the customization capabilities work very well for us."
"Stable product that's easy to set up compared to other MDM products."
"The technical support of Microsoft Intune is good."
"The main advantage is that Intune performs its intended functions effectively."
"Microsoft Endpoint Manager is not expensive overall, especially for small environments."
"While Microsoft Intune boasts a wide range of features, its user-friendliness and bundled licensing cost are key considerations for me."
"I would like to see more automation."
"Microsoft should extend support for additional platforms."
"The assets have reached their end-of-life, and patching them is a complex and laborious task. It would be highly advantageous if there were an integrated solution that provided distinct options for each end-of-life asset, streamlining the process and facilitating comprehension."
"There should probably be better remote support. They should also continue to improve on patch management, patching, and creating or turning products in software into deployable apps."
"The main thing is that SCCM has to become an appliance instead of a server. When I say appliance, it has to come preconfigured so that it is drop-shipped into the enterprise and then you activate the feature sets that you want. It should pull down all the latest binaries. Once that is all there, it should have a discovery tool which goes out and discovers the assets within an enterprise. If the server, workstation, and applications are all coming from the same vendor, why not have the vendor do this work for us and automate it as much as it possibly can?"
"In terms of scalability, I believe there's room for improvement. While SCCM is capable of handling our current needs effectively, scalability could be enhanced to accommodate future growth and larger deployments."
"It should provide the ability to remotely connect to mobile devices. There are some solutions that are doing that, but with Microsoft Intune, the only way to remotely connect to devices outside the organization and mobile devices is by using TeamViewer. It is pretty strange for a big company like Microsoft to not have something for that."
"The analysis is something that can be integrated. Their report analysis can be improved a little bit due to the fact that most of the time complaints policies are saved by the admins. It's something that we need to look into and search for."
"It would be beneficial to have a more straightforward understanding of Intune's capabilities, presented in a simplified manner."
"Its configuration is fairly complicated. You have to do quite a bit of discovery to be able to deploy it for a customer. You have to ask them a lot of questions. So, its initial deployment is the biggest challenge. They should make it easier to deploy with the use of Wizards or something else. During the deployment stage, there could be profiles for the customers who are particularly wanting to use certain feature sets of Intune."
"Microsoft Intune has a latency response time issue. The latency has room for improvement."
"In the next release, I would like a feature to be able to properly lock down the device. For example, if an attacker or somebody steals the phone, you can be sure that the pin cannot be broken."
"The feature that allows us to import the business application from the configuration manager to Intune is not very good at this time."
"While Intune works perfectly well, the only potential downside is that the deployment could be a bit complex for some users."
"I wanted to check if there is any provision at the Intune level to restrict certain things, such as a website, but unfortunately, that feature is available only in Microsoft Defender. Intune has web filtering capabilities, but they are only useful for protection from malicious websites, whereas we would like to be able to restrict a website. For example, YouTube is a clean website. No one would identify it as a malicious website, but if we want to stop the end-users from going to that website, we have to go for another product, such as Microsoft Defender or another third-party proxy solution. It would be great if this capability is included in Intune."
"They should make it easier to order it, however, that's generally true for everything from Microsoft."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 2nd in Configuration Management with 78 reviews while Microsoft Intune is ranked 3rd in Configuration Management with 163 reviews. Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2, while Microsoft Intune is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Intune writes "We can manage all aspects of our devices from a single console, easy to scale, and quick to deploy". Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, BigFix, Tanium and AWS Systems Manager, whereas Microsoft Intune is most compared with Jamf Pro, VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, SOTI MobiControl and Sophos Mobile. See our Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Microsoft Intune report.
See our list of best Configuration Management vendors.
We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
