"Software deployment and WSUS are most valuable."
"The most valuable features are application deployment and task-sequenced imaging."
"It's a stable product."
"The most valuable feature is the scalability."
"It uses detailed descriptions of the workstations, and that is good for me."
"This solution captures all the devices in our infrastructure."
"SCCM is a stable solution."
"It lets you know what your infrastructure is like and what state you are in."
"Microsoft Endpoint Manager is not expensive overall, especially for small environments."
"It works well if you have a Microsoft environment."
"The ability to integrate MDM would be great."
"The App to upgrades to the server needs to be improved."
"They should improve their anti-malware policies like the SCEP policies. For instance, you can't have different policies for different servers, there is only one policy in all the servers, and everything is covered under that. For example, say you want to scan one group of servers on Saturday, and then you want to scan another group of servers on Sunday, you can't do that. You have to scan all your servers, a regular scan or a full scan, on the same day and at the same time. That's definitely one thing they need to resolve. In the next release, it would actually be nice if they included Apple products. It will also help if you can use Intune again. Their compliance reporting feature could also be better. They can maybe work a bit on that for patching now. It would be better if SCCM came with the functions of Right Click Tools built-in. If SCCM would have all those functions already built-in, we won't have to go and spend $5,000, just as an add-in from another company to get those functions."
"Its client interface should be more accessible, and the notifications should be more customizable from the console. It should be more user friendly and have some kind of customized notifications so that we can use it on the client side. These are the reasons why we restricted its use only for the server environment and didn't use it on the client side."
"With Microsoft Premier Support, you get what you pay for. There's Third Tier Support that you pay for. If you pay for that, you get excellent support, and if you don't pay for that, then you get the less experienced staff."
"I currently need to increase my compliance level in the patching processes which this solution could improve on."
"SCCM does not scale well, which is one of the reasons we are not going to continue to use it."
"They need to improve the support for the Mac operating system."
"The solution requires Mac support."
"An issue we have run into with Microsoft Endpoint Manager is that we cannot patch third-party products like Adobe and Chrome with it."
More Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is ranked 1st in Configuration Management with 33 reviews while Microsoft Endpoint Manager is ranked 17th in Configuration Management with 2 reviews. Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Endpoint Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager writes "A stable systems management software product with useful package deployment and application deployment features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Endpoint Manager writes "Integrates well with other enterprise systems, is perfect for a Microsoft environment, and allows for increased usage". Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, BigFix, ManageEngine Desktop Central, Ivanti Patch for Windows and Quest KACE Systems Management, whereas Microsoft Endpoint Manager is most compared with AWS Systems Manager, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Microsoft Intune, Jamf Pro and ManageEngine Desktop Central. See our Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager vs. Microsoft Endpoint Manager report.
See our list of best Configuration Management vendors.
We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
