Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Microsoft Configuration Manager comparison

ManageEngine and Microsoft are both solutions in the Patch Management category. ManageEngine is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.2, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. ManageEngine holds a 7.3% mindshare in PM, compared to Microsoft’s 13.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of ManageEngine users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
ManageEngine Patch Manager ...
Read 16 ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus reviews
  • 1,760 Views
  • 753 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
Microsoft Configuration Man...
Read 81 Microsoft Configuration Manager reviews
  • 3,525 Views
  • 1,117 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Microsoft Configuration Manager and ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus compete in the patch management category. Microsoft Configuration Manager has an upper hand for larger enterprises due to its extensive integration capabilities, though ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus offers a cost-effective solution for smaller businesses.

Features: Microsoft Configuration Manager is known for its robust reporting tools, scalability for large environments, and integration with other Microsoft services. Additionally, it provides comprehensive patch management and efficient management of thousands of endpoints. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus offers user-friendly performance and effective patch management across diverse applications, integrating seamlessly with Windows and Linux systems. It also features automated patching and inventory management.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Configuration Manager could improve its handling of Linux environments, simplify documentation, and reduce setup complexity. It also faces challenges in integrating with non-Microsoft platforms and simplifying patch management. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus could enhance its reporting tools and user interface to be more intuitive, along with better support for end-user communications and more streamlined patch deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Configuration Manager offers multiple deployment modes, including on-premises and hybrid options, suitable for businesses with complex demands but can be challenging to configure. Customer service experiences vary, with professional and responsive support but sometimes slow in solving specific issues. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is simpler to deploy, commended for ease of setup and cloud deployment options, ideal for companies with less complicated infrastructures. Users still wish for improved technical support efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Configuration Manager has a relatively high cost due to its comprehensive features and enterprise-level capabilities, with expensive licensing for larger organizations, though it integrates well within Microsoft's ecosystem. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus offers a more affordable pricing structure with a straightforward licensing model, preferred by users seeking a cost-effective solution without sacrificing essential patch management features. Both products report positive ROI, with increased efficiency and reduced operational costs.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,545 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine Patch Manager ...
Ranking in Patch Management
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Configuration Man...
Ranking in Patch Management
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (7th), Configuration Management (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is 7.3%, down from 8.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Configuration Manager is 13.9%, down from 17.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

AdeolaEkunola - PeerSpot reviewer
A quite straightforward solution that works easily with different operating systems
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten. When the use of the solution for customers grows, there is a need for more endpoints, and it may grow up to 500 endpoints, and the solution's use may even be scaled up further. It is possible to do what is needed to scale up the solution for the IT environments of any of our company's customers. Before scaling up, one needs to buy the license and consider the IT architecture to see if there are any modifications required in the solution. Around three of my company's customers who manage enterprise-sized businesses with a minimum requirement of 700 endpoints at least use the solution.
Read full review
MikeNelson2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Deployment recovery works well but requires configuration improvements
While I do not use the product frequently, many issues were due to configuration rather than the product itself. I cannot give an exact recommendation as it is not my area of responsibility. The team that uses it finds it adequate. It is presently good enough for us not to investigate other options. Overall, I rate the product a six out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is centralized management."
"I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten."
"You can create remote sessions for client systems."
"ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is lightweight and has a remote push feature that helps me manage several main sites and subsites."
"The automated patch deployment feature is really helpful. I can schedule it anytime, even on weekends, without needing to restart systems. The centralized management and unified console are great. It shows me which PCs are out of date or which users are breaching our policies. I can test patches before deploying them."
"The ability to deploy patches seamlessly is the solution's most valuable aspect. It allows us to not only deploy patches but to monitor the deployment of those patches."
"It is a highly stable solution."
More ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus pros
"Automation of operating system, application, and update deployments massively reduces IT operations effort."
"We have found the scalability to be quite good."
"The ability to make collections and deploy to them has been great."
"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is valuable in keeping our systems updated. We are able to send updates to all the systems. Additionally, the Intune integration is helpful."
"The scalability to deploy the package."
"Microsoft Configuration Manager is integrated with other Microsoft products."
"This has made the management of our environment easier."
"The technical support is good."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager pros
 

Cons

"The commercial aspect of ManageEngine is challenging due to their lack of presence in Brazil, which makes obtaining proposals difficult."
"Patching over the Internet should be improved."
"The user interface of ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus needs to be made more user-friendly, simplified, and less complicated."
"The only area for improvement in ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, which I noticed, is the reporting."
"There are limitations to this solution when we are working with iOS, Apple laptops or desktops such as the Mac and iMac."
"They should add better features for managing hardware."
"The solution should have a customer label where we can label those servers or include those servers for specific customers."
"The tool's support needs improvement."
More ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus cons
"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager can improve by allowing us to schedule the scripts, we don't have a script scheduling option and have to do it manually."
"The solution should be more compatible with different versions of Linux."
"Built in PowerShell cmdlets would be a nice feature because managing clients remotely can be a pain without knowing the WMI calls to run."
"There is a reboot issue with the patching. Sometimes, if patching runs into any issue whatsoever, it doesn't reboot but it doesn't tell you it errored out. It just sits there and we don't find out until the next day whether it patched or not. That was a big issue for us. We're working through that. They added some stuff in there now where you can actually tell reboot is pending. But we still need some kind of notification that if something fails or is pending, we know. We shouldn't have to go in and look. They don't have anything for that right now."
"It should provide the ability to remotely connect to mobile devices. There are some solutions that are doing that, but with Microsoft Intune, the only way to remotely connect to devices outside the organization and mobile devices is by using TeamViewer. It is pretty strange for a big company like Microsoft to not have something for that."
"The operations could be faster and you need some patience with this tool."
"The tool's deployment is complex and depends on the architecture you want to implement."
"The database should be made to be more stable and robust, but not so much the configuration."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this product is reasonable."
"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and the charge for support is extra."
"I rate the price of the product a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"Patch Manager is cost-effective."
"The pricing for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is on the moderate side."
"Its price needs improvement."
"The solution cost is around $5,000 per year."
"ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is a little bit cheaper."
More ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus pricing and cost advice
"When you compare this solution with other tools in the market you might actually find a lot of variation in the pricing and that's why people opt for the other tools rather than Microsoft tools."
"The price of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is expensive."
"Overall, I think it's fine. It's pretty much in-line because there are ways to offset it with the Office 365 licensing."
"Along with buying a license for MECM, we also have to buy a service called CMG (Cloud Management Gateway) which is a virtual machine in the cloud with which you can link your MECM to the Azure tenant so as to manage teleworkers."
"SCCM comes with its own version of SQL Server. If you use that SQL Server with SCCM and don't use it for another applications than you get an SQL Server for free."
"Microsoft provides a steep price for their enterprise products, but they offer very competitive pricing for their legacy customers."
"The solution is expensive. Microsoft Configuration Manager would likely be considered high-priced for small businesses because they may not fully utilize all of its features and capabilities."
"The license price could be reduced for Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager They should make the price more affordable for smaller companies, most companies would be able to use the solution if it was priced better. There are more people on this cloud because you don't have to have either a server room or an on-premise server. You can have one IT person handle this without any local infrastructure."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,545 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?
The fetch repository is a good feature.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?
The pricing for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is reasonable. There is a concern regarding the exchange rate as one dollar equals six reais today, making everything expensive in dollars for us.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?
Patching over the Internet should be improved. If I am traveling, I should have an Internet patching option for control, visibility, and vulnerability management for roaming users. Additionally, in...
See all answers
How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...
See all answers
How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?
ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...
See all answers
What do you like most about SCCM?
One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Logo
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Compared 18% of the time
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Logo
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Compared 15% of the time
BigFix vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Logo
BigFix vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Compared 12% of the time
GFI LanGuard vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Logo
GFI LanGuard vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Compared 7% of the time
Qualys Patch Management vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Logo
Qualys Patch Management vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Compared 5% of the time
More ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Competitors
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 13% of the time
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 12% of the time
Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 8% of the time
BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 5% of the time
NinjaOne vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
NinjaOne vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 3% of the time
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
June 2025
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus reportDownload ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Configuration Manager
June 2025
Microsoft Configuration Manager reportDownload Microsoft Configuration Manager product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM )
 

Overview

Patch Manager Plus is a simple patch management tool that makes it easy to keep your network patched and secure. It is an endpoint patch management software that provides enterprises a single interface for automating all patch management tasks - from detecting missing patches to deploying patches - for Windows, Mac, Linux and 250+ third-party applications. Whether you have one computer or hundred, they can all be patched at the same time from a single point of console.

ManageEngine

Microsoft Configuration Manager helps IT manage PCs and servers, keeping software up-to-date, setting configuration and security policies, and monitoring system status while giving employees access to corporate applications on the devices that they choose. When Configuration Manager is integrated with Microsoft Intune, you can manage corporate-connected PCs and Macs along with cloud-based mobile devices running Windows, iOS, and Android, all from a single management console.

New features of Configuration Manager, such as the support of Windows 10 in-place upgrade, co-management with Microsoft Intune, Windows 10 and Microsoft 365 Apps for enterprise Servicing Dashboard, integration with Windows Update for Business, and more make deploying and managing Windows easier than ever before.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

IKEA Honda UNICEF The University of Georgia Evander
Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad
Buyer's Guide
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager
June 2025
Free Report: ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager
Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,545 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.