No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Microsoft Azure vs Stratoscale [EOL] comparison

Microsoft and Stratoscale are both solutions in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Stratoscale users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Azure
Read 324 Microsoft Azure reviews
  • 39,306 Views
  • 22,797 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
Stratoscale [EOL]
Read 3 Stratoscale [EOL] reviews
    100% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive Summary
    We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure and Stratoscale [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS).

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) Report (Updated: August 2026).
    Buyer's Guide
    Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
    August 2026
    Download the complete report
    Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Microsoft Azure
    Average Rating
    8.4
    Reviews Sentiment
    6.9
    Number of Reviews
    324
    Ranking in other categories
    Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (1st), PaaS Clouds (1st)
    Stratoscale [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.6
    Number of Reviews
    3
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    Syed Abid - PeerSpot reviewer
    Syed Abid
    Snr. Infrastructure Architect (Data Centre) at LogicEra
    Versatile integrations and reliable customer satisfaction elevate cloud service experience
    For Microsoft Azure improvement, they need to enhance their support system. The first level of support should be improved in terms of quality and response time. They need more technical support at the first level, as there are currently only one or two technical people among five to ten staff members at this level. They should ensure that the first level support is more technical because we normally provide services to technical users ourselves. When an issue arises, it usually escalates to the second or third level. When facing first level support, they may have limited knowledge and only collect screenshots to forward to their seniors. They should ensure that the first level support is aligned with L2 and L3 to better assist us, especially since we mention in the ticket that our issues are related to specific problems and require that sort of support.
    Read full review
    RB
    Robert Bush
    Server and Storage Platform Team Lead at Invesco US
    I like the automation and self-healing features
    SDDC. Speed to market. Automation and self-healing. Oracle engine. Google and Azure API. Still implementing.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "The most valuable features are the interface and customizability."
    "For me and many other people, the general view is that Azure is very stable."
    "My experience with technical support so far is very good."
    "The main benefit of Microsoft Azure is that it is cloud-based; we are using Microsoft Visual Studio for our code and it is tightly integrated with Microsoft Azure, and additionally, the solution is user-friendly."
    "The most valuable feature of this solution is the integration between all of the components in Azure."
    "The time to market is fast compared back to the traditional on-premise hosting, which is one of the better things I can say because there is no need to worry, as the Pack services will enable it to start immediately."
    "The product scales extremely well."
    "The initial setup is straightforward and the deployment can be completed within short time, and now we can deploy most components and services within a day or two."
    More Microsoft Azure pros
    "We hired a third company to stress test the system and it was above and beyond in terms of what we expected."
    "We efficiently move resources between major engineering projects."
    "Automation and self-healing."
     

    Cons

    "The system has some limitations on resource use, such as number of cores, max transactions, I/O, maximum number of VMs etc. These limits make some things very difficult, and could be improved."
    "It can be cheaper, which might simplify things a bit."
    "I would like to see it more easily accessible."
    "The security of the solution could always be much better."
    "I would like to see Internet content filtering included."
    "The cost is quite high."
    "The initial setup can be improved."
    "The technical support of Microsoft is okay. However, there were times we had to speak to them in the US time zone which was not convenient."
    More Microsoft Azure cons
    "Oracle engine. Google and Azure API."
    "Initial setup was complex at the beginning as the system was still lacking some important features, while every new release required a full reinstallation."
    "We never had an issue with stability, but when we implemented the product, there were certain places where we weren't sure that they are completely aligned with our goals, in terms of how we use the system to get there."
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "All cloud services are expensive."
    "We pay yearly for the license."
    "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
    "We are on an annual subscription. However, there are other options available."
    "The price of the solution could be cheaper."
    "The pricing of the solution could be reduced. We are not able to create a free account in my country."
    "Its price should be optimized so that we can use more features."
    "I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."
    More Microsoft Azure pricing and cost advice
    Information not available
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Comparison Review

    it_user8586 - PeerSpot reviewer
    it_user8586
    Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees
    Aug 14, 2013
    Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison
    Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…
    Read full review
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Manufacturing Company
    11%
    Financial Services Firm
    10%
    Construction Company
    8%
    Outsourcing Company
    7%
    No data available
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business141
    Midsize Enterprise54
    Large Enterprise153
    No data available
     

    Questions from the Community

    Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?
    IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...
    See all answers
    Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?
    One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...
    See all answers
    How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?
    I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    Google Firebase vs Microsoft Azure Logo
    Google Firebase vs Microsoft Azure
    Compared 11% of the time
    Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure Logo
    Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure
    Compared 7% of the time
    Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Microsoft Azure Logo
    Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Microsoft Azure
    Compared 6% of the time
    Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure Logo
    Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure
    Compared 6% of the time
    Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure Logo
    Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure
    Compared 5% of the time
    More Microsoft Azure Competitors
    Alibaba Cloud vs Stratoscale [EOL] Logo
    Alibaba Cloud vs Stratoscale [EOL]
    Compared 12% of the time
    VMware Software Defined Data Center vs Stratoscale [EOL] Logo
    VMware Software Defined Data Center vs Stratoscale [EOL]
    Compared 12% of the time
    Google Firebase vs Stratoscale [EOL] Logo
    Google Firebase vs Stratoscale [EOL]
    Compared 12% of the time
    Amazon AWS vs Stratoscale [EOL] Logo
    Amazon AWS vs Stratoscale [EOL]
    Compared 7% of the time
    Scale Computing Platform vs Stratoscale [EOL] Logo
    Scale Computing Platform vs Stratoscale [EOL]
    Compared 5% of the time
    More Stratoscale [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Azure
    July 2026
    Microsoft Azure reportDownload Microsoft Azure product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
    August 2026
    Stratoscale [EOL] reportDownload Stratoscale [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure
    No data available
     

    Overview

    Microsoft Azure is a versatile cloud platform known for its scalability, flexibility, and ease of use, offering comprehensive solutions like virtual machines, identity management, and data storage with robust security measures and global data centers.

    Azure provides a straightforward setup with dynamic scaling and seamless integration with existing tools. Its robust security, compliance with privacy laws, and global data center presence make it a trusted choice for enterprises. With features supporting DevOps, IoT, AI/ML, and hybrid cloud environments, Azure facilitates efficient cloud migration and modernization, enhancing operational efficiency.

    What are some of the key features of Microsoft Azure?
    • Scalability: Adjust resources automatically to meet demand.
    • Flexibility: Support for hybrid cloud setup and smooth integration with existing tools.
    • Virtual Machines: Extensive support for VMs to run various workloads.
    • Active Directory: Robust identity and access management services.
    • Data Storage: Diverse storage options for different data management needs.
    • Security Measures: Comprehensive security protocols and compliance support.
    What benefits and ROI should users consider when evaluating Microsoft Azure?
    • Cost Efficiency: Managed services that reduce operational costs.
    • Reliability: High availability with global data center coverage.
    • Ease of Migration: Facilitates transition from on-premises solutions to the cloud.
    • Operational Efficiency: User-friendly interface and extensive training resources.

    Organizations primarily use Azure for infrastructure services, application hosting, and data management across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. Resellers deploy cloud services for clients in private, public, and hybrid clouds, supporting enterprise applications and digital transformation projects.

    Microsoft
    Stratoscale is the cloud infrastructure company, allowing enterprises to deploy an AWS-compatible region in any data center. Stratoscale Symphony, can be deployed in minutes on commodity x86 servers, creating an Amazon Web Services (AWS) compatible region and offering AWS-compatible services including EC2, S3, EBS, RDS and Kubernetes. Stratoscale was named a “Cool Vendor in Servers and Virtualization” by Gartner and raised over $70M from leading investors including: Battery Ventures, Bessemer Venture Partners, Cisco, Intel, Qualcomm Ventures, SanDisk and Leslie Ventures.
    Stratoscale
     

    Sample Customers

    BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.
    SanDisk, Orange, Merck, NTT, Troy Cable, Bezeq, Tieto, Neen, Ofek Cloud Technologies, APA IT, Netkom, SOS Surveillance, Futong, WeBank, Team Netsol
    Buyer's Guide
    Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
    August 2026
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS). Updated: August 2026.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.

    We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.