• Home
  • Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs. Wikidi Testomato

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs Wikidi Testomato comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] and Wikidi Testomato based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night.
We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night.
Use Wikidi Testomato?
Ranking
Unranked
In Functional Testing Tools
44th
out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
Views
82
Comparisons
66
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Service Test, HPE Service Test
Testomato
Learn More
OpenText
Wikidi
Video Not Available
Overview

Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

Wikidi Testomato monitors your website for problems that make your business vulnerable. It has Easy-to-read reports that tracks site performance to identify error patterns and prevent future issues, Instant Alerts that runs website checks every 5 minutes and monitors uptime performance every 15 seconds reducing time-to-resolution and Quick Setup that starts running checks in seconds to verify your website is working.
Sample Customers
John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank
Jollibee, Wingmen Online Marketing GmbH, Kaymu, Dixi, Toi Toi
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while Wikidi Testomato is ranked 44th in Functional Testing Tools. Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is rated 7.6, while Wikidi Testomato is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] writes "We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night". On the other hand, Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Wikidi Testomato is most compared with .

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.