No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs Wikidi Testomato comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
1.0
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Wikidi Testomato
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (41st)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user375834 - PeerSpot reviewer
VRM - Venue Results Manager at a sports company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It made it easy for the test team to monitor and measure test execution​.
The most valuable features for us are Performance on execution Usage, once most of tasks are drag and drop, so you just need to drag the features during script preparation Integration with other ALM tools My team integrated test scripts from HP Service Test into HP QC ALM test management tool.…
Use Wikidi Testomato?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
899,645 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
No data available
 

Also Known As

Service Test, HPE Service Test
Testomato
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank
Jollibee, Wingmen Online Marketing GmbH, Kaymu, Dixi, Toi Toi
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, OpenText and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: May 2026.
899,645 professionals have used our research since 2012.