Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs Wikidi Testomato comparison

OpenText and Wikidi are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.
Wikidi Testomato
  • 66 Views
  • 22 Comparison Views
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] and Wikidi Testomato based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, UiPath and others in Functional Testing Tools.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: May 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
May 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,957 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Wikidi Testomato
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (44th)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user375834 - PeerSpot reviewer
It made it easy for the test team to monitor and measure test execution​.
The most valuable features for us are Performance on execution Usage, once most of tasks are drag and drop, so you just need to drag the features during script preparation Integration with other ALM tools My team integrated test scripts from HP Service Test into HP QC ALM test management tool.…
Read full review
Use Wikidi Testomato?
Share your opinion
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,957 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

TestingWhiz vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Logo
TestingWhiz vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]
Compared 100% of the time
More Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
May 2025
Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] reportDownload Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
May 2025
Wikidi Testomato reportDownload Wikidi Testomato product report
 

Also Known As

Service Test, HPE Service Test
Testomato
 

Overview

Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

OpenText
Wikidi Testomato monitors your website for problems that make your business vulnerable. It has Easy-to-read reports that tracks site performance to identify error patterns and prevent future issues, Instant Alerts that runs website checks every 5 minutes and monitors uptime performance every 15 seconds reducing time-to-resolution and Quick Setup that starts running checks in seconds to verify your website is working.
Wikidi
 

Sample Customers

John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank
Jollibee, Wingmen Online Marketing GmbH, Kaymu, Dixi, Toi Toi
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
May 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, UiPath and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: May 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,957 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.