"Very easy to implement."
"The technical support is good at resolving issues."
"The reporting feature is good for us."
"The most useful feature of this solution is tracking. When the application's traffic has been monitored it is taken from that particular application and analyzed. It is then given a live session of that particular user. For example, if you are using your bank application to do some kind of transaction, everything that you do can be tracked by that application."
"The stability of the Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is good."
"VM monitoring is pretty good showing good visualizations of how VMs are operating within the context of all the VMs running on the same hypervisor."
"Infrastructure monitoring is the most valuable feature."
"Everybody is moving away from traffic and installing agents on the application to do the job, but Micro Focus is using traditional ways to collect the traffic. They should change their architecture completely."
"When we want to monitor our encrypted traffic, this product doesn't work because our cipher is not supported."
"Some issues with login errors."
"This technology is considered to be older."
"I would be very interested in having transaction traceability included in the product, to give us a better view of what is really going wrong in a particular method and action."
"The lack of an agent means that remote monitoring requires multiple firewall ports to be opened."
"Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope could improve by adding more features, such as cloud, APM, and DevOps monitoring."
More Micro Focus Real User Monitor Pricing and Cost Advice →
Micro Focus Real User Monitor is ranked 28th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 4 reviews while Micro Focus SiteScope is ranked 41st in Application Performance Management (APM) with 3 reviews. Micro Focus Real User Monitor is rated 5.8, while Micro Focus SiteScope is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Real User Monitor writes "An expensive product with an old design that needs to be more lightweight". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus SiteScope writes "Offers agentless monitoring, is easy to configure and reduces downtime". Micro Focus Real User Monitor is most compared with AppDynamics, Google Stackdriver, Dynatrace, Datadog and VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront, whereas Micro Focus SiteScope is most compared with Dynatrace, Splunk, AppDynamics, SCOM and Broadcom DX Application Performance Management. See our Micro Focus Real User Monitor vs. Micro Focus SiteScope report.
See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.