Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText DevPartner comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Application Qualit...
Ranking in Test Management Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
209
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (4th), Quality Management Software (1st)
OpenText DevPartner
Ranking in Test Management Tools
27th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Application Quality Management is 9.0%, down from 12.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText DevPartner is 1.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Application Quality Management9.0%
OpenText DevPartner1.3%
Other89.7%
Test Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

BRIANJOHNSON2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Independant Consultant at Reckitt
Test management has standardized our programs but reporting remains manual and time consuming
Test management helps to streamline the quality assurance process through the process I put in place on how to use the tool. The tool is just a conduit. It is the process that I put in place that the team follows that drives the testing in the tool. Regarding real-time tracking and reporting and how it helps enhance project management within my organization, the reporting is still awful. We normally do a lot of manual reporting. It always has been awful and always will be awful until they actually bolt on a reporting tool that I can quickly pull out. It is not there, and it is awful. The reporting part is definitely something to improve.
Use OpenText DevPartner?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
881,036 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Performing Arts
9%
Government
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business39
Midsize Enterprise32
Large Enterprise162
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlen...
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
People are using OpenText ALM _ Quality Center for recording user cases, testing and hand documentation, defect tracking, business purposes, and reporting.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Quality Manager
Micro Focus DevPartner, DevPartner
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)
InSightec Ltd, Synergex
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: January 2026.
881,036 professionals have used our research since 2012.