Mezmo vs Nagios Log Server comparison

Mezmo and Nagios are both solutions in the Log Management category. Mezmo is ranked #50, while Nagios is ranked #46. Mezmo holds a 0.3% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Nagios’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Mezmo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nagios users who would recommend it.

Mezmo

Read 2 Mezmo reviews

673 Views
444 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nagios Log Server

Read 4 Nagios Log Server reviews

1,180 Views
1,180 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Mezmo

Nagios Log Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Mezmo and Nagios Log Server are key competitors in log management solutions. Mezmo seems to have the upper hand in pricing and support based on user feedback, whereas Nagios Log Server is favored for its comprehensive features.

Features: Mezmo offers integration capabilities, streamlining data management across applications. Its quick setup and responsive customer service further enhance its functionality. Additionally, users highlight its user-friendly interface. Nagios Log Server provides a robust alerting system and scalability that cater to diverse environments. Its comprehensive monitoring features and adaptability are crucial for various business needs. Users appreciate its extensive feature set, providing flexibility and scalability.

Room for Improvement: Mezmo could enhance its data visualization for better clarity. Users suggest improvements in its reporting features and seek more robust analytics tools. Nagios Log Server would benefit from a more intuitive configuration process. Users advocate for simpler user management features and better data management interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mezmo's quick setup and responsive support make deployment easier, facilitating a smoother transition. Nagios Log Server is also easy to deploy but requires initial configuration efforts. Both offer supportive customer service that aids the deployment journey effectively.

Pricing and ROI: Mezmo is noted for its cost-effectiveness, providing a good ROI for smaller teams or businesses on a budget. Users consider Nagios Log Server to provide satisfactory ROI due to its extensive features, justifying the initial higher cost for broader use cases.

To learn more, read our detailed Mezmo vs. Nagios Log Server Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Mezmo vs. Nagios Log Server

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Mezmo

Ranking in Log Management

50th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (75th), Observability Pipeline Software (7th)

Nagios Log Server

Ranking in Log Management

46th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Mezmo is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nagios Log Server is 0.8%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Nagios Log Server	0.8%
Mezmo	0.3%
Other	98.9%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Theodore Omtzigt

President and Founder at STILLWATER SUPERCOMPUTING INC

It consolidates all logs into one place and provides required features and functionalities

Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to do RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue.

Read full review

Syarul Idzuddin Adzmi

Operation Director at Digital Pulse Sdn Bhd

A scalable and affordable tool for monitoring data centers

Five engineers are needed for the maintenance of the product. I would definitely recommend the solution to those planning to use it. To increase the rating for the product, Nagios should offer remote support and offer more customization in reporting while making it easy for the customers to use it. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."

"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."

"The product is scalable."

"One of the most valuable features is the dashboard because the UI was effective and easy to use. The alert systems are good as well. We had no failovers and had high availability. We can search the queries fast as well in Nagios Log Server."

"The initial setup of Nagios Log Server was easy and straightforward."

"A great feature of the solution involves its internal portal."

Cons

"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."

"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."

"The configurations during initial setup could be improved. If they could be agentless, as in the case of the Ansible product, it would be better. I would like to be able to analyze the network bandwidth."

"The support could be better."

"The customization and dashboards have shortcomings and need to be improved to make the tool look more presentable."

"As we are talking about a product which is open to the public, the pricing makes it challenging for us to profit off of its marketing."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"For a single instance, the price is around $4,000."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap, I rate the pricing an eight or nine."

"We found the pricing to be quite affordable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Datadog vs Mezmo

Compared 41% of the time

Cribl vs Mezmo

Compared 37% of the time

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs Mezmo

Compared 22% of the time

More Mezmo Competitors

Wazuh vs Nagios Log Server

Compared 51% of the time

Graylog Enterprise vs Nagios Log Server

Compared 15% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Nagios Log Server

Compared 13% of the time

SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server vs Nagios Log Server

Compared 5% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Logs vs Nagios Log Server

Compared 5% of the time

More Nagios Log Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Mezmo

September 2025

Download Mezmo product report

Buyer's Guide

Nagios Log Server

September 2025

Download Nagios Log Server product report

Also Known As

LogDNA

No data available

Overview

Today’s enterprises must manage a massive amount of machine data. They require a platform that enables engineering teams to deliberately route and store structured and unstructured data for different teams with unique use cases. Legacy platforms weren’t made for this moment.
‍
Mezmo, formerly LogDNA, lets organizations ingest, process, route, analyze, and store all of their log data. Purpose-built for modern engineering teams—including developers, SREs, IT Operations, and Security Engineers—the Mezmo platform is trusted by thousands of companies for SaaS, cloud, and hybrid applications.

Mezmo

Nagios Enterprises delivers official products, services, and solutions for and around Nagios – the industry standard in enterprise-grade IT infrastructure monitoring. With millions of users worldwide, Nagios is the undisputed champion in the IT monitoring space. Our team of dedicated professionals works to ensure total customer satisfaction with all the services we provide. Our extensive network of partners helps extend Nagios services and solutions to new organizations and markets worldwide to meet a variety of business needs. Nagios Enterprises was founded in 2007 by Ethan Galstad. Ethan created what would later become known as Nagios in 1999, and currently serves as the President of Nagios Enterprises.

Nagios

Sample Customers

Instacart, Asics, Lime, Salesforce

IBM, impulse, wipro, comteco

Buyer's Guide

Mezmo vs. Nagios Log Server

September 2025

Free Report: Mezmo vs. Nagios Log Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Mezmo vs. Nagios Log Server and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Mezmo vs. Nagios Log Server report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.