• Home
  • MetricStream vs. NAVEX Global

MetricStream vs NAVEX Global comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
MetricStream Logo
MetricStream
Read 2 MetricStream reviews
1,631 views|684 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
NAVEX Logo
NAVEX Global
Read 10 NAVEX Global reviews
539 views|387 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
MetricStream vs. NAVEX Global
May 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between MetricStream and NAVEX Global based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two GRC solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed MetricStream vs. NAVEX Global Report (Updated: May 2024).
Download the complete report
769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
AdhishP
Reasonably priced, stable, with out of the box deployment, and has good local support
Anonymous User
Enables employees to make hotline complaints anonymously.
This solution gives an opportunity for anonymous hotline complaints. Before the solution, the complaints came directly to the internal audit, and... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "They are flexible in terms of customers' needs."

    • More MetricStream Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Questions from the Community
    What advice do you have for others considering MetricStream?
    Top Answer:There are 3 industry leading GRC software and they are IBM OpenPages, MetricStream and RSA Archer. In the areas of Operational Risk, Regulatory Management, Policy Management, Operational Resilience… more »
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What are the pros and cons of Fusion Risk Management and MetricStream Op ...
    Top Answer:Here are some of the pros and cons of Fusion Risk Management and MetricStream for Operational Resilience and Business Continuity Fusion Risk Management Pros: Fusion Risk Management is an… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    12th
    out of 86 in GRC
    Views
    1,631
    Comparisons
    684
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    17th
    out of 86 in GRC
    Views
    539
    Comparisons
    387
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    MetricStream vs. NAVEX Global
    May 2024
    Free Report: MetricStream vs. NAVEX Global
    Find out what your peers are saying about MetricStream vs. NAVEX Global and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    MetricStream
    NAVEX
    Overview
    Provides advanced capabilities such as risk calculators and risk heat maps for risk analysis and monitoring.

    NAVEX Global’s integrated suite of proven ethics and compliance software, training and services equips organizations to identify and contain compliance risks and threats. Whether you need one solution or our full suite, our flexible, scalable solutions make ethics and compliance programs more effective—and easier to manage and measure.

    More than 12,500 clients—including 95 of the Fortune 100—around the world trust us to power their ethics & compliance programs.

    Top 10 Ethics & Compliance Predictions & Recommendations for 2016

    Training: NAVEX Engage Online Compliance Training Video, Course Library

    Visit: Navexglobal.com

    Sample Customers
    Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago, ACCO Brands Corporation, AgFirst Farm Credit Bank, AIB International, Associated Banc-Corp, BAE Systems, Barclaycard, Dell Inc, DIRECTV, Energizer, Fresenius Kabi, Hasbro, Goodyear, HudsonCity Savings Bank, Infigen Energy, Kaydon, Leroy Merlin, Mountry Financial Corp., Nicholas Piramal, Pepco, Pfizer, Societe Generale, Whitney Bank
    Toyota, Delta, Cedars-Sinai, Coca-Cola, Equifax, Cisco, Yahoo!, Jamba Juice, Fairmont Hotels & Resorts, Auburn University, NEC, Fleet Laboratories, AVAYA, Del Taco, Valero, OCWEN, Samaritan Health Services, Levi Strauss & Co, Telus
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization25%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Energy/Utilities Company4%
    REVIEWERS
    Healthcare Company38%
    University25%
    Performing Arts13%
    Non Profit13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise32%
    Large Enterprise52%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    MetricStream vs. NAVEX Global
    May 2024
    Free Report: MetricStream vs. NAVEX Global
    Find out what your peers are saying about MetricStream vs. NAVEX Global and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    MetricStream is ranked 12th in GRC while NAVEX Global is ranked 17th in GRC. MetricStream is rated 8.6, while NAVEX Global is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of MetricStream writes "Reasonably priced, stable, with out of the box deployment, and has good local support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NAVEX Global writes "Enables employees to make hotline complaints anonymously". MetricStream is most compared with RSA Archer, IBM OpenPages and OneTrust GRC, whereas NAVEX Global is most compared with Convercent, RSA Archer and SAI360. See our MetricStream vs. NAVEX Global report.

    See our list of best GRC vendors.

    We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.