We performed a comparison between Meraki MS Switches and MikroTik Cloud Router Switch based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Ethernet Switches solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The technical support is very good. They offer some of the best support on the market."
"It helps manage multiple switches deployed in different locations with a single console on the cloud."
"The dashboard and the interface, in general, are good features."
"I like that I can patch and manage them remotely from the user portal."
"The most valuable features are the cloud management, the monitoring, and the visibility available on the report's facts on the cloud controller."
"Support has been very good."
"The switch supports various automation testing tools, and it's quite helpful for network troubleshooting as well."
"Setting up a Meraki switch is fairly simple. It can be done by one manager and a senior engineer developer."
"The GUI is easy to use."
"The interface management and the user access management is pretty good."
"The initial setup is easy."
"There are a lot of features to control permitting or stopping packets in the network."
"It is user-friendly, reliable, and cheap."
"The most valuable feature is that it has better throughput than its competitors."
"Some of the most valuable features are the simplicity, cost, usability, and power. As a package, it's extremely effective."
"The beauty of MikroTik is that you have flexibility with the routing parts."
"Better alerting capabilities are needed because they do not provide enough notification or detail about events."
"The solution does not fit all use cases."
"In this solution, you are lacking a feature that Cisco Classic has that allows you to save your configuration with a serial cable."
"The licensing model needs to be improved."
"The stability of the solution isn't ideal. We've had a lot of problems with the switches. They are unstable and unreliable. We need to reboot them often."
"Management from a single dashboard is what I want to see from Meraki MS Switches."
"The pricing can be made cheaper."
"The pricing can be made cheaper."
"Improvements are needed with respect to some of the security, especially for VPN links between vendors other than Cisco."
"The solution does not yet offer a SaaS version."
"The user interface could improve and they should allow a license for IBS."
"Stuff that I'd like to be improved is really just training and documentation because I think the feature set is full. Another improvement I'd suggest is that their new, bigger releases should be a bit more stable."
"It would be even better with a centralized management platform."
"If MikroTik had a marketing team and support team in India then it would be much easier for us to get the product, as well as support."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The port isolation and VLAN need to be improved."
Meraki MS Switches is ranked 5th in Ethernet Switches with 87 reviews while MikroTik Cloud Router Switch is ranked 14th in Ethernet Switches with 17 reviews. Meraki MS Switches is rated 8.4, while MikroTik Cloud Router Switch is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Meraki MS Switches writes "They're not expensive and configuration is very easy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MikroTik Cloud Router Switch writes "Easy to set up, user-friendly, and reliable". Meraki MS Switches is most compared with Aruba Switches, Cisco Ethernet Switches, Ubiquiti UniFi Switches, Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access and Fortinet FortiSwitch - Data Center, whereas MikroTik Cloud Router Switch is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Netgate TNSR, Huawei Enterprise Routers, Cisco Enterprise Routers and Arista Networks Platform. See our Meraki MS Switches vs. MikroTik Cloud Router Switch report.
See our list of best Ethernet Switches vendors.
We monitor all Ethernet Switches reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.