McAfee Web Protection [EOL] vs Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between McAfee Web Protection [EOL] and Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, TitanHQ and others in Internet Security.
To learn more, read our detailed Internet Security Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's a solution that permits making a granular configuration and it is easier to deploy the same configuration on a lot of devices using the central console. It is the master of the product.""Provides good accessibility and handles any overload very well.""The solution is not too expensive. It's affordable.""The solution does what it's meant to do.""The most valuable is the blocking of blacklisted sites, a URL that is, either by intelligence or by McAfee, detected as a malicious site.""The product is quite an effective firewall.""It is functional. It has reduced risk and downtime while also ensuring regulatory compliance, which is critical.""The most valuable feature is the ease in the configuration for security roles."

More McAfee Web Protection [EOL] Pros →

"Menlo Security RBI's best feature is its threat isolation engine."

More Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation Pros →

Cons
"The configuration could be simplified because it is more complex to make the configuration on McAfee. What can be improved is the support of the agent on smartphones, IOS or Android. That still now is not available yet.""Lacking filter for spam.""The initial setup could be simplified, there is a learning curve during the implementation.""The True Key version for mobile phones should be improved. The password manager is not as seamless as on the desktop. Once implemented, on the desktop, when you go to the site, it automatically fills and connects you, whereas, on the mobile phone, it doesn't do that quite seamlessly. You need to open the True Key application and then select the password you want to use. It then opens in the browser. There are fewer steps in the desktop version as compared to the mobile version.""McAfee Web Protection can improve the information provided for hybrid installations in the console. Additionally, having cloud protection would be good.""The manufacturerers should have more transparancy about exactly what is getting filtered when you use the product and why.""I'm not sure if the solution itself is cloud-based or not. If it isn't they really need to begin to develop that out a bit.""The solution could always use more security features. If it was more secure, it would be an even stronger product."

More McAfee Web Protection [EOL] Cons →

"Menlo Security RBI could be more cloud-friendly, and its mobility could be improved."

More Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "$150 Canadian per year."
  • "It is not very expensive. It costs 100 Canadian Dollars per year per license. I buy one-year or two-year protection. The license covers my PC, laptops, and telephone. The cost is per user but for multiple devices. It has just the standard licensing fees. There are some options for extended protection. For example, if I wanted to have a VPN, there will be an extra cost. So, there are upgradable features, but I'm very happy with what it is giving me with the basic plan. It gives me the basic privacy protection that I need."
  • "The license number would be approximately $35,000."
  • "In McAfee Web Protection you have the ability to install any appliance you want with the same license. If you need an appliance on-premise, you can install it with the same license because the license is for users, not for appliances. If you need one more, you can install it and you don't have problems with the license or need to change your environment."
  • "The pricing is cheaper than some of the other options that are available."
  • More McAfee Web Protection [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Internet Security solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I highly recommend McAfee Web Protection. In my opinion, it is a comprehensive web protection platform with a great firewall. I find that it is a lot less bulky than competing solutions on the market… more »
    Top Answer:The stability has a good standard right now.
    Top Answer:The pricing is cheaper than some of the other options that are available.
    Top Answer:Menlo Security RBI's best feature is its threat isolation engine.
    Top Answer:Menlo Security RBI could be more cloud-friendly, and its mobility could be improved. In the next release, I'd like Menlo Security RBI to include a native browser isolation as a hybrid for mobile… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Internet Security
    8th
    out of 17 in Internet Security
    Views
    1,021
    Comparisons
    803
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    278
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    McAfee Web Gateway, McAfee SaaS Web Protection
    Menlo Security Secure Internet
    Learn More
    Overview

    McAfee Web Protection is a web content filtering tool that guards against sophisticated internet threats on every device, user, and location. McAfee Web Protection provides the protection, controls, and deployment flexibility you need, from web filtering and anti-malware scanning to deep content inspection and granular control over Web 2.0 sites.

    Every day, McAfee Labs detects over 100,000 new pieces of malware. Businesses are demanding the finest web security available to combat such expansion as the level of risk continues to rise. McAfee, more than any other vendor, understands the security needs of today's linked Web 2.0 environment and provides the industry's most effective, proactive web security.

    With McAfee Web Protection’s deployment flexibility, businesses can secure personnel at corporate headquarters with hardware or virtual appliances, and remote or traveling staff with cloud services. Branch offices can also send all of their site's traffic to the cloud service, saving money on MPLS networks, which normally backhaul all public-facing web traffic to a central location for processing.

    McAfee Web Protection Features

    McAfee Web Protection has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Deployment versatility: For more deployment flexibility and high availability, you can combine these three deployment options:
    1. on-premises with appliances
    2. virtual environments
    3. cloud
    • High-level security: The McAfee Gateway Anti-Malware Engine, which features a proprietary approach to behavioral analysis, is used by McAfee Web Protection to stop zero-day malware in real time. McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Advanced Threat Defense, McAfee Cloud Threat Detection, and McAfee Threat Intelligence Exchange integration are all provided.
    • Advanced reporting: Regardless of the delivery platform, advanced reporting aggregates the data you need to secure your web presence. McAfee Web Protection provides data that indicates how businesses use the internet, assisting in the compliance of legislation, the identification of trends, the isolation of problems, the documentation of incorrect web activity, and the customization of filtering settings to best regulate web usage policies.
    • Maximum flexibility: McAfee Web Gateway on-premises equipment, McAfee SaaS Web Protection and McAfee Web Filter for Endpoint, are all included in a single subscription. These tools, together, address current demands while allowing for future changes.
    • High-level security: McAfee Web Protection, the top-rated malware protection solution, employs the McAfee Gateway anti-malware engine, which employs a patent-pending behavioral analysis technique.
    • Complete protection, both incoming and outgoing: With a comprehensive web filtering database, McAfee Web Protection follows a business's internet use policy. Malware and other hidden dangers are quickly and effectively protected using layered security.

    Reviews from Real Users

    McAfee Web Protection stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its help with regulatory compliance and its malware and spyware detection. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

    Vivek G., DGM at a financial services firm, writes of the product, “It is functional. It has reduced risk and downtime while also ensuring regulatory compliance, which is critical.” He adds, “I would rate McAfee Web Protection a nine out of ten.”

    Another PeerSpot reviewer, an AVP Information Security at a financial services firm, notes, “If you are browsing web applications, it would help detect any malware. It's very useful for security purposes. The product also protects against spyware. It helps protect and control communications. The product is quite an effective firewall.”

    Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation (RBI) fully enables the way people work by giving administrators the ability to set acceptable use policies to block malicious activity—including compromised websites, cybersquatting, file uploads and downloads, social posting, and other unknown threats. All web content and documents, across a broad browser ecosystem, are safely and accurately rendered in the cloud, away from your endpoints. Admins get all the granular controls and policies they need, while minimizing power draw and keeping the user experience intact. Enable rapid provisioning of users, while guaranteeing connectivity from any location. The Global Elastic Cloud promises secure, optimal web access for remote sites and mobile users worldwide.

    Sample Customers
    Sicredi
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Transportation Company14%
    Government14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Retailer8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise68%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    Internet Security
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, TitanHQ and others in Internet Security. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    McAfee Web Protection [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Internet Security with 16 reviews while Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is ranked 8th in Internet Security with 1 review. McAfee Web Protection [EOL] is rated 8.2, while Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of McAfee Web Protection [EOL] writes "Secure, reasonably priced, and performs well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation writes "Stable and scalable solution with a great threat isolation engine". McAfee Web Protection [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Cisco Umbrella, Cloudflare Access, Perimeter 81 and Skyhigh Security.

    See our list of best Internet Security vendors.

    We monitor all Internet Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.