We performed a comparison between Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and Trend Micro Apex One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"It is stable and scalable."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"I found the initial setup to be easy."
"The independent modules are very good."
"The most valuable network security feature is the network sandbox solution. This sandbox feature works on traffic flow."
"The most valuable feature is user-based policy provision."
"The installation phase of the solution was very easy."
"The agents are easy to deploy."
"It's good that it periodically scans all my drives. I can stay up to date with the status of my drivers and update them if needed."
"The investigation and forensic analysis have been most helpful."
"The main benefit is the threat intelligence network of Trend Micro."
"It's reduced administrative overhead overall thanks to its centralized dashboard and single network administrator."
"Trend Micro Apex One is a seamless solution compared to others."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the endpoint security with the zero-day vulnerability. They have an on-premise sandboxing solution which prevents any of those zero-day vulnerability issues."
"I would emphasize the ease of use and the quality of operations. Trend Micro is quite stable."
"We don't use application control but instead, we use behavior monitoring, which is a good feature. The real-time scanning, data loss prevention, and endpoint sensor we use are beneficial"
"The initial setup is very easy."
"The most valuable features of Trend Micro Apex One are it has its own machine learning and it is quite fast, compared with the other solutions. When you're comparing the other solutions, each has pros and cons, you cannot claim one is 100 percent suitable for you. None of the solutions dominate in all areas."
"Detections could be improved."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"The solution is not stable."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"They could also increase or improve the scalability because to my knowledge the biggest bandwidth can only support up to 10 gigs of input."
"The reports need more development. They need more details on the reports and more details taking the executive view into consideration."
"It has very good integrations. However, its integration with Palo Alto was not good, and they seem to be working on it at the backend. It is not very resource-hungry, but it can be even better in terms of resource utilization. It could be improved in terms of efficiency, memory sizing, and disk consumption by agents."
"The way that signatures work when using this solution could be improved. They could be more user friendly. We would like the ability to select a client's signature from a menu or file share to save time."
"The performance could be better. I noticed that it slows down a bit."
"We would like to solution to offer better security."
"You do not have access to all the features when you use the Trellix web interface. For example, you cannot do device or drive encryption from the web interface. Also, when we're working with customers, it's sometimes challenging to get sales support. Delays mean we might lose an opportunity. Lastly, Trellix lacks some documentation about custom features."
"The price of McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve."
"The reports are not eye-catching from the customer's point of view, which is something that should be improved."
"Sometimes HTTPS sites are not blocked properly."
"It has good signature-based capabilities, but features like “shape detection” can be improved upon."
"We're actually looking to upgrade to more sophisticated ADL products. We need a more sophisticated endpoint. We need to have the ability to automate those instant response processes."
"Trend Micro Apex One should have a DLP (Data loss prevention) module."
"Technical support is very very slow. There is no French support. Only English. The experts are in England, the United States, or Japan, I don't know where. So the support is really lacking."
"I would like to see a sandboxing feature in the next release - which is currently something being supported by a third party - in addition to EDR capability on the cloud applications."
"They should include easy-to-use connectors to make it easier to connect to SIEM."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is ranked 17th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 46 reviews while Trend Micro Apex One is ranked 6th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 123 reviews. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is rated 7.6, while Trend Micro Apex One is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) writes "It integrates well with other solutions, but the vendor needs more of a local presence and faster response". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Apex One writes "Good monitoring and server protection with helpful machine learning". Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Trellix Active Response, whereas Trend Micro Apex One is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, Trend Micro Smart Protection and CrowdStrike Falcon. See our Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. Trend Micro Apex One report.
See our list of best EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) vendors and best EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) vendors.
We monitor all EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.