Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE comparison

Juniper and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Juniper is ranked #46 with an average rating of 9.0, while NETSCOUT is ranked #50 with an average rating of 8.5. Juniper holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Juniper users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Read 2 Marvis Virtual Network Assistant reviews

635 Views
584 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Read 7 NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE reviews

944 Views
897 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE and Marvis Virtual Network Assistant compete in network monitoring solutions. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant appears to have the upper hand with its advanced AI features, providing considerable value.

Features: NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE offers real-time network health insights, comprehensive analytics, and enhances IT operations effectively. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant provides AI-driven troubleshooting, natural language processing, and advanced diagnostic capabilities.

Room for Improvement: NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE could improve by incorporating AI features, modernizing its user interface, and reducing setup complexity. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant could enhance its offline capabilities, improve integration with non-cloud systems, and reduce learning curves associated with AI functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE offers straightforward deployment focusing on strong customer support for smooth infrastructure integration. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant utilizes a flexible cloud-based deployment simplifying setup and maintenance, with efficient customer service leveraged on automation.

Pricing and ROI: NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE has a higher initial setup cost but offers substantial long-term ROI through its monitoring capabilities. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant provides a competitive setup cost with AI-driven insights delivering compelling ROI, appealing to tech-savvy organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

46th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

50th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Marvis Virtual Network Assistant	0.4%
NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE	0.5%
Other	99.1%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

PRADIPJOSHI

Owner at a transportation company with 11-50 employees

Used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts and works on artificial intelligence

I always recommend Marvis to every customer because it requires no additional direct involvement. Marvis has been developed well using AI and machine learning technology. Its AI engine updates itself regularly, which is a beneficial feature. I request that Juniper integrate a cloud identity engine and simplify the Microsoft Azure Active Directory Services integration with the SRX hardware firewall. Additionally, the SRX firewall needs a more robust graphical user interface. Currently, we can only configure the SRX using the CLI; if a wrong command is entered, restoring it cannot be easy. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Ian Munoz

Ingeniero en Telecomunicaciones at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has improved traffic visibility and simplified dashboard use, but could benefit from better integration with other tools

NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE works very well in our case. We have not experienced any troubles with traffic analysis SolarWinds has a dashboard that is older and not as user-friendly. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE has an easier dashboard to manipulate compared to SolarWinds. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE is not…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant uses AI to find problems or to get information from devices."

"If you ask any questions about Marvis, it will respond immediately and use some solution. It will be very easy and save you time."

"I like the single pane of glass view. I like being able to go to one place instead of having to hunt around for everything."

"I like the single pane of glass view because it presents everything in one window, obviously. You can see it all. With a quick glance, you get a pretty good snapshot of what's going on in a particular situation."

"NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE has an easier dashboard to manipulate compared to SolarWinds."

"The most valuable feature of NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE is the network troubleshooting analysis. You can pinpoint an issue before it could shut down the network."

"The solution's technical support team consists of good engineers and technicians."

"This is a very reliable and complete solution for troubleshooting and monitoring environments."

"The most valuable features of this solution are monitoring and maintaining traffic queuing, as well as seeing who is using the bandwidth."

Cons

"It should add real-time application visibility."

"It would be a good idea to integrate the solution to support other vendors besides Juniper."

"In terms of additional features, I would like to see better event notification. Right now, we put in an email address to receive an alert and it receives every event and every alert that comes out. We need something a little more granular."

"NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE is not integrated with SolarWinds. They work in different ways."

"The price of the solution could be reduced."

"Before an attack starts, seeing the traffic behavior and activities would be great. The tool should also share alerts since it is an area where the product has certain shortcomings."

"They require a lot of manual effort as traffic flows, networks, and formal times change."

"The GUI interface and dashboards could be more attractive to the customer."

"Usability is the area with the biggest room for improvement. We've found that with NETSCOUT, while it's a fantastic product, the usability is a major factor because there are just way too many clicks. It's obvious, from our experience, that the people who are developing the product aren't using it."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution."

"The tool's price is okay. On a scale of one to ten, I rate it as a five, where one means it is not expensive, and ten means it is the most expensive."

"The price of NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE is high. The other solutions are less expensive but we cannot depend on the other solutions, they are not as stable."

"Cost is contracted on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost beyond the standard licensing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

22%

Retailer

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

Government

18%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It should add real-time application visibility. Marvis's interface is good. We don't need any additional interface. However, if it could accept voice commands, that would be a great improvement

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It is mainly used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts. Marvis makes it easy to track the issue by providing specific information, like the exact time the connection was lost. It simp...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE?

The tool's price is okay. On a scale of one to ten, I rate it as a five, where one means it is not expensive, and ten means it is the most expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE?

NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE is not integrated with SolarWinds. They work in different ways.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE?

I use the solution in my company to analyze international traffic.

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 38% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 27% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 23% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 13% of the time

More Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Competitors

ThousandEyes vs NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Compared 21% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Compared 15% of the time

Allegro Network Multimeter vs NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Compared 10% of the time

Flowmon vs NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Compared 9% of the time

ScienceLogic vs NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Compared 8% of the time

More NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

January 2026

Download Marvis Virtual Network Assistant product report

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

January 2026

Download NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE product report

Also Known As

No data available

nGeniusPULSE

Overview

Marvis is the first network assistant in the industry to bring conversational AI to networking, transforming the way IT teams interact and engage with enterprise networks. In the era of AIOps, Marvis delivers streamlined operations, simplified troubleshooting, and remarkable user experiences.

Juniper

NETSCOUT’s nGeniusPULSE delivers the visibility needed into today’s evolving IT eco-system to ensure the availability, reliability, and performance of your mission-critical business services across your multi-cloud environment, from wherever users need access.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Banco Votorantim

Buyer's Guide

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

December 2025

Free Report: Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Find out what your peers are saying about Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.