Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG comparison

Juniper and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Juniper is ranked #53 with an average rating of 9.0, while NETSCOUT is ranked #73. Juniper holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Juniper users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Read 2 Marvis Virtual Network Assistant reviews

1,539 Views
1,462 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Read 13 NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG reviews

2,201 Views
2,091 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG and Marvis Virtual Network Assistant are competing in the network management and troubleshooting category. Marvis seems to have the upper hand due to its ease of use and intuitive troubleshooting capabilities.

Features: NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG includes real-time packet capture, deep visibility into network traffic, and comprehensive data analysis. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant offers AI-driven alerts, recommendations, and intuitive network troubleshooting capabilities.

Room for Improvement: NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG could improve its setup procedures to be less complex, reduce the need for advanced technical expertise, and enhance user interface intuitiveness. Marvis could enhance its data analysis depth, expand integration capabilities with third-party tools, and increase customization options for advanced users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is known for straightforward deployment and effective customer service. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG may require more complex deployment and technical expertise but offers extensive network insights.

Pricing and ROI: NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG involves higher initial setup costs but offers significant ROI through enhanced performance visibility. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant presents a cost-effective solution with lower setup expenses and faster ROI due to simplified network operations.

To learn more, read our detailed Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

53rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

73rd

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Marvis Virtual Network Assistant	0.4%
NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG	0.5%
Other	99.1%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

PRADIPJOSHI

Owner at Shree Atharva Sales Corporation

Used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts and works on artificial intelligence

I always recommend Marvis to every customer because it requires no additional direct involvement. Marvis has been developed well using AI and machine learning technology. Its AI engine updates itself regularly, which is a beneficial feature. I request that Juniper integrate a cloud identity engine and simplify the Microsoft Azure Active Directory Services integration with the SRX hardware firewall. Additionally, the SRX firewall needs a more robust graphical user interface. Currently, we can only configure the SRX using the CLI; if a wrong command is entered, restoring it cannot be easy. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Michael Gideon Genita

Associate System Engineer at SMS Global Technologies, Inc.

Easy to set up with good documentation and helpful support

I'm using it for a customer The packet flow switch is the most valuable aspect of the solution. It's an easy product to set up. We can scale the solution if we need to. It's stable. The documentation is well-written and quite useful. It's compatible with other products. Under the pocket flow…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If you ask any questions about Marvis, it will respond immediately and use some solution. It will be very easy and save you time."

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant uses AI to find problems or to get information from devices."

"An issue that used to take days is now fixed within minutes to an hour."

"We use it for monitoring whenever we update a new circuit or site."

"Go with NETSCOUT."

"When we have mobile operators who are signal partners, where one is the roaming host and another is the roamer, we are able to see their traffic. Their packets are able to detect if any faults to develop, and at what point they fail."

"The technical support is really good. They will go above and beyond, if you are running into a problem. You can go to a sales engineer, who will engage technical support to help you out."

"If you are looking for a good application monitoring and packet analysis tool, you can strategically use NETSCOUT to get it done."

"The most valuable feature is utilization."

"The ability to troubleshoot customers' connectivity has been very beneficial."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG pros

Cons

"It should add real-time application visibility."

"It would be a good idea to integrate the solution to support other vendors besides Juniper."

"The solution is not great, but it is not bad."

"Only problems that we have had are fiber issues going into the TAPs or vSTREAMs, which are usually local site issues."

"The scalability has some limitations and quirks to it. I would like to be able to upgrade rather than replace the whole thing."

"It's not able to communicate with our probes."

"The stability depends on who is using the tool, because you only can get as much out of the tool as you put into it. There are a lot of patches for this particular environment, so you have to keep on them. If you lose track of them, then the product is not useful anymore."

"Sometimes, we can't access it."

"The monitoring and reporting tool needs improvement. Users want more information, such as the level of detail when doing a packet analysis. They want more detail to be able to isolate down to a specific point."

"I would like to see an improved level of stitching between IPs."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution."

"The scalability is good, but it comes at a cost. E.g., if you need 100 InfiniStream because you are sending gigs or terabytes of data to one InfiniStream, then you will have to purchase another InfiniStream, which are not cheap."

"I would like it to be more scalable with less spend."

"This product could be cheaper."

"It can be scalable. It just costs too much. With a company as big as ours, it gets too expensive to accommodate every single site."

"The price is a little high."

"To capture more with the solution that we bought, you have to buy another InfiniStreamNG, and there are only four ports in the back."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

18%

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It should add real-time application visibility. Marvis's interface is good. We don't need any additional interface. However, if it could accept voice commands, that would be a great improvement

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It is mainly used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts. Marvis makes it easy to track the issue by providing specific information, like the exact time the connection was lost. It simp...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 21% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 19% of the time

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 13% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 8% of the time

More Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Competitors

Riverbed NPM+ vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 12% of the time

NETSCOUT vSTREAM vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 10% of the time

Flowmon vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 9% of the time

NIKSUN NetVCR vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 7% of the time

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

June 2026

Download Marvis Virtual Network Assistant product report

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

June 2026

Download NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG product report

Also Known As

No data available

InfiniStreamNG, NETSCOUT ISNG, Infinistream

Overview

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant delivers AI-driven solutions for network management, providing intelligent insights and automation to drive operational efficiency and enhance user experience.

Marvis uses machine learning and natural language processing to offer seamless network operations. It contextualizes issues, automates support tasks, and provides actionable insights to help IT teams make informed decisions. This leads to improved network performance and reliability, fostering a proactive approach in managing network environments.

What are the key features of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

AI-driven Insights: Leverages AI to analyze network data and identify patterns, helping in quick issue resolution.
Natural Language Processing: Simplifies user interactions by interpreting natural language queries.
Automated Support: Automates common network tasks, reducing manual intervention.
Contextual Recommendations: Provides suggestions based on network context and usage patterns.

What benefits should be considered in reviews?

Reduced Operational Costs: Automation reduces the need for extensive IT resources.
Enhanced User Experience: Quick issue detection and resolution improve network reliability.
Informed Decision Making: Actionable insights help in strategic network planning.
Increased Efficiency: Automation and AI streamline network management tasks, saving time.

Industries such as healthcare and education implement Marvis Virtual Network Assistant to ensure secure, reliable connectivity. In healthcare, it supports essential communication and patient data management, while in education, it ensures seamless access to digital learning platforms, optimizing both environments effectively.

Juniper

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG delivers fast, cost-efficient network visibility with a single pane of glass view, featuring real-time traffic analysis, dependency mapping, and performance metrics for comprehensive management.

InfiniStreamNG stands out for its real-time insights into network activity, providing a unified platform for managing network components. Its deep packet inspection, scalability, and compatibility make it an essential tool for IT professionals looking to optimize network performance and resolve issues quickly. User-friendly interface enhancements are anticipated for improved usability, alongside early product lifecycle notifications due to extensive certification periods.

What are the key features of NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG?

Speed: Enhances real-time traffic analysis and performance monitoring.
Network Visibility: Provides a comprehensive view with single pane device management.
Packet Inspection: Supports deep packet inspections for detailed data analytics.
Stability and Scalability: Ensures reliable performance and adapts to varying network sizes.
Compatibility: Seamlessly integrates with other technologies for smooth operations.

What are the benefits and ROI of using NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG?

Quick Issue Resolution: Identifies and addresses network issues swiftly.
Efficient Utilization: Offers insights for optimizing resource use and network management.
Proactive Monitoring: Facilitates early detection of potential issues to maintain performance.
Application Performance Tracking: Monitors app connectivity and performance effectively.
KPI Evaluation: Provides comprehensive data for informed decision-making.

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG is implemented across industries for packet collection and analysis, serving network monitoring and troubleshooting needs. Companies in telecommunications monitor LTE roaming traffic, while financial institutions rely on it for analyzing banking data. It supports application connectivity checks and proactive remote site monitoring, becoming integral in evaluating KPIs and reporting network issues.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

U.S. Department of Defense

Buyer's Guide

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

June 2026

Free Report: Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Find out what your peers are saying about Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.