Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG comparison

Juniper and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Juniper is ranked #46 with an average rating of 9.0, while NETSCOUT is ranked #77. Juniper holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Juniper users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.
Marvis Virtual Network Assi...
Read 2 Marvis Virtual Network Assistant reviews
  • 635 Views
  • 584 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG
Read 13 NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG reviews
  • 957 Views
  • 938 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG and Marvis Virtual Network Assistant are competing in the network management and troubleshooting category. Marvis seems to have the upper hand due to its ease of use and intuitive troubleshooting capabilities.

Features: NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG includes real-time packet capture, deep visibility into network traffic, and comprehensive data analysis. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant offers AI-driven alerts, recommendations, and intuitive network troubleshooting capabilities.

Room for Improvement: NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG could improve its setup procedures to be less complex, reduce the need for advanced technical expertise, and enhance user interface intuitiveness. Marvis could enhance its data analysis depth, expand integration capabilities with third-party tools, and increase customization options for advanced users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is known for straightforward deployment and effective customer service. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG may require more complex deployment and technical expertise but offers extensive network insights.

Pricing and ROI: NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG involves higher initial setup costs but offers significant ROI through enhanced performance visibility. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant presents a cost-effective solution with lower setup expenses and faster ROI due to simplified network operations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
46th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.7
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
77th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Marvis Virtual Network Assistant0.4%
NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG0.5%
Other99.1%
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

PRADIPJOSHI - PeerSpot reviewer
PRADIPJOSHI
Owner at a transportation company with 11-50 employees
Used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts and works on artificial intelligence
I always recommend Marvis to every customer because it requires no additional direct involvement. Marvis has been developed well using AI and machine learning technology. Its AI engine updates itself regularly, which is a beneficial feature. I request that Juniper integrate a cloud identity engine and simplify the Microsoft Azure Active Directory Services integration with the SRX hardware firewall. Additionally, the SRX firewall needs a more robust graphical user interface. Currently, we can only configure the SRX using the CLI; if a wrong command is entered, restoring it cannot be easy. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Read full review
Michael Gideon Genita - PeerSpot reviewer
Michael Gideon Genita
Associate System Engineer at SMS Global Technologies, Inc.
Easy to set up with good documentation and helpful support
I'm using it for a customer The packet flow switch is the most valuable aspect of the solution.  It's an easy product to set up. We can scale the solution if we need to. It's stable.  The documentation is well-written and quite useful. It's compatible with other products.  Under the pocket flow…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant uses AI to find problems or to get information from devices."
"If you ask any questions about Marvis, it will respond immediately and use some solution. It will be very easy and save you time."
"We use it for monitoring whenever we update a new circuit or site."
"The technical support is really good. They will go above and beyond, if you are running into a problem. You can go to a sales engineer, who will engage technical support to help you out."
"It has cut our troubleshooting down by days. Once we have a product in place, we show people examples of how it can streamline their troubleshooting process."
"The ability to troubleshoot customers' connectivity has been very beneficial."
"I love the single pane of glass view. It makes it easier to not have to navigate everywhere. It allows more simplistic visibility, without having to go from tool to tool to tool, or from window to window to window."
"The tool has the ability to look back within a month's data. It is very easy to navigate within the tool and troubleshoot the problem, compared to other solutions that we've used in the past."
"When we have mobile operators who are signal partners, where one is the roaming host and another is the roamer, we are able to see their traffic. Their packets are able to detect if any faults to develop, and at what point they fail."
"The most valuable features are speed and cost."
More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG pros
 

Cons

"It should add real-time application visibility."
"It would be a good idea to integrate the solution to support other vendors besides Juniper."
"The stability depends on who is using the tool, because you only can get as much out of the tool as you put into it. There are a lot of patches for this particular environment, so you have to keep on them. If you lose track of them, then the product is not useful anymore."
"The monitoring and reporting tool needs improvement. Users want more information, such as the level of detail when doing a packet analysis. They want more detail to be able to isolate down to a specific point."
"Only problems that we have had are fiber issues going into the TAPs or vSTREAMs, which are usually local site issues."
"There is a timeout feature that we have been asking for awhile."
"I would like to see an improved level of stitching between IPs."
"The technology goes end-of-life on us every year, which is why I am looking forward to vSTREAM. I don't like when devices go end-of-life on us so quickly. If we can get more of an advanced notice of when an end-of-life is brought up, because our certification process within the organization takes a while."
"The NetFlow Collectors could handle more flows per minute."
"I'd like them to make the product more user-friendly."
More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution."
"It can be scalable. It just costs too much. With a company as big as ours, it gets too expensive to accommodate every single site."
"The price is a little high."
"To capture more with the solution that we bought, you have to buy another InfiniStreamNG, and there are only four ports in the back."
"This product could be cheaper."
"The scalability is good, but it comes at a cost. E.g., if you need 100 InfiniStream because you are sending gigs or terabytes of data to one InfiniStream, then you will have to purchase another InfiniStream, which are not cheap."
"I would like it to be more scalable with less spend."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Healthcare Company
22%
Retailer
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
University
7%
Manufacturing Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Government
8%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise8
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?
Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?
It should add real-time application visibility. Marvis's interface is good. We don't need any additional interface. However, if it could accept voice commands, that would be a great improvement
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?
It is mainly used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts. Marvis makes it easy to track the issue by providing specific information, like the exact time the connection was lost. It simp...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Logo
HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant
Compared 38% of the time
Cisco DNA Center vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Logo
Cisco DNA Center vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant
Compared 27% of the time
ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Logo
ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant
Compared 23% of the time
Mist AI and Cloud vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Logo
Mist AI and Cloud vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant
Compared 13% of the time
More Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Competitors
Riverbed NPM+ vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Logo
Riverbed NPM+ vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG
Compared 18% of the time
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG
Compared 15% of the time
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG
Compared 15% of the time
Flowmon vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Logo
Flowmon vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG
Compared 13% of the time
cPacket cClear vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Logo
cPacket cClear vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG
Compared 12% of the time
More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Network Monitoring Software
January 2026
Marvis Virtual Network Assistant reportDownload Marvis Virtual Network Assistant product report
Buyer's Guide
NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG
January 2026
NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG reportDownload NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
InfiniStreamNG, NETSCOUT ISNG, Infinistream
 

Overview

Marvis is the first network assistant in the industry to bring conversational AI to networking, transforming the way IT teams interact and engage with enterprise networks. In the era of AIOps, Marvis delivers streamlined operations, simplified troubleshooting, and remarkable user experiences.

Juniper

NETSCOUT’s new ISNG platform harnesses the power of IP intelligence by mining traffic in real-time to deliver accurate and actionable data for service assurance, cybersecurity and business intelligence applications. The InfiniStreamNG platform fully supports the nGeniusONE and Iris application suites.

NETSCOUT
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
U.S. Department of Defense
Buyer's Guide
Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG
December 2025
Free Report: Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG
Find out what your peers are saying about Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.