Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG comparison

Juniper and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Juniper is ranked #48 with an average rating of 9.0, while NETSCOUT is ranked #77. Juniper holds a 0.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Juniper users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Read 2 Marvis Virtual Network Assistant reviews

208 Views
134 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Read 13 NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG reviews

527 Views
293 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG and Marvis Virtual Network Assistant are competing in the network management and troubleshooting category. Marvis seems to have the upper hand due to its ease of use and intuitive troubleshooting capabilities.

Features: NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG includes real-time packet capture, deep visibility into network traffic, and comprehensive data analysis. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant offers AI-driven alerts, recommendations, and intuitive network troubleshooting capabilities.

Room for Improvement: NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG could improve its setup procedures to be less complex, reduce the need for advanced technical expertise, and enhance user interface intuitiveness. Marvis could enhance its data analysis depth, expand integration capabilities with third-party tools, and increase customization options for advanced users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is known for straightforward deployment and effective customer service. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG may require more complex deployment and technical expertise but offers extensive network insights.

Pricing and ROI: NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG involves higher initial setup costs but offers significant ROI through enhanced performance visibility. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant presents a cost-effective solution with lower setup expenses and faster ROI due to simplified network operations.

To learn more, read our detailed Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

48th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

77th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

PRADIPJOSHI

Owner at Shree Atharva Sales Corporation

Used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts and works on artificial intelligence

I always recommend Marvis to every customer because it requires no additional direct involvement. Marvis has been developed well using AI and machine learning technology. Its AI engine updates itself regularly, which is a beneficial feature. I request that Juniper integrate a cloud identity engine and simplify the Microsoft Azure Active Directory Services integration with the SRX hardware firewall. Additionally, the SRX firewall needs a more robust graphical user interface. Currently, we can only configure the SRX using the CLI; if a wrong command is entered, restoring it cannot be easy. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Michael Gideon Genita

Associate System Engineer at SMS Global Technologies, Inc.

Easy to set up with good documentation and helpful support

I'm using it for a customer The packet flow switch is the most valuable aspect of the solution. It's an easy product to set up. We can scale the solution if we need to. It's stable. The documentation is well-written and quite useful. It's compatible with other products. Under the pocket flow…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant uses AI to find problems or to get information from devices."

"If you ask any questions about Marvis, it will respond immediately and use some solution. It will be very easy and save you time."

"It's an easy product to set up."

"It has cut our troubleshooting down by days. Once we have a product in place, we show people examples of how it can streamline their troubleshooting process."

"It helps us get to root cause quickly. With utilization and consumption of bandwidth, we can usually see what application is taking as much as they should (or shouldn't), then account for it accordingly."

"It is very rock solid. We hardly have any hardware issues."

"I love the single pane of glass view. It makes it easier to not have to navigate everywhere. It allows more simplistic visibility, without having to go from tool to tool to tool, or from window to window to window."

"The technical support is really good. They will go above and beyond, if you are running into a problem. You can go to a sales engineer, who will engage technical support to help you out."

"It allows us to get quicker resolutions. We can see exactly what is using up the bandwidth, so we can assist end users."

"When we have mobile operators who are signal partners, where one is the roaming host and another is the roamer, we are able to see their traffic. Their packets are able to detect if any faults to develop, and at what point they fail."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG pros

Cons

"It would be a good idea to integrate the solution to support other vendors besides Juniper."

"It should add real-time application visibility."

"Being able to manage the packet flow switches in nGeniusONE would be great."

"Only problems that we have had are fiber issues going into the TAPs or vSTREAMs, which are usually local site issues."

"The stability depends on who is using the tool, because you only can get as much out of the tool as you put into it. There are a lot of patches for this particular environment, so you have to keep on them. If you lose track of them, then the product is not useful anymore."

"The technology goes end-of-life on us every year, which is why I am looking forward to vSTREAM. I don't like when devices go end-of-life on us so quickly. If we can get more of an advanced notice of when an end-of-life is brought up, because our certification process within the organization takes a while."

"The single pane of glass feed still needs work."

"The scalability has some limitations and quirks to it. I would like to be able to upgrade rather than replace the whole thing."

"I'd like them to make the product more user-friendly."

"It's not able to communicate with our probes."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution."

"The scalability is good, but it comes at a cost. E.g., if you need 100 InfiniStream because you are sending gigs or terabytes of data to one InfiniStream, then you will have to purchase another InfiniStream, which are not cheap."

"I would like it to be more scalable with less spend."

"To capture more with the solution that we bought, you have to buy another InfiniStreamNG, and there are only four ports in the back."

"It can be scalable. It just costs too much. With a company as big as ours, it gets too expensive to accommodate every single site."

"This product could be cheaper."

"The price is a little high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It should add real-time application visibility. Marvis's interface is good. We don't need any additional interface. However, if it could accept voice commands, that would be a great improvement

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It is mainly used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts. Marvis makes it easy to track the issue by providing specific information, like the exact time the connection was lost. It simp...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 40% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 31% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 29% of the time

More Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Competitors

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 35% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 28% of the time

Riverbed NPM+ vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 19% of the time

cPacket cClear vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 18% of the time

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2025

Download Marvis Virtual Network Assistant product report

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

April 2025

Download NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG product report

Also Known As

No data available

InfiniStreamNG, NETSCOUT ISNG, Infinistream

Overview

Marvis is the first network assistant in the industry to bring conversational AI to networking, transforming the way IT teams interact and engage with enterprise networks. In the era of AIOps, Marvis delivers streamlined operations, simplified troubleshooting, and remarkable user experiences.

Juniper

NETSCOUT’s new ISNG platform harnesses the power of IP intelligence by mining traffic in real-time to deliver accurate and actionable data for service assurance, cybersecurity and business intelligence applications. The InfiniStreamNG platform fully supports the nGeniusONE and Iris application suites.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

U.S. Department of Defense

Buyer's Guide

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

April 2025

Free Report: Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Find out what your peers are saying about Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.