Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG comparison

Juniper and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Juniper is ranked #49 with an average rating of 9.0, while NETSCOUT is ranked #78. Juniper holds a 0.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Juniper users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Read 2 Marvis Virtual Network Assistant reviews

259 Views
110 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Read 13 NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG reviews

546 Views
273 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG and Marvis Virtual Network Assistant are competing in the network management and troubleshooting category. Marvis seems to have the upper hand due to its ease of use and intuitive troubleshooting capabilities.

Features: NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG includes real-time packet capture, deep visibility into network traffic, and comprehensive data analysis. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant offers AI-driven alerts, recommendations, and intuitive network troubleshooting capabilities.

Room for Improvement: NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG could improve its setup procedures to be less complex, reduce the need for advanced technical expertise, and enhance user interface intuitiveness. Marvis could enhance its data analysis depth, expand integration capabilities with third-party tools, and increase customization options for advanced users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is known for straightforward deployment and effective customer service. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG may require more complex deployment and technical expertise but offers extensive network insights.

Pricing and ROI: NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG involves higher initial setup costs but offers significant ROI through enhanced performance visibility. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant presents a cost-effective solution with lower setup expenses and faster ROI due to simplified network operations.

To learn more, read our detailed Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

49th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

78th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

PRADIPJOSHI

Owner at Shree Atharva Sales Corporation

Used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts and works on artificial intelligence

I always recommend Marvis to every customer because it requires no additional direct involvement. Marvis has been developed well using AI and machine learning technology. Its AI engine updates itself regularly, which is a beneficial feature. I request that Juniper integrate a cloud identity engine and simplify the Microsoft Azure Active Directory Services integration with the SRX hardware firewall. Additionally, the SRX firewall needs a more robust graphical user interface. Currently, we can only configure the SRX using the CLI; if a wrong command is entered, restoring it cannot be easy. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Michael Gideon Genita

Associate System Engineer at SMS Global Technologies, Inc.

Easy to set up with good documentation and helpful support

I'm using it for a customer The packet flow switch is the most valuable aspect of the solution. It's an easy product to set up. We can scale the solution if we need to. It's stable. The documentation is well-written and quite useful. It's compatible with other products. Under the pocket flow…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant uses AI to find problems or to get information from devices."

"If you ask any questions about Marvis, it will respond immediately and use some solution. It will be very easy and save you time."

"It's an easy product to set up."

"The most valuable feature is utilization."

"It allows us to get quicker resolutions. We can see exactly what is using up the bandwidth, so we can assist end users."

"The technical support is really good. They will go above and beyond, if you are running into a problem. You can go to a sales engineer, who will engage technical support to help you out."

"It helps us get to root cause quickly. With utilization and consumption of bandwidth, we can usually see what application is taking as much as they should (or shouldn't), then account for it accordingly."

"It has cut our troubleshooting down by days. Once we have a product in place, we show people examples of how it can streamline their troubleshooting process."

"We use it for monitoring whenever we update a new circuit or site."

"The tool has the ability to look back within a month's data. It is very easy to navigate within the tool and troubleshoot the problem, compared to other solutions that we've used in the past."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG pros

Cons

"It would be a good idea to integrate the solution to support other vendors besides Juniper."

"It should add real-time application visibility."

"The single pane of glass feed still needs work."

"The monitoring and reporting tool needs improvement. Users want more information, such as the level of detail when doing a packet analysis. They want more detail to be able to isolate down to a specific point."

"The NetFlow Collectors could handle more flows per minute."

"Only problems that we have had are fiber issues going into the TAPs or vSTREAMs, which are usually local site issues."

"We don't use the single pane of glass view, even though we own it."

"The technology goes end-of-life on us every year, which is why I am looking forward to vSTREAM. I don't like when devices go end-of-life on us so quickly. If we can get more of an advanced notice of when an end-of-life is brought up, because our certification process within the organization takes a while."

"It's not able to communicate with our probes."

"The scalability has some limitations and quirks to it. I would like to be able to upgrade rather than replace the whole thing."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution."

"To capture more with the solution that we bought, you have to buy another InfiniStreamNG, and there are only four ports in the back."

"This product could be cheaper."

"The scalability is good, but it comes at a cost. E.g., if you need 100 InfiniStream because you are sending gigs or terabytes of data to one InfiniStream, then you will have to purchase another InfiniStream, which are not cheap."

"The price is a little high."

"It can be scalable. It just costs too much. With a company as big as ours, it gets too expensive to accommodate every single site."

"I would like it to be more scalable with less spend."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

24%

Retailer

10%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It should add real-time application visibility. Marvis's interface is good. We don't need any additional interface. However, if it could accept voice commands, that would be a great improvement

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It is mainly used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts. Marvis makes it easy to track the issue by providing specific information, like the exact time the connection was lost. It simp...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 30% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 25% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 18% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 16% of the time

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 10% of the time

More Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Competitors

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 29% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 26% of the time

Riverbed NPM+ vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 18% of the time

cPacket cClear vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 16% of the time

NIKSUN NetVCR vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 12% of the time

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

May 2025

Download Marvis Virtual Network Assistant product report

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

June 2025

Download NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG product report

Also Known As

No data available

InfiniStreamNG, NETSCOUT ISNG, Infinistream

Overview

Marvis is the first network assistant in the industry to bring conversational AI to networking, transforming the way IT teams interact and engage with enterprise networks. In the era of AIOps, Marvis delivers streamlined operations, simplified troubleshooting, and remarkable user experiences.

Juniper

NETSCOUT’s new ISNG platform harnesses the power of IP intelligence by mining traffic in real-time to deliver accurate and actionable data for service assurance, cybersecurity and business intelligence applications. The InfiniStreamNG platform fully supports the nGeniusONE and Iris application suites.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

U.S. Department of Defense

Buyer's Guide

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

June 2025

Free Report: Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Find out what your peers are saying about Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.