No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Make vs Superblocks comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 8, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Make
Ranking in AI Software Development
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (6th)
Superblocks
Ranking in AI Software Development
31st
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.2
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Low-Code Development Platforms (26th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the AI Software Development category, the mindshare of Make is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Superblocks is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Software Development Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Make0.5%
Superblocks0.4%
Other99.1%
AI Software Development
 

Featured Reviews

Dinesh Lavu - PeerSpot reviewer
Development Engineer at CSAFI
Automation workflows have saved time and have reduced manual work for my client projects
Most of what I learned about Make is mainly from the templates only. Anything that I tried to do, I try to see who has done it already and try to understand and rebuild it. When I'm trying to build some workflows, there's a chatbot component. When I ask for something, it helps me in that. Or if I get a bug that I'm finding difficult to debug or understand the use case or the log, it clearly explains it to me and sometimes it advises me to do certain things, so that it's easy for me to fix it. One area for improvement is an auto-building feature. Another is how n8n has a chatbot completion where you can bring some LLMs into the workflow and integrating Ollama and all of that is something I felt is really needed for Make also.
AJ
Senior Engineer, Cloud Operations at Cvent
Internal tooling has streamlined access control and operational workflows for cloud teams
The UI is good in most cases, but several friction points have emerged through real-world usage that require workarounds. The pain points are UI customization ceiling. When the team needs non-standard UI patterns, custom layouts, conditional forms, sections, and dynamic component trees, the visual builder becomes a constraint. Workarounds using custom HTML and CSS components are possible but slow and very fragile. There is no structured way to write unit tests for Superblocks logic. Debugging complex JavaScript flows inside the builder is cumbersome compared to a proper IDE environment. Another pain point is documentation and error messages. When an integration fails due to API connection issues or permission errors, the error message surfaced in the builder is often opaque, increasing the debugging time. Superblocks also lacks performance under complexity. Applications with many nested components, large data sets, or high-frequency refresh requirements show noticeable rendering lag. For an infrastructure dashboard displaying live metrics across dozens of resources, this is a real limitation. We have hundreds of AWS accounts, and when someone views the VPN topology or VPC topology of some of the AWS accounts, we see lag issues.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This means the task that I would complete in a span of one day is completed in a matter of minutes by using Make."
"Instead of spending several days implementing and testing API integrations inside our FastAPI back end, I was able to build the workflows in a few hours using Make."
"This has made a very positive impact on my life because initially I was not able to do things quickly and efficiently, but now with the help of Make, I can plan many things that help my work become efficient."
"Make has positively impacted my organization by reducing the number of hours that go into validating and verifying the flow of a particular repetitive process, which would otherwise take multiple hours, to just a few minutes to review for more than 1,000 or 2,000 case scenarios."
"Make has positively impacted my organization by enabling us to solve use cases for hundreds of clients across hundreds of different platforms, providing the customization capabilities to automate accounting and invoicing processes that save dozens of man-hours a month, and allowing us to build custom churn, retention, and engagement costs that have driven a 30% reduction in churn."
"Make has positively impacted my organization by enabling me to generate numerous leads because it is easy to implement, which allowed me to drastically reduce the time needed to create and present a minimum viable product to clients."
"The best features Make offers include its very visual interface, which stands out for me."
"The most valuable features of Make are the additional options when compared to other similar solutions. For example, with Google my business, you can only do certain things with Zapier, whereas with Make, you can do a little bit more."
"With Superblocks, the full workflow submission, routing, approval, provisioning, audit, and deleting the access after twelve hours was built in under a week."
"The best features Superblocks offers include high-quality UI components and the Clark AI agent, which enables fast-speed prototyping and beneficial configurations for initial prototypes and large applications needing easy integration with various databases."
"The time and effort were saved, almost halved, and we were able to build the interfaces and integrate existing APIs more efficiently."
 

Cons

"Pricing is definitely something that is on a higher tier where we are consuming around 1.5 to 2 million operations per month, which makes the bill quite substantial."
"Sometimes the platform is too laggy and loads slowly."
"I give Make a rating of seven because it is not open-sourced and there are many hidden charges, which can affect a beginner's workflow when trying it out."
"One area for improvement is an auto-building feature."
"Make could improve the ease of use, it can be more complicated than other solutions. There are a lot of elements that are more technical than in other solutions."
"I feel that Make can be improved in terms of API handling and integrations."
"Make could be improved by having more platforms and connections that we would like to use, as well as more flexibility in paying for operations, with tasks on a sliding scale instead of by tier."
"Make has helped me save time positively, but I think there is room for improvement in Make as well."
"One area where I think Superblocks could improve is debugging and troubleshooting complex workflows."
"Superblocks also lacks performance under complexity. Applications with many nested components, large data sets, or high-frequency refresh requirements show noticeable rendering lag."
"I chose a six out of ten because, while the UI components and quality are good, the backend presents challenges and there are some limitations including fewer options and less optimal animations that could improve usability."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Software Development solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
15%
Educational Organization
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Construction Company
33%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?
Regarding my experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Make, I would add that they need to provide a dark mode because the UI is in light mode. I remember that when I was working late...
What needs improvement with Make?
I think there are improvements needed for Make. They could add a guide roadmap for beginners to make it more accessible. While Make is easy to use, there is always room for improvement. There are m...
What is your primary use case for Make?
My main use case for Make involves automating social media content creation and personalized content creation for my social profile like Instagram.
What needs improvement with Superblocks?
The UI is good in most cases, but several friction points have emerged through real-world usage that require workarounds. The pain points are UI customization ceiling. When the team needs non-stand...
What is your primary use case for Superblocks?
My company recently adopted Superblocks three or four months ago. I work in a Cloud Infrastructure team, and our primary use for Superblocks is building internal operations tooling, dashboards, wor...
What advice do you have for others considering Superblocks?
Be intentional about what you are building in Superblocks versus custom. Superblocks is excellent for building internal tools with standard functionality. If a tool requires deeply custom hooks, hi...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Integromat
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Buan Consulting, Armadia
1. Airbnb 2. Amazon 3. Apple 4. ATT 5. Bank of America 6. BlackRock 7. Citigroup 8. CocaCola 9. Comcast 10. Costco 11. Delta Air Lines 12.Disney 13. eBay 14. ExxonMobil 15. FedEx 16. Ford Motor Company 17. Google 18. Goldman Sachs 19. Home Depot 20. IBM 21. Intel 22. JPMorgan Chase 23. Kraft Heinz 24. McDonalds 25. Merck 26. Microsoft 27. Nike 28. Oracle 29. PepsiCo 30. Procter Gamble 31. Starbucks 32. Tesla
Find out what your peers are saying about Windsurf, Anthropic, Make and others in AI Software Development. Updated: November 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.