Mailgun vs Mandrill comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Mailgun Technologies Logo
756 views|678 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
MailChimp Logo
520 views|504 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Mailgun and Mandrill based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Email solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Mailgun vs. Mandrill Report (Updated: May 2024).
769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We pay $80 a month to use the solution."
  • More Mailgun Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Email solutions are best for your needs.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It's a very easy product to set up.
    Top Answer:We pay $80 a month to use the solution.
    Top Answer:The solution needs better templating and email validation.
    Top Answer:I would choose MailChimp. The main reason I chose MailChimp is the wide variety of default templates available on it.  Also, I can schedule the emails to go at the specific time zone of each user,… more »
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 33 in Cloud Email
    Views
    756
    Comparisons
    678
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    331
    Rating
    8.0
    9th
    out of 33 in Cloud Email
    Views
    520
    Comparisons
    504
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    MailChimp logo
    Compared 40% of the time.
    SendGrid logo
    Compared 30% of the time.
    Amazon WorkMail logo
    Compared 19% of the time.
    SendinBlue logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    ZeptoMail logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Learn More
    Mailgun Technologies
    Video Not Available
    MailChimp
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Powerful APIs that enable you to send, receive and track email effortlessly.

    Mandrill is a reliable, scalable, and secure delivery API for transactional emails from websites and applications. It's ideal for sending data-driven transactional emails, including targeted e-commerce and personalized one-to-one messages.
    Sample Customers
    Stripe. GitHub, Heroku
    SoundCloud, Envato, Trello
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Insurance Company10%
    Retailer8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise48%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Mailgun vs. Mandrill
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Mailgun vs. Mandrill and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Mailgun is ranked 5th in Cloud Email with 3 reviews while Mandrill is ranked 9th in Cloud Email. Mailgun is rated 8.6, while Mandrill is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Mailgun writes "Reliable, easy to set up, and offers good email-sending capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mandrill writes "It's very straightforward to set up, but you have to be technical to do it". Mailgun is most compared with MailChimp, SendGrid, Amazon WorkMail, SendinBlue and ZeptoMail, whereas Mandrill is most compared with MailChimp and SendinBlue. See our Mailgun vs. Mandrill report.

    See our list of best Cloud Email vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Email reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.