Logz.io vs Trellix ESM comparison

Logz.io and Trellix are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Logz.io is ranked #38 with an average rating of 8.3, while Trellix is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.3. Logz.io holds a 0.4% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Trellix’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Logz.io users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Logz.io

Read 8 Logz.io reviews

974 Views
438 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Trellix ESM

Read 38 Trellix ESM reviews

1,523 Views
1,386 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Logz.io

Trellix ESM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Trellix ESM and Logz.io are two prominent solutions in the security information and event management (SIEM) category. While Logz.io appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features, Trellix ESM offers a cost-effective solution.

Features: Trellix ESM provides integrated threat intelligence, customizable dashboards, and comprehensive support. Logz.io features machine learning capabilities, extensive integrations with other tools, and advanced analytics, making it more robust for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Trellix ESM requires better reporting functionalities, enhanced real-time analytics, and improved log management. Logz.io needs improvements in log storage capacity, more detailed documentation, and optimized data ingestion processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix ESM is known for straightforward deployment and commendable customer support. Logz.io's deployment is slightly more complex, but it offers responsive customer service to mitigate these challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix ESM offers a lower setup cost and faster ROI, making it financially attractive. Logz.io, although higher in initial cost, provides long-term value through its rich features and robust performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Logz.io vs. Trellix ESM Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Logz.io vs. Trellix ESM

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Logz.io

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

38th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (34th)

Trellix ESM

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

20th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Logz.io is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix ESM is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Derrick Brockel

Senior Manager of Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

The solution is a consistent logging platform that provides excellent query mechanisms

We can query a lot of data points and build dashboards. The vendor is good at adjusting their models. Most companies want us to forecast our yearly use and pay it upfront on day one. With Logz.io, we commit to use 14 TB in a year. However, they measure us every month and give us a monthly bill. Depending on our monthly usage, we pay for 14 TB divided by 12 months or a little extra. It's a little bit more like AWS. Other solutions do not do it. They want their money upfront. We really like the dashboards. We have 36 sub-accounts. Each sub-account is an app, and we could put restrictions on that app. Previously, there were capacity restrictions on the sub-accounts. If we have a sub-account of 1 TB and use only 100 GB, we waste 900 GB that day. We could not share it between sub-accounts. Now, they provide an overhead volume. We do a reserve, and any sub-account could use anything over the reserve. It utilizes our footprint better.

Read full review

Daniel Durian

Senior Information Security Manager at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees

Helps to monitor and detect cyberattacks

The tool's effectiveness depends on how you define your log sources. To build visibility of incoming and outgoing traffic, you need logs from perimeter defense, firewalls, web application firewalls, and endpoint protection. With good traffic visibility, incident response time is really quick. Trellix ESM provides situation awareness. On the dashboard, I can see outbound and inbound communications to known threat hosts, IPS/IDS activity, and threat intelligence of the perimeter defense in the firewall. This information helps preempt attacks.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The other nice thing about Logz.io is their team. When it comes to onboarding, their support is incredibly proactive. They bring the brand experience from a customer services perspective because their team is always there to help you refine filters and tweak dashboards. That is really a useful thing to have. Their engagement is really supportive."

"The query mechanism for response codes and application health is valuable."

"InsightOne is the main reason why we use LogMeIn. This is mostly because of log data that we are pushing tools and logs in general."

"We use the product for log collection and monitoring."

"The visualizations in Kibana are the most valuable feature. It's much more convenient to have a visualization of logs. We can see status really clearly and very fast, with just a couple of clicks."

"The tool is simple to setup where it is just plug and play. The tool is reliable and we never had any performance issues."

"We use the tool to track the dev and production environment."

"It is massively useful and great for testing. We can just go, find logs, and attach them easily. It has a very quick lookup. Whereas, before we would have to go, dig around, and find the server that the logs were connected to, then go to the server, download the log, and attach it. Now, we can just go straight to this solution, type in the log ID and server ID, and obtain the information that we want."

"This solution integrates easily and very well with other technologies."

"The most valuable feature is for the security operation center because it provides visibility of all traffic within the company infrastructure."

"The most valuable feature is that if the scanning does find something, it quarantines it. Then you can decide what you are going to do with it."

"It enables us to detect malicious threats, issues, or vulnerabilities in our network."

"It is user-friendly. The notification part of McAfee ESM is very easy."

"We are now able to completely monitor our environment so we can review what is there, which is a big win for us."

"It is easy to use and deploy. It comes with user-friendly manuals."

"The most valuable feature for us is that it comes with many correlations, reports, and dashboards already available. It's also very easy to use."

More Trellix ESM pros

Cons

"I would like granularity on alerting so we can get tentative alerts and major alerts, then break it down between the two."

"The solution needs to expand its access control and make it accessible through API."

"The price can be cheaper and they should have better monitoring."

"The solution needs to improve its data retention. It should be greater than seven days. The product needs to improve its documentation as well."

"I would like them to improve how they manage releases. Some of our integrations integrate specifically with set versions. Logz.io occasionally releases an update that might break that integration. On one occasion, we found out a little bit too late, then we had to roll it back."

"Capacity planning could be a little bit of a struggle."

"When it comes to reducing our troubleshooting time, it depends. When there are no bugs in Logz.io, it reduces troubleshooting by 5 to 10 percent. When there are bugs, it increases our troubleshooting time by 200 percent or more."

"The product needs improvement from a filtering perspective."

"There are always multiple bugs in the product. For example, the console page was hanging multiple times. Afterwards, they released multiple upgrades for the same, multiple patches from McAfee."

"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Product currently requires Flash."

"The solution needs to improve case management. The UI is confusing."

"We cannot add new data sources to the most recent version."

"The only issue I have with McAfee is the amount of computer resources that it takes... it's definitely impacting some of the other applications that are running on a computer at the same time."

"Customized reports and alerting functionality could be included in the dashboard."

"Areas of Trellix ESM that could be improved or enhanced include checking on the clients who are still on-prem, especially banks, as most are not moving everything to the cloud due to confidentiality and accessibility during network outages."

More Trellix ESM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is a little expensive."

"At the time it was set up, we thought Logz.io was very reasonable for what we were getting in terms of how much time and hosting costs it was saving us, because you don't have to run the servers for it anymore."

"You pay for what you need, and that is a good model. They are also quite happy to talk to you about your uses and your use case. They will even go as far as suggesting things that you don't need to do in order to save you money. At one point, I was quite surprised at how cheap it could be if we wanted it to be or how much they would help us manage our costs."

"The tool is an open source product."

"The product's pricing is cheaper than other solutions."

"Regarding pricing, Trellix ESM is not that expensive. It's less than half the cost of IBM QRadar."

"We pay for our licensing fees on a yearly basis, and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"It is an inexpensive product. We purchase its yearly license."

"The product is slightly expensive."

"We renew our license annually."

"The licensing cost is based on EPS."

"The pricing is good, and they are competitive compared to providers such as RSA and IBM QRadar."

"The cost is dependent on the customer's environment and requirements."

More Trellix ESM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at Deloitte & Touche

Feb 26, 2015

HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm

We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Logz.io?

The query mechanism for response codes and application health is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Logz.io?

The product is a little expensive. We're pushing 17 TB. It costs us one and a half million dollars a year.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Logz.io?

Capacity planning could be a little bit of a struggle. The product must add some AI capabilities to learn from previous behaviors. Instead of us setting thresholds, the tool should learn the thresh...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee ESM?

The solution's technical support is great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee ESM?

When discussing Trellix ESM pricing and licensing, if you consider some premium product, the pricing also has to be premium, however, enterprise customers who look for a premium product, alongside ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee ESM?

We need to improve Trellix ESM by making sure that most of the logging devices available in the global market should be covered, and if there is any device which is not covered, there should not be...

See all answers

Comparisons

Coralogix vs Logz.io

Compared 22% of the time

Datadog vs Logz.io

Compared 16% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Logz.io

Compared 13% of the time

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Logz.io

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Logz.io

Compared 10% of the time

More Logz.io Competitors

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs Trellix ESM

Compared 27% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Trellix ESM

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Trellix ESM

Compared 13% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Trellix ESM

Compared 12% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix ESM

Compared 11% of the time

More Trellix ESM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Logz.io

July 2025

Download Logz.io product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix ESM

July 2025

Download Trellix ESM product report

Also Known As

Logz

McAfee ESM, NitroSecurity, McAfee Enterprise Security Manager

Overview

Logz.io is a leading cloud-native observability platform that enables engineers to use the best open source tools in the market without the complexity of operating, managing, and scaling them. Logz.io offers four products: Log Management built on ELK, Infrastructure Monitoring based on Prometheus, Distributed Tracing based on Jaeger, and an ELK-based Cloud SIEM. These are offered as fully managed, integrated cloud services designed to help engineers monitor, troubleshoot and secure their distributed cloud workloads more effectively. Engineering driven companies like Siemens, Unity and ZipRecruiter use Logz.io to simplify monitoring and security workflows, increasing developer productivity, reducing time to resolve issues, and increasing the performance and security of their mission-critical applications.

Logz.io

Make your organization more resilient and confident with Trellix Security Operations. Filter out the noise and cut complexity to deliver faster, more effective SecOps. Integrate your existing security tools and connect with over 650 Trellix solutions and third-party products.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Dish Network, The Economist, Forbes, Holler, Kenshoo, OneSpan, Siemens, Sisense, Unity, ZipRecruiter

San Francisco Police Credit Union, Wªstenrot Gruppe, Volusion, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Government of New Brunswick, State of Colorado, Macquarie Telecom, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Cologne Bonn Airport

Buyer's Guide

Logz.io vs. Trellix ESM

July 2025

Free Report: Logz.io vs. Trellix ESM

Find out what your peers are saying about Logz.io vs. Trellix ESM and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Logz.io vs. Trellix ESM report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.