Logsign Next-Gen SIEM vs Trellix ESM comparison

Logsign and Trellix are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Logsign is ranked #38 with an average rating of 8.0, while Trellix is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.0. Logsign holds a 0.9% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Trellix’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Logsign users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Read 4 Logsign Next-Gen SIEM reviews

1,491 Views
999 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix ESM

Read 38 Trellix ESM reviews

2,163 Views
1,947 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Trellix ESM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Trellix ESM and Logsign Next-Gen SIEM compete in the SIEM category. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM appears superior due to its innovative features and overall value, despite Trellix ESM's support and pricing.

Features: Trellix ESM offers comprehensive threat detection capabilities, customizable dashboards, and strong support. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM provides advanced analytics, automated response features, and a modern, versatile feature set.

Room for Improvement: Trellix ESM needs better integration with third-party tools, improved performance speeds, and enhanced features. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM requires better documentation, more frequent updates, and minor enhancement adjustments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix ESM has a straightforward deployment process and reliable support. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM has quick deployment and responsive support, making it easier to deploy and ensuring consistent support availability.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix ESM offers competitive pricing and decent ROI, attracting budget-conscious users. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM might have higher initial costs but delivers better ROI with its powerful features and efficiency gains.

To learn more, read our detailed Logsign Next-Gen SIEM vs. Trellix ESM Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM vs. Trellix ESM

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

38th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (38th)

Trellix ESM

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

27th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix ESM is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Trellix ESM	1.2%
Logsign Next-Gen SIEM	0.9%
Other	97.9%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Ayaz Ahmed

Cyber Security Specialist at lums

Works well for threat detection and security

Improvements needed in Logsign SIEM are providing specific security alerts that can be filtered and configured more effectively. There should be a focus on delivering alerts tailored to specific needs rather than overwhelming users with numerous alerts. Additionally, incorporating more mature data about threats is necessary for better threat detection.

Read full review

Mohit Dhingra

Senior Vice President IT at AS IT Consulting Pvt. Ltd.

Offers comprehensive report generation while maintaining ease of integration

We need to improve Trellix ESM by making sure that most of the logging devices available in the global market should be covered, and if there is any device which is not covered, there should not be any additional charges for writing the custom parsers on that. We can add some new features regarding AI in the future for Trellix ESM, but the maturity will take a longer time. There are many false positives that happen in an environment during the first couple of months, or around six months, so the system analyst is not able to identify whether the event which has occurred is a true positive or a false positive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Logsign SIEM are its cloud capabilities, alerting functionality, integration with Elastic Search, and configuration options."

"It has full automation and automated SIEM responses."

"Logsign provides sample logs within the product, allowing users to see how logs will appear before integration, which is a valuable feature for testing and understanding log formats."

"McAfee as a whole is a good solution."

"The most valuable feature in ESM is its search and reporting feature. It's really nice."

"This solution integrates easily and very well with other technologies."

"The solution is 100% stable. We really have had a great time working with it. It hasn't let us down."

"The most valuable feature for us is that it comes with many correlations, reports, and dashboards already available. It's also very easy to use."

"Trellix ESM is very user-friendly."

"The most valuable feature is for the security operation center because it provides visibility of all traffic within the company infrastructure."

"Scalability is quite easier with Trellix ESM, because all we need to do is add more receivers to it, so it can go to any point."

More Trellix ESM pros

Cons

"AI and machine learning need to be developed. If they develop those features, I think everything will be fine."

"Improvements needed in Logsign SIEM are providing specific security alerts that can be filtered and configured more effectively."

"I hope they address the pricing model for Logsign Next-Gen SIEM, especially regarding regional variations. The pricing should not differ based on the country of operation as it can lead to dissatisfaction among customers. A fixed pricing structure would be more favorable for us. I would also suggest enhancing the GUI interface and adding features similar to xFi Exchange from IBM Pure. This would streamline operations and save time for analysts."

"There should be support for multitenancy in the product."

"It is not a very advanced solution, and it is for very generic use cases. It cannot cope with the advanced requirements that we're going to have. For example, for multiple authentication failures, it is still based on Windows events for detecting multiple login failures, whereas other companies are going beyond and working on implementing two-factor authentication. It is time to correlate the two-factor authentication results with authentification failures, which is not happening with McAfee ESM. The performance of the tool should be improved because it is very slow. The data display on the console is very slow in McAfee ESM. Its data storage is still old-fashioned, and it should be improved and upgraded to the latest versions. They have to come up with some new ideas to match what other leaders in the same domain are doing. For example, in Splunk, when you search for information for the last 60 days or five months, it quickly shows the information, but that is not the case with McAfee. The results should be quicker and faster on the console. They should integrate some additional features such as User Behavior Analytics (UBA) and automation. The threat intelligence part should also be improved on McAfee."

"I would like to see good analytics in future releases."

"The support from McAfee ESM could improve. They could improve the speed."

"The only issue I have with McAfee is the amount of computer resources that it takes... it's definitely impacting some of the other applications that are running on a computer at the same time."

"There are always multiple bugs in the product. For example, the console page was hanging multiple times. Afterwards, they released multiple upgrades for the same, multiple patches from McAfee."

"The solution needs to improve case management. The UI is confusing."

"McAfee ESM is not user-friendly and the log is not accurate. For instance, if I were assigned to generate a log for changes made today, I wouldn't be able to see all the modifications. While Palo Alto allows us to see all changes, McAfee ESM only captures one out of every ten changes. It's crucial to have visibility into all changes made."

More Trellix ESM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to other SIEMs, it has low pricing."

"The pricing is fair."

"The pricing is good, and they are competitive compared to providers such as RSA and IBM QRadar."

"The cost is all included. The finance department handles the financial part, and we mostly don't get involved in it."

"The product is slightly expensive."

"The licensing cost is based on EPS."

"Regarding pricing, Trellix ESM is not that expensive. It's less than half the cost of IBM QRadar."

"McAfee is the right choice for a low-budget solution."

"We pay for our licensing fees on a yearly basis, and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

More Trellix ESM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Feb 26, 2015

HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm

We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Consumer Goods Company

Comms Service Provider

16%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Logsign Next-Gen SIEM?

It does not have much AI and machine learning features yet. They are developing them and will be releasing them in a few months.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Logsign Next-Gen SIEM?

We use Logsign SIEM for various tasks in our daily operations. One key use case is for forensic analysis. We also use it to monitor critical servers and generate security alerts for actions like lo...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Logsign Next-Gen SIEM?

Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten. AI and machine learning need to be developed. If they develop those features, I think everything will be fine. I can recommend it. Not for large enterp...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee ESM?

When discussing Trellix ESM pricing and licensing, if you consider some premium product, the pricing also has to be premium, however, enterprise customers who look for a premium product, alongside ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee ESM?

Areas of Trellix ESM that could be improved or enhanced include checking on the clients who are still on-prem, especially banks, as most are not moving everything to the cloud due to confidentialit...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for McAfee ESM?

My customer's usual use case for Trellix ESM involves one client, as most of the users have moved to ESM. Nowadays, they don't use IPS only, since McAfee IPS is standalone; they incorporate firewal...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 15% of the time

Fluency vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 10% of the time

Wazuh vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 7% of the time

Falcon LogScale vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Watson for Cyber Security vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 6% of the time

More Logsign Next-Gen SIEM Competitors

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs Trellix ESM

Compared 20% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Trellix ESM

Compared 14% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix ESM

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Trellix ESM

Compared 10% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Trellix ESM

Compared 6% of the time

More Trellix ESM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

February 2026

Download Logsign Next-Gen SIEM product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix ESM

January 2026

Download Trellix ESM product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee ESM, NitroSecurity, McAfee Enterprise Security Manager

Overview

Logsign delivers automation-driven cyber security solutions and are committed to providing the smartest, easiest-to-use and most affordable cybersecurity detection and response solutions and value-added services. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is an enterprise-grade SIEM, inline with our promise, it's easy-to-deploy, easy-to-use and affordable unlike the other enterprise-grade SIEM softwares.

Easy-to-deploy, easy-to-use and affordable SIEM for all.
Unlimited scalability, high availability - cluster SIEM, big data infrastructure.
Deploy on every environment, on-premise solution.
400+ predefined integrations and free plugin service.
Collects & stores unlimited data.
Threat hunting, fast search & investigation, advanced behavior analysis, IOC detection.
Real-time detection & prevention, wide correlation library based on Mitre Att&ck framework.
Real-time monitoring, predefined dashboards & reports, meeting compliance requirements (PCI DSS, ISO 27001, HIPAA, SOX and more).
Automated notifications, automated actions.
Flexible pricing options, and more information and for more automated response features, please look for our SOAR platform.

Logsign

Make your organization more resilient and confident with Trellix Security Operations. Filter out the noise and cut complexity to deliver faster, more effective SecOps. Integrate your existing security tools and connect with over 650 Trellix solutions and third-party products.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Turkish Petroleum, Tırsan, DP World, SAC American Colleges, Robert College, Unlu&Co, UniCo Insurance Company, ETSTur, CK Energy, UEDAS Energy, Wilo, Eurocross Assistance, Deloitte Turkey, Incı GS Yuasa, Pappara, Bilgi University, Anadolu University, İstanbul University, The Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, TRT, Anadolu Media Agency, Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Services, Ispark, Spor AS and wide range of enterprises in different industries.

San Francisco Police Credit Union, Wªstenrot Gruppe, Volusion, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Government of New Brunswick, State of Colorado, Macquarie Telecom, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Cologne Bonn Airport

Buyer's Guide

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM vs. Trellix ESM

February 2026

Free Report: Logsign Next-Gen SIEM vs. Trellix ESM

Find out what your peers are saying about Logsign Next-Gen SIEM vs. Trellix ESM and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Logsign Next-Gen SIEM vs. Trellix ESM report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.