Layer7 API Management vs Pipedream comparison

Broadcom and Pipedream are both solutions in the API Management category. Broadcom is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.6, while Pipedream is ranked #21 with an average rating of 9.0. Broadcom holds a 2.9% mindshare in APIM, compared to Pipedream’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Pipedream users who would recommend it.

Layer7 API Management

Read 112 Layer7 API Management reviews

4,452 Views
3,228 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Pipedream

Read 4 Pipedream reviews

140 Views
50 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Layer7 API Management

Pipedream

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Layer7 API Management and Pipedream are competing in the API management and integration space. Layer7 leads in robust enterprise-level API security and management, while Pipedream is favored for its integration and automation capabilities, appealing to smaller teams or individual developers.

Features: Layer7 API Management offers comprehensive API security and policy enforcement, advanced authentication and authorization protocols, and robust management capabilities for enterprises. Pipedream provides seamless integration between web services, intuitive workflow automation, and ease of setup for rapid interoperability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Layer7 API Management caters to large enterprises with a complex deployment model, detailed documentation, and professional support. Pipedream provides straightforward cloud-based deployment with an emphasis on simplicity and flexibility, supported by responsive online services and a strong community.

Pricing and ROI: Layer7 API Management features a higher initial setup cost, suitable for enterprises prioritizing long-term security and scalability. Pipedream offers a cost-effective entry with a scalable pricing model, benefiting smaller budgets and emphasizing quick ROI through rapid deployment.

To learn more, read our detailed Layer7 API Management vs. Pipedream Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Layer7 API Management vs. Pipedream

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Layer7 API Management

Ranking in API Management

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

112

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Pipedream

Ranking in API Management

21st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Layer7 API Management is 2.9%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pipedream is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Ronald D'Souza

Presales Consultant for CA Southern Africa at Hyperion Holding Pty Ltd

Has great drag-and-drop features and it requires minimal coding

I have mainly implemented using Layer 7 API Management. Some of the major challenges we were able to meet with a quick release to market methodology. Some of the tasks which we achieved for our customers were: 1. Translation service from SOAP to REST and vice versa. 2. API service to DB (Oracle, MySQL, MSSQL, Snowflake, SAP HANA) -- Created Swagger APIs that were able to perform CRUD operation to the backend API mentioned above and provided routes to query and get data. 3. Integration with Payment gateway service providers to perform (transaction on behalf of the customer with third-party payment gateway service providers white labeled with our APIs ) -- Followed TMF standards for payment gateway integration with the Telcom world. 4. Orchestration of the API. Build multiple microservers and provided orchestration based on route, path, and data in the request and perform actions that would be communicated with multiple APIs and provide a single consolidated response. 5. Provided API-driven security (Oauth 2.0, JWT, SAML, Basic, and a variety of means) to access the API giving the developer the freedom to concentrate only on application/service/microservice and let the gateway handle the threat. 6. Seamless Mutual Authentication allowed good segregation between APIs in the DMZ and internal network.

Read full review

FrankHo

Analyst at MSXI

A tool that ensures that its users see a return on investment from its use

The UI and the fact that the product is not easy to use are areas with shortcomings where improvements are required. Documentation isn't available for everything in the solution, so you may have to figure out a lot of things by yourself. Pipedream is easy to use for someone with tech skills or someone new who is trying to learn how to code. Though it is user-friendly for people with tech skills, it is not at all user-friendly for people who do not have any tech skills. The user interface of Pipedream is very simple compared to the user interfaces of some other products like monday.com or Asana. Asana and monday.com have visually appealing user interfaces. The user interface of Pipedream is not visually appealing at all. The aforementioned details need to be considered for improvement in the solution. I just wish there was a little bit more documentation on how everything worked when it came to deployment since I was a fairly new employee at the company at that time. Sometimes, the workflow wouldn't work fine in Pipedream, and I had to check it myself for errors. Finding the errors in Pipedream is hard to find. I think it would be good if Pipedream had the ability to send an email to notify you that there is an error with the code instead of having to go back in and then look every day or every hour if there was an error in the code.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The administration interface (Policy Manager) is very easy to understand and use."

"The solution has numerous configuration options to increase security in communication."

"The Portal API helps us with deployments. It also helps to have a catalog of everything. The replication is also a critical feature for us. It helps to have a more robust architecture and makes our systems are highly available."

"This improved our organization, because it gives the management data to discuss for the next course of action and it suggests what to work on, as the next thing."

"The out-of-the-box security features are useful. Right now, you can just right-click and drag and drop the assertions with the rate limit. That, as well as the x-amount surge protection, is built in so we can bring that in."

"It's pretty easy to use, and once we have templating set up we can add new APIs, at least through the gateway, and apply the security to them; it takes a minute."

"Layer7 API Management is most valued for its drag-and-drop functionalities, the available policy options, and the excellent security features."

"The speed and versatility in the implementation of APIs without writing a line of code in any programming language."

More Layer7 API Management pros

"The solution enables users to integrate several things."

"The most valuable features of Pipedream are the prebuilt integrations that require no coding."

"The most valuable feature of Pipedream is the ability to use Python code in general."

"It is a developer-friendly platform that allows writing custom scripts."

Cons

"I understand that clients are often concerned about costs. They might be exploring other options due to the high cost associated with our current package."

"What is really important is that they offer the solution as a service, on a subscription or monthly basis, which will make it more attractive. That is where the market is headed. There are competitors within the industry that are doing that currently. I would encourage CA to do that."

"They need a multifactor authentication solution for the API layer and the other layers, as well."

"There could be more integration options included in the product."

"If they had different levels of support available then it would be easier to justify the costs."

"There is a need for the migration of policies, better reporting, and monitoring integration."

"Layer7 API Management could have a live API creator feature, so my team can easily create APIs. Right now, the product doesn't have that feature."

"The product's initial setup phase is not very straightforward, making it an area where improvements are required."

More Layer7 API Management cons

"There is a potential area for improvement in handling loop operations over items."

"Documentation isn't available for everything in the solution, so you may have to figure out a lot of things by yourself."

"They should give more information about trigger failure."

"We faced some server timeouts."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's my manager who takes care of the pricing. But I keep on hearing that it's a little pricey, it's on the higher side. That is what he says."

"The product is moderately priced."

"It was very high at that time. We are a Broadcom CA partner, and we got it only for testing purposes. We didn't pay anything for it."

"CA API Management has a licensing path. If you want more features, it requires more licenses and more installation time."

"I feel that it is costly for medium-sized companies."

"I do not have experience with the pricing or licensing of the product."

"I think it's competitive. It's not that expensive when you compare CA with the Oracle product."

"There is an annual license for the use of this solution. I think we are paying for some support maintenance fees, included in that license. I don't know how it works. They should provide more information."

More Layer7 API Management pricing and cost advice

"The product price is fair and inexpensive than one of the competitors."

"Price-wise, for a company, it is a nice product, but for personal use, it is not very beneficial."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Layer7 API Management?

The solution's technical support is good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Layer7 API Management?

Pricing is more than average. While I am used to Layer7 API Management ( /products/layer7-api-management-reviews ), seeing other products makes the tool's pricing seem high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Layer7 API Management?

Broadcom's push for upgrades from version nine to ten, ten to 10.3, and onwards to twelve needs improvement in migration processes, especially with service dependencies. The migration path sometime...

See all answers

What do you like most about Pipedream?

It is a developer-friendly platform that allows writing custom scripts.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pipedream?

The product price is fair and inexpensive than Zapier.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pipedream?

They could provide seamless integration with Jira, similar to classic code integration. Additionally, they should give more information about trigger failure.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apigee vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 31% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 12% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 8% of the time

More Layer7 API Management Competitors

MuleSoft API Manager vs Pipedream

Compared 100% of the time

More Pipedream Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Layer7 API Management

April 2025

Download Layer7 API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

API Management

April 2025

Download Pipedream product report

Also Known As

CA API Management, CA Live API Creator, Espresso Logic, CA API Gateway

No data available

Overview

Layer7 API Management is a comprehensive solution that enables organizations to securely expose, manage, and monetize their APIs.

It provides features such as API gateway, developer portal, analytics, and security to ensure seamless integration and control over API traffic.

With Layer7 API Management, businesses can streamline their API operations and drive innovation.

Broadcom

Pipedream is an innovative workflow automation platform designed to streamline and simplify complex data integrations and workflows. Its primary use case is to connect various applications, services, and APIs, enabling seamless data transfer and automation across different systems.

The most valuable functionality of Pipedream is its ability to create and manage workflows using a visual interface. Users can easily build and customize workflows by connecting different actions and triggers, without the need for coding. Pipedream supports a wide range of triggers and actions, allowing users to automate tasks such as data extraction, transformation, and loading, as well as event-driven actions like sending notifications or updating databases.

Pipedream helps organizations by reducing manual effort and improving efficiency. It enables teams to automate repetitive tasks, freeing up valuable time and resources. With its extensive library of pre-built integrations and connectors, Pipedream simplifies the process of connecting and integrating various systems, eliminating the need for custom development. This empowers organizations to quickly build and deploy complex workflows, accelerating their digital transformation initiatives.

Furthermore, Pipedream provides real-time monitoring and debugging capabilities, allowing users to track the execution of workflows and troubleshoot any issues. It also offers advanced features like version control and collaboration, enabling teams to work together on building and maintaining workflows.

Pipedream

Sample Customers

1. IBM 2. Microsoft 3. Oracle 4. Salesforce 5. SAP 6. Cisco 7. Dell 8. HP 9. Adobe 10. VMware 11. Accenture 12. Capgemini 13. Deloitte 14. PwC 15. Ernst & Young 16. Infosys 17. TCS (Tata Consultancy Services) 18. Wipro 19. Cognizant 20. HCL Technologies 21. Tech Mahindra 22. Fujitsu 23. Hitachi 24. NEC 25. NTT Data 26. Ericsson 27. Nokia 28. Siemens 29. AT&T 30. Verizon 31. Vodafone 32. Orange

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Layer7 API Management vs. Pipedream

April 2025

Free Report: Layer7 API Management vs. Pipedream

Find out what your peers are saying about Layer7 API Management vs. Pipedream and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Layer7 API Management vs. Pipedream report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.