Klocwork vs Venn Software comparison

Perforce and Venn Software are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Perforce is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.1, while Venn Software is ranked #59. Perforce holds a 1.4% mindshare in AS, compared to Venn Software’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Venn Software users who would recommend it.

Klocwork

Read 25 Klocwork reviews

2,205 Views
1,361 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Venn Software

Read 3 Venn Software reviews

136 Views
33 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Klocwork

Venn Software

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Klocwork and Venn Software compete in static code analysis, each offering unique strengths. Klocwork tends to benefit from user satisfaction in deployment ease and customer support, while Venn Software excels in feature robustness, potentially justifying its cost.

Features: Klocwork offers efficient bug detection, seamless integration, and a notable ease of use which together create a user-friendly experience tailored for streamlining coding processes. Venn Software provides a comprehensive feature set with advanced AI-driven analysis, extensive language support, and powerful tools for code inspection, ideal for those requiring a broad range of capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Klocwork users express a desire for more intuitive navigation, enhanced reporting, and additional customization options to meet growing functional needs. For Venn Software, faster processing times, better scalability, and optimization in system responsiveness are key areas where users see potential growth.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Klocwork is recognized for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service, making it accessible to users with varying levels of tech expertise. Venn Software, although valued for robust support, poses challenges during initial setup due to its complex infrastructure, which can initially hinder user experience until full acclimation is achieved.

Pricing and ROI: Klocwork is seen as cost-effective, with quick ROI attributed to lower setup expenses and efficient operations. Venn Software, although more costly, promises long-term gains with its extensive functionality and predictive analytics, offering a high return for those willing to invest more initially.

To learn more, read our detailed Klocwork vs. Venn Software Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Klocwork vs. Venn Software

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Klocwork

Ranking in Application Security Tools

18th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (16th), Static Code Analysis (5th)

Venn Software

Ranking in Application Security Tools

59th

Average Rating

9.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Access (31st), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (34th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Klocwork is 1.4%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Venn Software is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

AnirbanSarkar

Head - Solution Management Group at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.

Lets you find defects during the development phase, so you don't have to wait till the development is over to find and address flaws

What needs improvement in Klocwork, compared to other products in the market, is the dashboard or reporting mechanisms that need to be a bit more flexible. The Klocwork dashboard could be improved. Though it's good, it's not as good as some of the other products in the market, which is a problem. The reporting could be more detailed and easier to sort out because sorting in Klocwork could be a bit more time-consuming, mainly when sorting defects based on filters, compared to how it's done on other tools such as Coverity. What I'd like added in the next release of Klocwork is the peer code review Cahoots which used to be a part of Klocwork, and the architecture analysis and both have been taken out of Klocwork. I found the two critical for specific deployments, so if those can be brought back to Klocwork, that would be very good.

Read full review

reviewer2110356

Growth Specialist at Digitrends Soultions

Great for hybrid workers, minimizes latency and delivers great performance

We haven't encountered major issues with the solution. We are really happy that we decided to purchase Venn Software, although they are quite new. The initial setup is seamless. It's not overly complex. In our experience, for the most part, the solution is reliable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches. That said, the performance could be a bit better. We'd like to see a bit more done with the deployment capabilities. The solution needs to offer better local or regional support to cater to offshore users.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best advantage of Klocwork is the reduced setup time."

"There is a central Klocwork server at our headquarter in France so we connect the client directly to the server on-premises remotely."

"It's integrated into our CI, continuous integration."

"I like not having to dig through false positives. Chasing down a false positive can take anywhere from five minutes for a small easy one, then something that is complicated and goes through a whole bunch of different class cases, and it can take up to 45 minutes to an hour to find out if it is a false positive or not."

"Technical support is quite good."

"On-the-fly analysis and incremental analysis are the best parts of Klocwork. Currently, we are using both of these features very effectively."

"The customer support team is very responsive, proactive, and engages in conversations to ensure our needs are met."

"The tool helps the team to think beforehand about corner cases or potential bugs that might arise in real-time."

More Klocwork pros

"It allows us to improve our security and prevent company files and data leaks."

"Since the software is launched directly from the computer, not remotely delivered, it has minimized latency and response time."

"We don't need to go to the physical office, and it only requires minimal supervision or assistance from our IT Team."

Cons

"I believe it should support more languages, such as Python and JavaScript."

"There are too many warnings, and it requires expertise to determine the correct category for them."

"I would like to see better codes between projects and a more user-friendly desktop in the next release."

"Klocwork sometimes provides too many additional warnings which require expertise to manage."

"Customers using different static analysis tools report more issues than with Klocwork, indicating that Klocwork's engine is not as superior."

"Every update that we receive requires of us a lengthy and involved process."

"Modern languages, such as Angular and .NET, should be included as a part of Klocwork. They have recently added Kotlin as a part of their project, but we would like to see more languages in Klocwork. That's the reason we are using Coverity as a backup for some of the other languages."

"Klocwork sometimes provides too many additional warnings which require expertise to manage."

More Klocwork cons

"It would be better to have the back end more efficient."

"We'd like to see a bit more done with the deployment capabilities."

"Currently, Venn only uses two platforms/applications: Windows and Mac. It would be great if they could also add more platforms since some BYOD employees might be using an application other than Windows or Mac - for example, Linux."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing fees are paid annually, but they also have a perpetual license."

"Klocwork is still tight on their licensing. If Klocwork would loosen up on the licensing, and where the license could be used, and how many different programs could be run on it, then we have several development programs that I would love to be able to use it for going forward."

"The limitation that we have is that Klocwork is licensed to certain programs, and if you want to license them to other programs, you have to pay more money."

"There are other solutions on the market such as Microsoft Visual Studio. They have been adding more static code analysis features that come for free. It is getting better all the time. That is one of the possibilities is that we've been considering that we may stop using the Klocwork because it doesn't give us any added value."

"The pricing for Klocwork is very competitive if you compare it from apple to apple. It has competitive pricing regarding the licensing model and the per-license cost. Klocwork isn't a high-end investment for anyone deploying it; even SMBs can afford it. The Klocwork cost per user would depend on the license type, so I'm unable to mention a ballpark figure because it would depend on the type of installation and how the deployment will be, and the nodes to give an accurate calculation or figure. The total price depends on the package, so my company could never publish pricing for Klocwork on the website. My team first collects information from potential clients on the deployment scenario, project environment, etc., before suggesting a package for Klocwork. My rating for Klocwork in terms of pricing is a five because of its flexible license models. There's a license model for every type of organization, whether small, midsize, or enterprise, so it's a five out of five for me."

"Klocwork should not to be quite so heavy handed on the licensing for very specific programs."

"When it comes to licensing, the solution has two packages, one for a fixed and the other for a floating server, with the former being more cost effective than the latter."

"This solution offers competitive pricing."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

23%

Educational Organization

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Klocwork?

It's integrated into our CI, continuous integration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Klocwork?

Klocwork's pricing seems attractive, as it uses a per-user license model that does not have a lot of overhead.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Klocwork?

One area for improvement is that when customers use different static analysis tools, they report more issues compared to Klocwork. The static analysis engine of Klocwork has areas that need improve...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Klocwork

Compared 32% of the time

Coverity vs Klocwork

Compared 31% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Klocwork

Compared 13% of the time

Helix QAC vs Klocwork

Compared 4% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs Klocwork

Compared 3% of the time

More Klocwork Competitors

Microsoft Intune vs Venn Software

Compared 67% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Venn Software

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs Venn Software

Compared 13% of the time

More Venn Software Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Klocwork

June 2025

Download Klocwork product report

Buyer's Guide

Remote Access

June 2025

Download Venn Software product report

Overview

Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.

Perforce

Venn Software is a powerful platform lauded for its robust features, intuitive UI, and responsive customer support. Users appreciate its scalability, customization options, and seamless integration capabilities. However, a few reviews mention occasional performance issues and a steep learning curve, making it challenging for beginners. Based on user reviews, Venn Software provides a reliable solution for businesses seeking advanced functionality, but newcomers may require additional time and support to fully utilize its potential.

Venn Software

Sample Customers

ACCESS Co Ltd, Risk-AI, Winbond Electronics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, University of Southern California, Alebra Technologies, SIMULIA, Risk Management Solutions, Brigham Young University, SRD, HRL

Venn is currently being used by 700+ organizations. The newest version of our secure workspace is selling not only to our existing customer base but to new companies like Voya, ModSquad, TTech and many others.

Buyer's Guide

Klocwork vs. Venn Software

June 2025

Free Report: Klocwork vs. Venn Software

Find out what your peers are saying about Klocwork vs. Venn Software and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Klocwork vs. Venn Software report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.