Kiuwan vs Parasoft SOAtest comparison

Kiuwan and Parasoft are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Kiuwan is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.8, while Parasoft is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.0. Kiuwan holds a 1.0% mindshare in SAST, compared to Parasoft’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Kiuwan users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Parasoft users who would recommend it.

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

1,350 Views
1,036 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 31 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

929 Views
571 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Parasoft SOAtest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and Kiuwan compete in quality assurance and security testing. Kiuwan often has the upper hand due to its strong security focus.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest offers comprehensive test automation, seamless integration with various tools, and robust load testing capabilities. Kiuwan provides precise code analysis, extensive language support, and strong security insights.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could improve its documentation and report generation. Kiuwan needs better integration with certain environments and further enhancements in analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest has a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Kiuwan users face challenges during setup but benefit from efficient support.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest has higher initial setup costs with a satisfactory ROI over time. Kiuwan offers a more cost-effective setup, leading to favorable ROI due to its security features.

To learn more, read our detailed Kiuwan vs. Parasoft SOAtest Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan vs. Parasoft SOAtest

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiuwan

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

24th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (28th)

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

28th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (20th), API Testing Tools (11th), Test Automation Tools (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at Deloitte

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Ajit Kumar Rout

Sr Quality Assurance Engineer at Wabtec Industrial

Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved

In general, this is a hassle free, user friendly tool and it doesn't require much knowledge if you're using the manual testing. Automated testing is also good but requires some knowledge in that field. It has some great features. It's a good tool compared to some of the other paid tools; input and output can be stored before extension and there is also a verification assessment that can be implemented by using some different methodologies inside the tool. If the licensing cost is suitable then I recommend this solution. If you have automation people with in-depth knowledge in coding that will be helpful. I rate this solution a seven out of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the time to resolution, where it tells you how long it is going to take to get to a zero-base or a five-star security rating."

"Lifecycle features, because they permit us to show non-technical people the risk and costs hidden into the code due to bad programming practices."

"We use Kiuwan to locate the source of application vulnerabilities."

"Software analytics for a lot of different languages including ABAP."

"I have found the security and QA in the source code to be most valuable."

"The feature that I have found the most valuable in Kiuwan is the speed of scanning. Compared to other SaaS tools I have used, Kiuwan is much quicker in performing scans. I have not yet used it on a large code base, but from what I have experienced, it is efficient and accurate. Additionally, I have used it both manually and in an automated pipeline, and both methods have been effective. The speed of scanning is what makes it valuable to me."

"I've tried many open source applications and the remediation or correction actions that were provided by Kiuwan were very good in comparison."

"I like that I can scan the code without sending it to the Kiuwan cloud. I can do it locally on my device. When the local analyzer finishes, the results display on the dashboard in the cloud. It's essential for security purposes to be able to scan my code locally."

More Kiuwan pros

"The testing time is shortened because we generate test data automatically with SOAtest."

"We have seen a return on investment."

"Automatic testing is the most valuable feature."

"Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."

"Generating new messages, based on the existing .EDN and .XML messages, is a crucial part or the testing project that I’m currently in."

"One of the most valuable features I found in Parasoft SOAtest is its ability to extend the product."

"Technical support is helpful."

"If you want something that’s not provided out of the box, then you can write it yourself and integrate it with SOAtest."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

Cons

"DIfferent languages, such Spanish, Portuguese, and so on."

"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."

"I would like to see better integration with the Visual Studio and Eclipse IDEs."

"The QA developer and security could be improved."

"The configuration hasn't been that good."

"Perhaps more languages supported."

"It would be beneficial to streamline calls and transitions seamlessly for improved functionality."

"The next release should include more flexibility in the reporting."

More Kiuwan cons

"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."

"The summary reports could be improved."

"Reporting facilities can be better."

"The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective."

"The performance could be a bit better."

"Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements."

"Parasoft SOAtest has an internal refresh function where you can refresh the software to show the changes you’ve made in your projects. Unfortunately this function does not work properly, because it often does not show the changes after you’ve hit te refresh button a few times."

"Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"Check with your account manager."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

24%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Kiuwan?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kiuwan?

I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiuwan?

See all answers

What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?

Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro. The new management does not want subscription tools around, aiming for scripted tests us...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

One area that could use improvement is the cryptography capabilities in Parasoft SOAtest. It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our ow...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Kiuwan

Compared 53% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 9% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 9% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 9% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Kiuwan

Compared 5% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 23% of the time

Postman vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 21% of the time

Coverity vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

April 2025

Download Kiuwan product report

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

April 2025

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Also Known As

No data available

SOAtest

Overview

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Kiuwan

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

Sample Customers

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan vs. Parasoft SOAtest

April 2025

Free Report: Kiuwan vs. Parasoft SOAtest

Find out what your peers are saying about Kiuwan vs. Parasoft SOAtest and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kiuwan vs. Parasoft SOAtest report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.