Katalon Test Ops vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

"I noticed that only the enterprise version has integration with GitHub."

"It's more user-friendly as a solution."

"Katalon Test Ops has AI features that speed up the process by automating tasks that would otherwise be done manually."

"The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about."

"You can easily write code, test, and deploy within the same environment. It is a mature tool. It regularly receives new updates and versions. In my opinion, it's one of the best products by Microsoft for developers."

"This product is a nine out of ten."

"The ability to quickly make your own components has been valuable."

"The tool has highly detailed debugging features."

"Visual Studio is an exemplary integrated development environment that stands out due to its exceptional features. It allows for the seamless selection of the appropriate programming language for the specific development tasks at hand. This facilitates a swift and effortless transition between languages, providing a highly efficient development experience."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability."

"The solution is very useful for compiling existing projects and developing new projects."

"The free version is limited."

"The execution module of Katalon Test Ops may need some improvement, especially when running a high volume of test scripts."

"There are stability troubles. My area does not have a good connection. That's why sometimes I face issues."

"Sometimes Visual Studio is slow. It uses a lot of resources like memory and processing power. You should optimize the performance by only installing what you need on your machine. Don't install unnecessary things that will slow your machine."

"The price is reasonable, but it's not the best."

"The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable."

"It is not good in terms of performance. When you open Visual Studio, you have to wait for a while to process your code. It uses a lot of resources and has a lot of features. If we could disable some of the features, it would be lighter and faster to use. Nowadays, for some of the projects, we use VS Code for JavaScript or Python. VS Code is very light and easy to use, whereas, in Visual Studio, we have to wait because it takes time to compile or run a project. It has a lot of competitors in terms of performance, such as Intelligent ID. Intelligent ID is very easy to use. It has many features, and it is lighter to use than Visual Studio. In terms of error handling, sometimes, it shows an error before you finish your code, which can be improved. It would be good if it has a version for Linux. I use VS Code on Linux, but I am not sure if Visual Studio has a version for Linux."

"It is hard to learn, and you need to invest time to understand it."

"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its scalability."

"The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface."

"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its stability."

"I positioned it at a mid-range level. It isn't an inexpensive solution, but considering its capabilities, it represents excellent value for the functionalities it offers."

"The tool is affordable."

"We pay for the solution annually and the price could be reduced."

"I think that the pricing is quite good."

"There is a paid version of the solution as well as a community version that is free."

"Our company pays a yearly licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional."

"We have licensing for Visual Studio Community edition."

"For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person."