Kandji vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

Kandji and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Kandji is ranked #31 with an average rating of 9.0, while Trellix is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.7. Kandji holds a 0.5% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kandji users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and Kandji compete in the endpoint security category. Trellix seems to have a stronger position due to its advanced security features, while Kandji is more appealing for its ease of integration and user-friendly interface.

Features: Trellix offers advanced threat detection, real-time monitoring, and comprehensive security analytics. Kandji provides streamlined device management, seamless integration with Apple devices, and a robust iOS management experience. Trellix focuses on extensive security, whereas Kandji emphasizes user-friendliness and integration with Apple's ecosystem.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix offers flexible deployment and comprehensive support suitable for environments that require high-level customization. Kandji allows quick, efficient deployment, appealing to organizations in need of rapid, less complex onboarding. Kandji's responsive, personalized support aids effective customer service and ongoing assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix offers competitive pricing with high ROI for those seeking advanced protection. Kandji, despite a potentially higher initial cost, delivers significant ROI by efficiently managing Apple devices. The key difference is Trellix's cost-effectiveness in security returns opposed to Kandji's streamlined Apple-focused performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Kandji vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kandji vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.4%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kandji is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.3%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.4%
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform	3.3%
Kandji	0.5%
Other	92.8%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

reviewer2795433

Cloud Ops Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Automated updates have strengthened security and save me time on daily device management

In my opinion, the best features Kandji offers are its UI, which is very clean and clear to use, not overly cluttered, allowing me to see the icon of all the different apps that I can install, and when I click on the little icon in my toolbar, it shows me any updates which I am able to install, making it very easy to use. The clean UI and ease of use definitely save me time, probably cutting the time in half for trying to figure out when to install updates myself, because the notifications are pushed to me, which is good since I want to keep my system up to date without interfering with my workflow. Kandji has impacted my organization positively by definitely increasing security because it notifies you when an update is ready to be installed, and if you do not install it within a reasonable time frame, it would automatically install it, which is good, and it probably has saved at least 30% of my time from manually having to look for updates since it just notifies me when the update is ready. Kandji's automatic installation feature ensures our team's compliance or security posture, as it makes sure we are up to date and all on the same version of a particular tool, which is very important for a technical IT team to avoid differences that might affect functionality.

Read full review

PankajKumar24

IT Manager at Gigabit Technologies Pvt Ltd

Advanced threat prevention has strengthened incident response and customized security workflows

The biggest advantage of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is the ATP solution, which provides advanced threat prevention. Machine learning algorithms are available in the product as part of the threat anti-malware, including predictive machine learning and behavioral analysis, which are integral to the anti-malware module of EPP. In terms of my experience with the machine learning algorithms for analysis and threat detection, we are analyzing logs provided by Trellix, but we are not able to conduct specific machine learning analysis on those logs. The automated response mechanisms in the products help with incident management because we have to create playbooks in Trellix console for automation, which we need to enable. The customizable dashboard of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform definitely contributes to the decision-making process, as we customize the dashboard according to customer requirements. When it comes to integration aspects, we are able to integrate Trellix Endpoint Security Platform with SIEM or SOAR solutions using the ePO console, which enhances threat detection capabilities. Reporting and analytics aspects have an impact on security posture assessment, as we are able to fetch reports in the ePO console customized according to customer requirements for downloading and sending via email.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"They did what they said, and this solution could apply to any scenario."

"It blocks malicious files. It prevents attacks. It doesn't require many updates, it's a very light application."

"We have a complete overview of all our PCs and it's very easy to handle and to use the interface. It has a lot of benefits for us."

"Implementing Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has had a significant impact on my security analyst workload because it becomes much easier."

"Technical support is the best in class, in my opinion, because they have invested heavily in research and development."

"After deploying Traps, we saw the performance of the network improve by 65 to 70 percent."

"The stability of this product is very good."

"I recommend this solution to others because it is easy to manage, reliable, and overall good to use."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"I highly recommend Kandji to others looking into using it since I have not seen any game-breaking issues; it is highly reliable, scalable, improves security, and reduces the time individuals need to spend on system configuration for security updates."

"It's a very easy plug-and-play solution where you can just enroll the devices and choose the features you want."

"When Intel acquired McAfee they worked on the protocol so that all vendors can work on the same platform, which is a very big improvement because all McAfee products talk to each other and other vendors' products can join this platform as well so it makes it more powerful on the enterprise side for McAfee."

"The product is quite user-friendly."

"McAfee Endpoint Security 10.5 has improved our security and made our customers more effective."

"It is a really strong solution for endpoint security."

"The most valuable features of the solution include DLP (data loss prevention), CASB (cloud access security broker) functionality, endpoint encryption, and cloud workload security."

"I prefer FireEye to solutions like CrowdStrike, Carbon Black, and Trend Micro which are not as user-friendly."

"The compatibility with a variety of laptops is our biggest advantage."

"There are many other endpoint security solutions that are available today, but McAfee Suite has several distinct advantages when you make a procurement decision."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros

Cons

"It is a complex solution to implement."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses. For example, if users select a license, they think they will have all the platforms they need to improve their network or security. But after some time, Palo Alto Networks changed their licensing, and some of the features that, for example, were free at the beginning now have a cost. I think the integration can be improved. For example, a lot of tools are just integrated through APIs."

"In an upcoming release, the solution could improve by providing hard disk encryption."

"This is a very costly product."

"In an upcoming release, the solution could improve by proving hard disk encryption. If it could support this it would be a complete solution."

"There are some false positives. What our guys would have liked is that it would have been easier to manipulate as soon as they found a false positive that they knew was a false positive. How to do so was not obvious. Some people complained about it. The interface, the ESM, is not user-friendly."

"There are some false positives."

"One thing that was missing was the integration part. Currently, they don't have out-of-box integration with IBM QRadar, or if they have the integration, the integration doesn't work well."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"Kandji should give open customization."

"Technical support from the vendor is very bad."

"Currently, Trellix Endpoint Security can't find the running mutexes, while other open-source products can do it."

"The resolution time should be faster."

"One thing I think it should do is alert administration if some attack is happening in local systems."

"I hope the solution can be used in cloud systems going forward."

"Their support is not good and needs to be improved."

"Sometimes when it runs in the background of the endpoint, the devices get slowed down for some software applications."

"The product’s on-premise version is costly in terms of extra charges for SQL database and Windows server licenses."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has a higher cost than other solutions, like CrowdStrike or Microsoft’s EDR tools, but it reduces the cost of our operations because it’s a new generation antivirus tool."

"If one wishes to work with another team or large number of users at a future point, he must purchase a license for them."

"The solution has one subscription for endpoint protection and one subscription for detection and response. The two licenses combined give you the BRO version."

"I feel it is fairly priced."

"We didn't have to pay any additional fee for the cloud instance. It just came with the renewal, which was nice."

"Every customer has to pay for a license because it doesn't work with what you get from a managed services provider."

"In terms of the cost Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very expensive because we are a Mexican company and when you translate dollars to pesos the cost is very high. The solution is very expensive for Mexican companies. I understand that they have international prices, but I do not think it offsets the price enough for many companies in countries, such as Mexico. The amount it is reduced is not a massive percentage."

"Its pricing is kind of in line with its competitors and everybody else out there."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee for Kandji, which is expensive."

"Microsoft Defender is not cheap and from a cost perspective, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a better option."

"MVISION is intended as an enterprise product and it is priced like one. This solution is within the price range of competitors at the enterprise level."

"The price of the product is similar to the ones in the market that offer the same features."

"The price of this product is good."

"The solution is not an expensive tool. Compared to other options, it's mostly average-priced. I've deployed it for customers ranging from 100 nodes to over 5,000 nodes. Its renewal prices are very low, and it offers both perpetual and subscription licenses. With a perpetual license, the product will keep working as long as it's not end-of-life, which benefits companies."

"It is a yearly subscription-based product, which includes the license and hardware. There is also a subscription for technical support up to five years."

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint is not very good, and I would rate its cost three out of five, though I won't be able to mention how much its actual price is."

"Pricing is reasonable and runs at a cost per user per year."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	47

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	68
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	62

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kandji?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that their pricing structure is bucket-based, requiring lice...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kandji?

I have not been involved in the purchase process of Kandji, but I understand it is very Apple-centric and they have v...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kandji?

My main use case for Kandji is that within my organization, I have a Mac as my work laptop, and Kandji is used for se...

See all answers

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deplo...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effec...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Endpoint Security?

I don't have visibility on pricing because it is negotiated by a different team, as I look after the technical side.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Wazuh vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 2% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Jamf Pro vs Kandji

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Kandji

Compared 18% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kandji

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kandji

Compared 12% of the time

Open EDR vs Kandji

Compared 6% of the time

More Kandji Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

March 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

February 2026

Download Kandji product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

March 2026

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Kandji’s automations are a force multiplier. They free your technology team from repetitive tasks, letting you focus energy on more impactful projects. Kandji has purpose-built experiences from setup and app installs to software updates and computer restarts. It’s what your teams expect from a company with high standards. From increased efficiency to lower cost of ownership, your bottom line is our top priority.

Kandji

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?

Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology

Buyer's Guide

Kandji vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

March 2026

Free Report: Kandji vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Kandji vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kandji vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.