Nintex Process Platform and KiSSFLOW are competitive workflow automation solutions. KiSSFLOW may have an edge with superior features and perceived value for its price.
Features: Nintex emphasizes scalability and performance with a browser-based designer requiring no client tools, providing seamless SharePoint integration. It automates workflows and processes delivering ROI. KiSSFLOW focuses on user-friendly drag-and-drop simplicity, flexibility, and quick process development. It integrates with platforms like Google Drive and DocuSign, enhancing automation and customization.
Room for Improvement: Nintex needs better default logging, notifications, error reporting, and reduced server intensity. There's a demand for more efficient workflow management. KiSSFLOW should improve customization, especially in UI design, document syncing automation, and intuitive input fields.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex is primarily on-premises with some public and hybrid cloud options. Its technical support is varied but supported by an extensive online community. KiSSFLOW offers flexibility in cloud environments and generally positive support with areas for efficiency and local assistance improvement.
Pricing and ROI: Nintex is more expensive, justified by its features, with a shift from perpetual to subscription licensing impacting costs. KiSSFLOW is more affordable though acknowledged as higher cost compared to some competitors. Both solutions indicate significant ROI, emphasizing time savings and workflow management benefits.
I found the support to be excellent with immediate responses whenever I open a ticket.
Performance issues arise if we have multiple joins within the actions, which definitely reduces the performance.
Performance issues arise if we have multiple joins within the actions, which definitely reduces the performance.
If we receive data in JSON, there is no action available in Nintex Process Platform to parse the data and extract data from that JSON string.
Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.
Nintex Process Platform is expensive.
We use Nintex Process Platform for process automation.
My team and I created a demo using Nintex, focusing on getting emails, reading, writing, and managing attachments.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Nintex Process Platform | 1.6% |
| KiSSFLOW | 0.8% |
| Other | 97.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 25 |
Nintex Process Platform offers no/low-code development with system integrations and efficient workflow management, ideal for complex business processes. It's known for its scalable workflows, data management through SmartObjects, and a user-friendly visual designer.
Nintex Process Platform enables organizations to automate processes with ease, supporting electronic forms, digital transformation, and seamless department collaboration. Users on SharePoint and other integrated systems leverage its extensive workflow capabilities for approvals, onboarding, and information capture. While its current framework might benefit from performance enhancements and improved management console usability, it remains a strong choice for providing scalable solutions across industries.
What are the key features of Nintex Process Platform?Companies in sectors like government, HR, and financial services implement Nintex Process Platform for its ability to streamline and connect internal processes. It supports approval workflows, notifications, and data capturing, proving its versatility for diverse business needs. However, challenges with document conversion, performance, and cloud feature parity suggest room for enhancements, particularly in industries handling complex workflows.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
