You must select at least 2 products to compare!
K2 Logo
Read 6 K2 reviews
4,758 views|3,307 comparisons
1,786 views|1,186 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between K2 and KiSSFLOW based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: November 2022).
656,474 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"K2 is reasonably priced.""The workflow engine of K2 is its main strength. Its workflow engine is probably one of the best, and that's the reason why Nintex bought K2. It can clearly handle any complex process or scenario. K2 is almost low-code. It is a no-code or low-code solution. You don't have to read a whole lot of code. It is pretty much GUI based. Their support is also excellent. The biggest advantage of K2 is SmartObjects, which allow you to separate the data from the application. It is a standalone application that allows you to build a data source from different places, which a lot of other applications also do. It is called SmartObjects technology, which is pretty powerful. If I have data from different applications, such as JD and ServiceNow, I can just create a SmartObject based on a data source and use it. I have some forms that have six, seven, or eight applications in a single form with data from different places.""K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding.""The most valuable features of this solution are that it's no code, it's very flexible, and it's easy to design.""The integration capabilities have been very useful.""The setup is easy."

More K2 Pros →

"The user interface is very, very good."

More KiSSFLOW Pros →

"It's very tedious to manage.""The Workflow Designer needs improvement.""K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows.""There have been some glitches, and the workflow fails frequently.""Currently, it's taking quite some time to deploy a package, it needs improvement""K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."

More K2 Cons →

"They should increase their marketplace with existing tools so that connections are directly through connectors instead of API integrations."

More KiSSFLOW Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."
  • "There is an initial fee when purchasing and a fee for maintenance afterward."
  • "For the initial hundred users, the cost is $21,000 per year, which I find too high."
  • More K2 Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    656,474 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:K2 is reasonably priced and you pay for licenses. It costs less than half a million, and you own your licenses yearly. Additionally, you pay 400,000 for support and maintenance, but similar tools… more »
    Top Answer:The solution's flexibility can be improved. K2 needs to be fully code-free, and they should try Endeavor to make it code-free. It will help to hide the complexities of smart objects. Improvements can… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is the performance.
    Top Answer:This is an affordable product and everything is included in the subscription.
    Top Answer:The integration between forms should be made easier. Form attachments should be improved. I would like to see improvements made to storage integration.
    Average Words per Review
    Average Words per Review
    Nintex Workflow logo
    Compared 40% of the time.
    Camunda Platform logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    IBM BPM logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Pega BPM logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Appian logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Microsoft Power Apps logo
    Compared 17% of the time.
    Nintex Workflow logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    ServiceNow logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Bizagi logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Appian logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Also Known As
    K2 blackpearl, K2 Five
    Learn More

    K2's process automation platform helps your company grow and take automation to a new level. Tackle any business problem—large or small—and create an app to solve it, without writing lines of code.

    KiSSFLOW understands that you know how to solve your office chaos problems better than anyone else. That’s why they created a cloud-based platform to help business leaders create, modify, and use automated business applications. You can make each application with beautiful, easy-to-use, and modern technology. You get the functionality of high-end BPM software with no coding or complicated mapping required, so you don’t have be a programmer to create amazing applications.
    Learn more about K2
    Learn more about KiSSFLOW
    Sample Customers
    SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL
    KiSSFLOW has 1.3 million users and 10,000+ customers across 121 countries. The people who get the most out of KiSSFLOW are business leaders like department heads, senior managers, and process owners who want to automate repetitive processes. These people can set up and modify the application on their own. The interface is simple so that all the users in the organization can utilize it through the web application, mobile apps (iOS and Android), smart actions on Gmail, and email notifications. Notable companies are Royal Caribbean, Dominos, Motorola, Danone, The Telegraph, Michelin, and PepsiCo.
    Top Industries
    Computer Software Company19%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Insurance Company7%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Insurance Company7%
    Company Size
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise43%
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Process Management (BPM)
    November 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: November 2022.
    656,474 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    K2 is ranked 12th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews while KiSSFLOW is ranked 17th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 1 review. K2 is rated 7.8, while KiSSFLOW is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of K2 writes "A low-code solution that saves a lot of time and resources and has the best workflow engine and SmartObjects technology". On the other hand, the top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "Easy to use, simple to create process forms, and easily expands". K2 is most compared with Nintex Workflow, Camunda Platform, IBM BPM, Pega BPM and Appian, whereas KiSSFLOW is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Nintex Workflow, ServiceNow, Bizagi and Appian.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.