We performed a comparison between Joomla and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management."One of the most robust, stable, secure, feature-rich CMSs on the market."
"The speed in which you can take a CMS and make it a full-blown shopping cart with analytics tracking, SEO, user accounts, security, and ease of use through a robust framework of modules and plugins to enhance and promote-related content is about as turnkey as it gets with Joomla."
"The access control is definitely a good feature. We also appreciate the improvements they've made to the online applications, where multiple users can work on the same documents simultaneously. Everything syncs automatically."
"Tech support tops off as excellent."
"Its functionality is enormous."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The most valuable features of SharePoint Online are content management, document management, and approval processes. Additionally, there are a number of features that provide integration with multiple Office services and external services."
"Staff training is reduced because learning basic SharePoint is not as complicated as an EDRMS."
"Helps with document collaboration and workflow."
"The security feature is valuable."
"I would like to see more back-end admin power pulled into the front-end, therefore the admins will not have to use the back-end as much, especially for the menu manager, user manager, etc. versus using third-party extensions to achieve this."
"I would like to see the same sorting and attributes available through the web browser on the JED (sorting by free or commercial license, sort by rating, popularity, etc.) within the back-end Joomla Web Installer when browsing extensions."
"Replication needs improvement."
"The product could be improved in a lot of way. It is so frustrating to get things to work as advertised."
"Make it more intuitive."
"I understand that some functions are lost when you store the information in a file system, so maybe that's a way SharePoint can improve."
"We would like more security features, like automating."
"SharePoint designer workflows can be buggy sometimes without any apparent reason."
"Flexibility and extensibility, above everything, could be improved."
"Processing data from multiple site collections is not easy as they reside in different databases."
Earn 20 points
Joomla is ranked 14th in Web Content Management while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Web Content Management with 146 reviews. Joomla is rated 8.6, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Joomla writes "One of the most robust, stable, secure, feature-rich CMSs on the market". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Joomla is most compared with , whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and WordPress.
See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.